What's Next for NASA's New Mars Lander?InSight arrived at its new home yesterday afternoon (Nov. 26), acing a touchdown on an equatorial plane called Elysium Planitia. The lander will begin probing the Red Planet's interior in unprecedented detail — a few months from now.
It'll take that long for InSight to deploy and calibrate its two main science instruments, a burrowing heat probe and a suite of super-sensitive seismometers. This gear must be placed on the Martian surface by the lander's robotic arm, and InSight team members want to make sure they get this crucial step — which no other Mars robot has ever done — exactly right. [NASA's InSight Mars Lander: Full Coverage]
So, the researchers will spend the next few weeks studying InSight's landing site carefully, deciding on the best deployment area. Then they'll practice deployment using a testbed lander here at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which manages InSight's mission.
This work will include "terraforming" the testbed to resemble InSight's actual environs on the Red Planet, mission instrument operations lead Elizabeth Barrett of JPL said yesterday during a post-landing news conference here.
Barrett likened deployment to a very difficult and high-stakes version of an arcade claw-machine game.
"It makes it a little bit longer — you need to take more pauses, to make sure you actually have the grapple on the payload before you lift it up, and it's actually on the ground before you let it go," Barrett said.
InSight's arm will actually perform three such placements, because it will drop a shield over the seismometer suite to insulate the instrument from wind and temperature swings, which could interfere with data collection and interpretation.
It'll take two to three months to finish the deployments, Barrett said, "and then another couple of months" before InSight's ready to begin its Mars science campaign in earnest. The additional time will be needed for the heat probe to hammer itself up to 16 feet (5 meters) below the surface, and to calibrate both instruments properly.
Precise timing can vary with launch vehicle, payload mass, timing with respect to the transfer window, planetary positioning, but it was a fairly standard Hohmann transfer orbit (though the launch vehicle had plenty of energy in reserve and InSight is a pretty lightweight payload). The predominate factor governing the cruise time is the relative offset of the major/minor axes of the orbits of the Earth and Mars (their orbits are not circular). So it can take anywhere between approx. 6 to 8 months.How did it get there so fast? It launched in May so it took barely more than 6 and a half months. Using a chemical rocket. Favourable planetary positions?
Precise timing can vary with launch vehicle, payload mass, timing with respect to the transfer window, planetary positioning, but it was a fairly standard Hohmann transfer orbit (though the launch vehicle had plenty of energy in reserve and InSight is a pretty lightweight payload). The predominate factor governing the cruise time is the relative offset of the major/minor axes of the orbits of the Earth and Mars (their orbits are not circular). So it can take anywhere between approx. 6 to 8 months.
No, this is about the same as every mission to Mars. It's quite a close planet, relatively speaking. The gas giants take a long time to get to cos they're much further away, and Mercury take a long time to slingshot up enough velocity to get there. Venus and Mars can be got to pretty quickly (3 and 6 months)I thought it could take up to a year, or even two years, presumably using a Hohmann transfer orbit. I might be getting that confused with a potential manned Mars mission, perhaps.
Yes, perhaps you are thinking manned and/or sample return flight to Mars timescale?I thought it could take up to a year, or even two years, presumably using a Hohmann transfer orbit. I might be getting that confused with a potential manned Mars mission, perhaps.
That surface seems a bit less forgiving than they planned for. I'm looking at that boulder a couple of feet away, which could have given the thing a severe list. Still, fortune favours the brave, etc.3D images here:
Mars Panorama - Curiosity rover: Martian solar day 2082
e2a: Wrong Mars lander, carry on
That surface seems a bit less forgiving than they planned for. I'm looking at that boulder a couple of feet away, which could have given the thing a severe list. Still, fortune favours the brave, etc.
Ah, right you are. There's still a rock close to InSight. But it's only the size of an arrowhead... Wait a minute... arrow heads on Mars?Yeah those pictures are from Curiosity, not the new lander. Sounds like the new one has managed to land in a pretty perfect spot.
InSight sensors captured a haunting low rumble caused by vibrations from the wind, estimated to be blowing between 10 to 15 mph (5 to 7 meters a second) on Dec. 1, from northwest to southeast. The winds were consistent with the direction of dust devil streaks in the landing area, which were observed from orbit.
Two very sensitive sensors on the spacecraft detected these wind vibrations: an air pressure sensor inside the lander and a seismometer sitting on the lander's deck, awaiting deployment by InSight's robotic arm. The two instruments recorded the wind noise in different ways. The air pressure sensor, part of the Auxiliary Payload Sensor Subsystem (APSS), which will collect meteorological data, recorded these air vibrations directly. The seismometer recorded lander vibrations caused by the wind moving over the spacecraft's solar panels, which are each 7 feet (2.2 meters) in diameter and stick out from the sides of the lander like a giant pair of ears.
"The InSight lander acts like a giant ear," said Tom Pike, InSight science team member and sensor designer at Imperial College London. "The solar panels on the lander's sides respond to pressure fluctuations of the wind. It's like InSight is cupping its ears and hearing the Mars wind beating on it. When we looked at the direction of the lander vibrations coming from the solar panels, it matches the expected wind direction at our landing site". Pike compared the effect to a flag in the wind. As a flag breaks up the wind, it creates oscillations in air pressure that the human ear perceives as flapping. Separately, APSS records changes in pressure directly from the thin Martian air.
Unlike the vibrations recorded by the short period sensors, audio from APSS is about 10 hertz, below the range of human hearing. The raw audio sample from the seismometer was released unaltered; a second version was raised two octaves to be more perceptible to the human ear - especially when heard through laptop or mobile speakers. The second audio sample from APSS was sped up by a factor of 100, which shifted it up in frequency.
No, I don’t think they have. This is a Mars threadEveryone seems to have overlooked that Huygens recorded the sound of wind on Titan in 2005.
Everyone seems to have overlooked that Huygens recorded the sound of wind on Titan in 2005.
It looks like it's about to burst into "Singin' In The Rain"First selfie
SEIS has just been levelled low - ie has squatted down next to the surface to optimise coupling for seismic signal pickup. The shield can now be placed over it.
Je suis désolé, Dave. J'ai bien peur de ne pas pouvoir faire ça.I love it when a robot talks French.