Just a reminder one of the reasons this case is considered so egregious by campaigners is because the Post Office subsequently put Griffiths’ widow under an NDA and appeared to string out. My colleague Jane Croft wrote this when Angela van den Bogerd gave evidence in April:
The inquiry heard that Griffiths and his mother had both written to the Post Office earlier in 2013 about the “severe pressure” and “worry” that he was experiencing due to the £39,000 shortfall, which he blamed on software errors.
Griffiths’ parents had used their life savings to repay back thousands of pounds of his purported shortfalls, the inquiry heard. The Post Office was also demanding Griffiths pay back £7,500 after an armed robbery at his branch for which he had been partly blamed because he had failed to follow certain security procedures, the inquiry heard.
Griffiths attempted suicide on 23 September 2013 and died in hospital weeks later.
The Post Office eventually offered his widow, Gina Griffiths, £140,000 in a settlement agreement and insisted she sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA). An internal document said “staged payments” had been agreed “which we asked for as an incentive for Mrs Griffiths maintaining confidentiality”.
Jason Beer KC, counsel to the inquiry, asked Van den Bogerd whether the Post Office was using the “drip feeding of money” to Griffiths’ widow “as a means of ensuring she keeps it [his case] hushed up”.
“‘You don’t get any more money unless you keep quiet.’ That’s what this is, isn’t it?,” Beer put to her.