If the walk down from the Rotunda isn't possible or practical for you (start off 5.30pm from the Rotunda, show up earlier if banners need fettling), see you outside the Town Hall at 6pm or very soon afterwards.<snip> 6pm start outside the town hall?
There seems a lot in there still "draft" (like the Information for Tenants and the Information for Homeowners booklets/leaflets)
That's just a detail from the scene. Presumably people interested in what was going on would take the time to read further.Those posters (if currently being used) probably need some clarification. The way it reads at the moment is "they lied to us, they said there would be five options" then proceeds to confirm there were five options.
Good turn out from Urbanites.
Met a friend I had not seen for a while and we went to Beehive ( big mistake as special offers on ciders at £2.20 a pint)
On way down saw the PC plod was outside Foxtons. Just in case
Three when I went past.There were two plod guarding Foxtons when I went to get drinks from the shop.
Three when I went past.
Anyway, to sum up the planning meeting, there were some fantastically passionate speeches delivered by residents. One of them a 12 year old girl and also our very own fantastic Greebo
The resident (who is possibly Australian/Kiwi??) put in a fantastic defence as well and blasted way over her allocated three minutes.
There seems to be little likelihood that the councillors are going to shift their unanimous position which is the nuclear bulldozer option.
There were also a lot of issues raised about transparency and the shambles that was the recent 'consultation'.
Here's the Buzz piece. It's pretty much a quote for quote as to how to how the evening unfolded at Cabinet. The debate was passionate, but I can't but help think that there was no real debate. The decision had long since been made.
And put out very quickly. Well doneVery good piece
And put out very quickly. Well done
Interested to hear about involvement of barrister at the end there. Is that the first such involvement? From the quote, it doesn't sound like he said much more than echo residents' concerns. Have specific legal grounds for taking it to the High Court been identified?