mauvais
on reddit or something
Won't make any difference either way.The Airbus thing has the potential to shake things up a bit. They are warmongering cunts but carry a bit more economic weight than Dyson or Spoons cunt.
Won't make any difference either way.The Airbus thing has the potential to shake things up a bit. They are warmongering cunts but carry a bit more economic weight than Dyson or Spoons cunt.
Won't make any difference either way.
Sure. But not to the political process of Brexit.It might to the 100,000+ people with airbus associated jobs
via Philip Hammond urges business leaders to accept Brexit resultBut the chancellor said businesses had to accept that free movement was coming to an end and urged companies to rethink business models based on cheap, low-skilled labour.
Sure. But not to the political process of Brexit.
It might do exactly what it was intended to; give cover to a tranche of 'rebel' tory MPs who will now fall back into line muttering things about wings etc.Won't make any difference either way.
After Brexit, if it happens. Until then it can be compartmentalised to the hypothetical, or the 'they would say that', or the 'would have happened anyway'.I'm hopeful the seriousness of job losses will eventually hit home. Labour talk about a jobs first brexit while Boris shouts Fuck Business. This madness had to end at some point!
This is the maddest thing I've heard for a while:
But the chancellor said businesses had to accept that free movement was coming to an end and urged companies to rethink business models based on cheap, low-skilled labour.
via Philip Hammond urges business leaders to accept Brexit result
Businesses don't have to accept it, they just have to move to somewhere else where their current business model will still work. Like the continent.
Yeah, in-person services are obviously not vulnerable to relocation to low(er) wage jurisdictions. But they are vulnerable to wage depression if routine production employers are doing so and shedding workers.Yep, moving all those farms, hand car wash places, etc., etc., shouldn't be too difficult.
Yep, moving all those farms, hand car wash places, etc., etc., shouldn't be too difficult.
We should probably just leave it to the experts.
this is very sweet.Democracy requires those who vote to research and think about the issues they're voting on. We may each come to different conclusions as a result of it, and that's fantastic.
I don't think you're qualified to decide this.We should probably just leave it to the experts.
That was the remainer argument.I don't think you're qualified to decide this.
If Hammond had a problem saying things he knows to be untrue I'd imagine he'd have chosen another career.I'm very, very far from being a Tory, but on a human level I do feel for Phillip Hammond, meant to be the Chancellor, but now being made to say illiterate things him and his team surely just cannot believe.
If Hammond had a problem saying things he knows to be untrue I'd imagine he'd have chosen another career.
There was a phase on this thread where that was the line - the people voted for Brexit; the Irish stuff isn't their problem; the politicians just have to sort it out now.We should probably just leave it to the experts.
Doubt his careers advisor would have had much on file that didn't involve lying to some extent.If Hammond had a problem saying things he knows to be untrue I'd imagine he'd have chosen another career.
There was a phase on this thread where that was the line - the people voted for Brexit; the Irish stuff isn't their problem; the politicians just have to sort it out now.
How did millionaire oxbridge bankers become the ones people listen to, rather than looking objectively at the facts themselves?
Not if you half-arse it, safe in the knowledge that another stocktake isn't going to happen until so much time has passed that you'll have deniability for any glaring discrepancies.
And what are the issues? The economics 101 you mentioned? How is this demonstrable evidence defined?* You seem to that a similar view to Rogers when he saysNo, we should attempt to understand the issues ourselves, then take our democratic decisions based on them. Democracy requires those who vote to research and think about the issues they're voting on. We may each come to different conclusions as a result of it, and that's fantastic. But abrogation of our decision to others, or refusal to consider demonstrable evidence (because "we've had enough of experts / it's just project fear") essentially cause democracy to stop working. Which is exactly what people pushing those lines want.
Ivan Rogers said:We desperately need clear and honest thinking about our choices not just for the weeks but for the years, indeed decades, ahead. I continue to think that our political debate is bedevilled by what, at the time I resigned, I termed “muddled thinking”, and by fantasies and delusions as to what our options really are in the world as it is.
Day by day i do see things beginning to solidify for May and her deal. There is definitely some European countries sweating and breaking cover and today reports that the DUP may have been won over.
How much are they getting this time? £25 Billion?
Not quite sure why the DUP wants brexit, tbf. It's not particularly logical for them to support something that stresses the Union. Keeping the tories in power has to be their main motivation.What's in it for the DUP?
They get Brexit and they keep the tories in power which are two things they very much want. Like the ERG they have to play their hand delicately, they want to dictate things exactly on their terms but if they overplay their hand then they run the risk of a general election, a Corbyn government and a soft Brexit or even no Brexit at all. Things they are not keen on, one little bit.
A pride saving compromise just needs to be found on the backstop, which I suspect will or already has.