So would making them pay for GP visits; would you enjoy that too?
Louis MacNeice
everyone has the right to health, that would be outrageous.
So would making them pay for GP visits; would you enjoy that too?
Louis MacNeice
Yes.
Have you seen the front page of today's? Unfuckingbelievable.
but not child benefit?Yes.
No he's not. Trev is giving an honest response to the policy of the government. In this case, it is going in the direction the left wants (the rich to pay more) so it is not as controversial as the keyboard warriors around here are making it appear.
So why is this universal benefit okay to attack? Do you think this is consistent with defending hospitals and pensions?
too far to the left they've popped round the other side.
Jesus.
whats on it?
but not child benefit?
So for the enjoyment afforded by the loss of £20 a week to people earning in excess of £45,000 per annum, you are willing to laugh along with Trev (who described the policy as brave and fair) at an important attack on universalism. There is evidence of a lack of real world politics; just not where you are pointing the finger.
Louis MacNeice
everyone has the right to health, that would be outrageous.
ha ha ha i take it YOU'RE not one of the spoilt rich kids throwing their toys out of the pram then !!
Many of them are on 44 grand + and are very very pissed off, i think that is more the truth of the matter. That would be like me losing 30p a week
All children have a right to support; a universal benefit guarantees that all children get it.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
because people on £44k a year won't miss it unless...read earlier post
not for the rich.
Give over Louis, u impotent muppet. Universalism has been attacked so much already it doesn't matter, this 'universal benefit' stands out as the exception rather than the rule. We do not live in a welfare state, we live in a state with selective & variable welfare.
Well, equally, they 'won't miss' public health care and state pensions either, you fool.
Shall we do a relay to the bottom trev?
I usually enjoy your posts, but this is just delusional.
so you are against universal benefits. so you must be against the universal benefits of the nhs and pensions?
if people on £44k can't support their kids they need taken into care
Maybe we can get the lib-dem tory vote out come may -do you drive trevs?
no because charging for health will deter people from seeing the doctor and could have serious consequences, but many rich people have BUPA anyway
They're not the kids who the universalism of CB protects. They are also not kids who will be threatened by the attack on universalism.
Louis MacNeice
They're not the kids who the universalism of CB protects. They are also not kids who will be threatened by the attack on universalism.
Louis MacNeice