Joan Twelves article in Labour List is spot on - from her point of view.
I guess the Adonis question might indicate how cynical the Labour party is in order to halt a Lib Dem challenge. It might even have the advantage to them of further muddying the waters following the reversed conference vote on the Labour line in a referendum vote two weeks ago. Ask Jenny Formby.
Meanwhile Paul Mason, another leftie from the same neck of the woods as Joan Twelves has come out - in effect - for Margaret Becket as caretaker PM. In the I newspaper today he writes a detailed article whose peroration ends thus:
"Here's how I think this crisis is going to play out. With luck, the European Union will reject Johnson's half-baked plan. On Saturday 19 October he will be forced by law to ask for an extension and will either defy the law or resign. If he does not resign, then come Monday 21 October, MPs will have to put up or shut up: there will be a vote of no confidence and Johnson's government will fall.
It will then take less than 24 hours to find out if Corbyn can form a government. If he can't then Labour supporters like me have to accept it as a fact and move on: the government we really care about is the one the comes out of an election. And not an election held with Johnson in charge – he has shown himself willing to break our unwritten constitution and his main advisor remains in contempt of parliament for refusal to answer questions over the conduct of the Leave campaign.
So once Johnson falls, and Corbyn can't form a government, I hope Labour MPs move swiftly to back a short term, and politically neutral, government led by Clarke, Beckett or even the Speaker, John Bercow, with a mandate for just two jobs: to ask Brussels for a Brexit delay and call an election in late November."
A neutral government could break the Brexit deadlock
I think Paul Mason article is flawed.
the three people he puts up as leaders of a "neutral government" aren't neutral. Clarke and Beckett are full on Remainers. Bercow isn't trusted as being neutral on Brexit. Many Brexit supporters see him as Remainer. Something he hasn't gone out of his way to dispell.
So what is the problem with the leader of the main opposition party being caretaker leader?
Looked at rationally and Corbyn is more neutral than the three people that Mason puts forward.
I've two friends Labour party supporters criticising him for not being Remain enough. Pointed out to them his position was to accept the result. Negotiate a realistic leave option. Then put that to a confirmatory referendum. With a Remain option.
This imo is the neutral position.
Its not the position of LDs.
So what is the reason for not having Corbyn as caretaker leader of temporary government?
Its that he is not part of the middle class centre ground. He is beyond the pale. He isn't fit to run this country.
So the problem is Corbyn represents something that the centre ground can't stomach.
And Corbyn is the politician who is the extremist. He is not, The two extremes are Boris and his right wing cabinet and opposing them the so called centre ground. A motley crew of Tories, Labour and LDs MPs many of whom supported austerity and or Blair's Third Way. But are now aligning themselves as the saviours of centre ground UK. FFS.
Politics in this country is all over the place.
The centre ground- some Labour, some Tory and all the LDs would rather Boris win than have a Marxist in power for a few weeks.
I'm a Remainer but if this goes on Im going to say fuck the middle class centre and go for it Boris.