Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hebden Bridge station (and other lovely railway stations)

I've only been there once and just to change trains (nor do I know what was there before) - but I don't find it all that bad.

Clumsy? Maybe a little. Over-engineered? Maybe a little. At least it's fairly generous in scale and has some natural light. It could be a lot worse. It's better than the extension to St Pancras, for example.

I think it's a bit unfair to compare it with the great Victorian terminii - they had a lot more cash to spend, lots of cheap labour, and a fraction of the technical requirements any building has to satisfy these days.

yeah. somewhere like birmingham new street is far worse.
 
Come on - natural light has to struggle to get through because of all those massive metal pipes blocking the light.

Most platforms are open to some degree or other anyway. One thing I will say about it is it's so cold. All the cold air seems to be trapped in Leeds station.
 
Come on - natural light has to struggle to get through because of all those massive metal pipes blocking the light.

Yeah, but even the st pancras roof needs a few bits of metal to hold it up.

stpancreas_roof_300x400.jpg
 
You can't seriously be comparing the elegance of St Pancras with the clunky mess that is Leeds station?!

No, that would be an unfair comparison for the reasons I mentioned before. Just making the point that the structure/glass ratio isn't any better there than it is at Leeds, from the look of it.

I'm not trying to say Leeds station is some sort of architectural wonder; I just think you're being a bit harsh on it.

But like I say I've only been there once so amn't particularly well qualified to pass comment.
 
But like I say I've only been there once so amn't particularly well qualified to pass comment.
I suggest you go. For a modern station, it's ugly, dark, badly designed and unpleasant to use. The low, windowless area leading to the platforms is as bad as New Street, and the entrance feels like an Eastern European checkpoint.
 
I'm not trying to say Leeds station is some sort of architectural wonder; I just think you're being a bit harsh on it.

I have to say that I find the Dark Arches a bit of a marvel:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/phill_dvsn/943360924/sizes/l/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ianpercival/929417613/sizes/o/

http://www.leeds-uk.com/river/cross-arch-22_JPG.htm

Am I right in remembering that these arches would have handled freight from the station above, as well as from the canal which also goes through here?

Otherwise, Leeds Station remains the only place where I've ever been offered a blowjob in exchange for a cigarrette.
 
Sure. But we're supposed to be better at things now.

Dunno? Although I'm no great fan of Victorian architecture, I have to hand it to them that they were masters of adventurous engineering & appreciated what could be got from the materials of the time in a way that few have managed since. :)
 
No, that would be an unfair comparison for the reasons I mentioned before. Just making the point that the structure/glass ratio isn't any better there than it is at Leeds, from the look of it.

I'm not trying to say Leeds station is some sort of architectural wonder; I just think you're being a bit harsh on it.

.

Aye. There are much much worse stations.
 
Seeing as I was specifically talking about a modern, large station, could you give some relevant examples please rather than stating the ruddy obvious?


Like I said New Street. That Manchester one I can't remember (actually, all the Manchester stations except Victoria)
 
Like I said New Street. That Manchester one I can't remember (actually, all the Manchester stations except Victoria)
Birmingham New Street was rebuilt over forty years ago. Hardly comparable to Leeds then, which was rebuilt as recently as 2002.
 
Birmingham New Street was rebuilt over forty years ago. Hardly comparable to Leeds then, which was rebuilt as recently as 2002.

It wasn't completely rebuilt. They did building work to parts of it. And I don't really see the distinction.

You make it sound as if the whole station was just thrown up over the last two years.
 
stalyclockbw.JPG


Has anyone mentioned Stalybridge station with its magnificent buffet yet?

When I lived in Manchester, a friend from York and I used to meet there for drinking sessions.
 
wow! that one has picnic benches and everything.

you could go on a day out there.

It's a wonderful place, that whole jouney from Fort William to Glasgow goes over the moor stopping at tiny stations in the middle of nowhere, one of those train lines worth taking just for the ride.

Ahh, Oxford Road, the bane of my life (especially now they've put ticket barriers in). The exterior's like Sydney Opera House (well, perhaps), the inside is, well, trains are fairly frequent so you don't have to stay. It's funny, on both the lines near me all the old stations were ripped out and replaced with concrete bunkers, except one station that's in a hard to access place. I'm glad they kept it. I'll get a photo and put it up.

