John Lennon: crap or not crap?
- Thread starter Crannadict
- Start date
andysays
Love and solidarity
I'm really tempted to start a "Crannadict, crap/not crap" thread, but since it would fall foul of the no call out threads rule, I won't.
Of the many ways in which crannadict is crap, the two most striking to me are
They start off by claiming that any criticism of the relatively minor band they are inexplicably a huge fan of is terribly unfair, and then go around either bumping existing music threads or starting new ones to slag off other bands/artists in a remarkably ignorant and hypocritical way.
They appear to have no opinions about anything other than music.
Of the many ways in which crannadict is crap, the two most striking to me are
They start off by claiming that any criticism of the relatively minor band they are inexplicably a huge fan of is terribly unfair, and then go around either bumping existing music threads or starting new ones to slag off other bands/artists in a remarkably ignorant and hypocritical way.
They appear to have no opinions about anything other than music.
Lol...relatively minor band..
Still very much appreciated and listened to if youtube statistics are anything to go by band.
andysays
Love and solidarity
Please let's not make this yet another thread about Dolo.Lol...relatively minor band..
Still very much appreciated and listened to if youtube statistics are anything to go by band.View attachment 275027
Last edited:
Last edited:
Yep. I love Harrison's songs.
Insulting a person for their musical tastes is not the right thing to do
editor
hiraethified
I think we can make an exception in this case.
I don't care if you ban me from this site, but I'm going to tell you that after reading these to you, you prove to be a detestable person. You do not respect particular tastes and you believe yourself with the moral superiority that your seniority here supposedly gives you to give lessons on what is appropriate or not, according to systematic personal disqualification.
Reno
The In Kraut
I'd say most of U75 is in support of that !That the royal we then?
Ah well... bully for them then.
editor
hiraethified
Lol...relatively minor band..
Still very much appreciated and listened to if youtube statistics are anything to go by band.View attachment 275027
Just so you know: there is an absolute limit as to how many times the Cranberries can be dragged into unrelated threads.
Can you outline the parameters as a guide?
And maybe outline the reference quota?
I was only responding to another poster.
editor
hiraethified
General guide: if the thread hasn't got 'Cranberries' in the title, it's most likely not the place to go on about them again.Can you outline the parameters as a guide?
And maybe outline the reference quota?
I was only responding to another poster.
ElizabethofYork
Old Crone
This is why I thought Crannadict and Sugar Kane were the same person!
Reno
The In Kraut
I was being faintly positive about the Cranberries on one of the two threads but Sugar Cane and Crannaddict are starting to making me hate them ! I haven't listened to them since the 90s, so their only presence in my life now is two posters swamping the boards with obsessing over a band, that for most of us is irrelevant at this point.
Saul Goodman
It's all good, man
He was much better at walking than he was at not getting shot.
editor
hiraethified
No, not 'censored' in any way at all.
You are free to go on and on and on and fucking on about this incredibly average band for as much as you like in the appropriate threads. There are already hundreds of posts about them and you can keep on adding to those dull threads whenever you like, adding as many posts as you like.
However, I'm not having endless unrelated threads being dragged off topic as is happening right here. The rules are already quite clear on this kind of disruptive conduct.
"Censorship" LOL.
Average bands are Oasis, New Order, Blur, The Smiths, Oasis or The Stone Roses. Bands that only sold records in the UK and now only play on UK radios
(Except for Wonderwall)
LOL
(Except for Wonderwall)
LOL
editor
hiraethified
So in your mind, a band's quality can be solely judged by their record sales/internet streams, yes?
Are you really denying the compositional quality of one of the very few independent bands that had commercial success in the 90's?
I never imagined that a certain part of the English population would be still so suspicious that an Irish band of "peasants" (Melody Maker: 1994) was one of the 10 bigggest in the world LOL in 90s
editor
hiraethified
Your answer bears zero relation to the question asked. Please try again.
I did say ok...no worries.
And I was not the person who brought them into this thread.
I do note that plenty other people have brought up the band in a derogatory way in other threads that were not about the band.
And this is why you're a bit of a tit... as you know we are not the same person.
Similar threads
