Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour leadership

He looks like he doesn't want to win or is not bothered about winning precisely because that is the case!

You may well take a different view but I, for one, would like to have an executive who wants the job and is prepared to accept the entirety of its mandate with proper enthusiasm.
He's a career politician, of course he wants it. You can bet he's happy as larry to find the spotlight again in what he must have assumed to be the twilight of his career. He just doesn't have that gleam of unnatural lust the others have in their eyes
 
Do you think it is right and proper that the weight of a Labour £3 newcomer to be equivalent to that of an historic member?

Given that the Miliband proposals for electing future Labour leaders were overwhelming approved by the party, it clearly is right and proper that they are now followed, unless you're ssuggesting that some group within the party should over-rule that decision at the eleventh hour.

I suspect what you mean is do people think it will benefit the Labour Party's chances at the next election or something similar, which is a quite different question, and although you've now returned to ranting about left wing politics being sunk for a generation, you've still neglected to come up with anything resembling a coherent argument for why you're claiming this
 
Given that the Miliband proposals for electing future Labour leaders were overwhelming approved by the party, it clearly is right and proper that they are now followed, unless you're ssuggesting that some group within the party should over-rule that decision at the eleventh hour.

I suspect what you mean is do people think it will benefit the Labour Party's chances at the next election or something similar, which is a quite different question, and although you've now returned to ranting about left wing politics being sunk for a generation, you've still neglected to come up with anything resembling a coherent argument for why you're claiming this

The reforms are legitimate. That is clear.

In exactly the same way that it is now clear that Miliband was one of the most abysmal leaders that Labour have ever had.

And now the argument is to continue this?
 
The reforms are legitimate. That is clear.

In exactly the same way that it is now clear that Miliband was one of the most abysmal leaders that Labour have ever had.

And now the argument is to continue this?

You've got it the wrong way round. Ed Miliband gave this all to the Labour right as a gift, they were the ones clamouring for a US style open primary as a way of diluting the influence of trade unions.

They just don't want to eat what they have asked for now that it is going against them.
 
The Miliband problem is crucial really.

if it had been David, Labour could have trounced the coalition.

I'm not so sure. I think the media could have decided that the elder brother was a right weirdo, just as they did with Ed, and with the same bad press, the same problems in Scotland (or worse), the same attraction of UKIP, the same distrust of Labour on immigration, the same inability to get half-hearted supporters out to vote, the same half-plausible claims that the Tories had been vindicated on the economy etc... it could all have ended up just as it did in fact end up. What special talent or strategy did David have that would have led to a Labour victory?
 
My Tory/UKIP-voting FiL this afternoon had only good things to say about Corbyn. He said he's taking Labour back to what it should always have been and these New Labour idiots are the ones who don't belong, etc. Was quite surprised to hear that from him. I doubt he's alone in that view, in his demographic. Whether that translates to a Labour vote is another matter, of course...
 
The reforms are legitimate. That is clear.

In exactly the same way that it is now clear that Miliband was one of the most abysmal leaders that Labour have ever had.

And now the argument is to continue this?

Is there any chance, even a small one, that you can make whatever point you're trying to make in a coherent way rather than just jumping around spouting nonsense which doesn't make any sense, either on the level of meaning what you think it means, or which has some foundation in fact and/or logic?

You've just gone back on your previous claim about it not being right and proper for the election to be conducted in the agreed way, and you're immediately throwing in a claim that Miliband was one of the most abysmal leaders that Labour have ever had (debatable but not really relevant) and the assertion that choosing Corbyn would be continuing this.

You really don't know what you're fucking on about, do you?
 
He was credible.

article-2299583-02C0AE2F00000578-270_306x423.jpg
 
Anyway - all this is useless.

He will get the nomination and left wing politics - real politics, mind, not theoretical lamentations - will be sunk for a generation.
Blair himself came out early doors and said that even if it was possible to be elected on an anti austerity/leftish/whatever platform he would not want it. Thats naked ideological reasoning over electability right there. Even if it were possible, he'd rather the party stayed in opposition.Corbyn has been elected by his constituents consistently and has spent most of his adult life in elected positions. I don't buy this 'unelectable' stuff. I'm not making any predictions but to rule it out completely on the basis of...of what? The editorials in the broadsheets and what nick robinson recons? If this last year or two in wider europe and england/scotland/wales/NI have proven anything its that nothings a dead cert anymore except the dead cert of pearl clutching horror from the establishment.
 
Anyway - all this is useless.

He will get the nomination and left wing politics - real politics, mind, not theoretical lamentations - will be sunk for a generation.

Real leftwing politics? you mean this sort of thing?
117391_1.jpg


Immigration-mug-square1.jpg


B0_JRjjIgAA6R3J.png


article-1205280-05FDBB48000005DC-772_468x525.jpg

Lord Mandelson greets billionaire David Geffen on the Rising Sun super yacht in Corfu



Pg-04-iraq-getty.jpeg
 
Do you think it is right and proper that the weight of a Labour £3 newcomer to be equivalent to that of an historic member?

Do you think that if the party (as they did) changed the rules - to very little protest - that it is right and proper to not hold a £3 newcomer to be equivalent in voting rights and power to an established member?
 
The Miliband problem is crucial really.

if it had been David, Labour could have trounced the coalition.

Doubtful - his chance was about a year before that when he could have headed up the "ditch Gordon" movement from government, called a snap election and seen off enough of Cameron and Clegg to not lose as badly as Gordon did. That he blew that chance, then lost to his brother, and then ran off in a sulk suggests that he actually would not have been the great leader that is claimed.
 
Back
Top Bottom