If you want a truly hideous station go to Macclesfield. Words cannot describe this. It's part of the trinity of Macclesfield, Stafford and Coventry, the worst medium sized stations and all on the same line.

Preston's nice.
 
It wasn't completely rebuilt. They did building work to parts of it.
I've no idea why you insist on posting up tosh on this thread but allow me to correct you once again.

Birmingham The station was completely re-built by the British Railways in the mid 1960s, while Leeds was a "major rebuilding project."
By the 1990s, the station's capacity was exceeded on a daily basis, and the 1967 design was deemed inadequate. Between 1999 and 2002, a major rebuilding project took place, branded as Leeds 1st. This project saw the construction of additional approach tracks at the western end of the station, improving efficiency by separating trains travelling to or from different destinations and preventing them from having to cross each other's routes.

The station was expanded from 12 to 17 platforms, with the construction of new platforms on the south side, and reopening of the now-disused parcels depot to passengers on the north side. The majority of the track, points and signals were also replaced. The most visible change to passengers, however, was the replacement of the 1967 metal canopy with a new glass roof, considerably increasing the amount of daylight on the platforms.

A new footbridge was also provided, replacing the previous underpass.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_station
 
I've no idea why you insist on posting up tosh on this thread but allow me to correct you once again.

Birmingham The station was completely re-built by the British Railways in the mid 1960s, while Leeds was a "major rebuilding project."


What is your point then?

Leeds station isn't *that* different in terms of architecture as it was before. What has been modernised is mainly:

1) There are passenger accessible lifts. Before you needed to book assistance to use the staff only lifts.

2) There are more loos and shops/ vending machines on the platform front.

3) The outside concourse was 'embellished' with more shops

That's it, from a passenger POV. Anyone who claims Leeds Station was going to be radically different, or 'majorally rebuilt' was lying.

Leeds station was never a beauty spot, never the worse it could be. So it remains, just with lifts.

What did you actually expect? The hanging gardens of babylon????
 
Leeds station isn't *that* different in terms of architecture as it was before. What has been modernised is mainly:
Well, that and the construction of additional approach tracks at the western end of the station, the station growing nearly 50% in size with five new platforms, almost all of the track, points and signals being replaced, the building of a new taxi rank and bus interchange, the entire station canopy being removed and replaced, and a large new footbridge being constructed, replacing the previous underpass.

Makes you wonder how they managed to spend £245 million on that little exercise in window dressing!

LOL.
 
Editor - I think you seriously need to look up some photos of how cack Leeds Station used to be. I agree the new model is just a meccano set job, but at least yet it's not covered in ads.

As for Hebden Bridge (re-rails thread), that's not been done up recently - it was like that when I was at school in the 80s, and getting trains there regularly. All the stations on the Aire Valley, Wharfe Valley and Manchester lines out of Leeds are worth checking out, really.
 
And if you want a really crap modern tart-up station, look at Manchester Picadilly. It's like Leeds....but rammed full of KFC!
 
Editor - I think you seriously need to look up some photos of how cack Leeds Station used to be. I agree the new model is just a meccano set job, but at least yet it's not covered in ads..
Hey, I've no doubt that Leeds used to look shit but that doesn't excuse the crappy thing that's there now.

Sure it's not the worst station in the world, but seeing as we departed from that awful Mecanno/airport hybrid and ended our journey at the delightful Hebden Bridge, it really made me think of how poor the architecture was.

You just know that the new Leeds isn't expected to last more than 30-40 years before it falls apart and I find that kind of short-term, bodge-it design philosophy depressing.
 
Had the pleasure last year of doing a gig on the platform of Loughborough station! V.Bizarre idea and a clever bit of marketing for the sponsors but I was more interested in the place!
I know it`s not a true working station but it was still great to see it so well looked after. We even wandered down to the loco sheds to see them restoring the old steam locos.

Few pics..

loughborough007dh1.jpg

loughborough021tg0.jpg


and some of the old signage was great!

loughborough013pc1.jpg


Was a bit tricky sound checking when you get the shunting locos rumbling past every 5 mins:eek:

One of my nicest days of last year

.p.
 
Back
Top Bottom