not in the tabloids i wouldn't have thought?
didn't you check?
so you made that bit up then...
not in the tabloids i wouldn't have thought?
it would help that instead of being smug you could point me in the right direction
didn't you check?
so you made that bit up then...
of course it'll go further. that's the point of it.i did say if they went further it would be bad
Idiot.
what on earth is wrong with you BA?, attacking posters for opinions abusively, you know full well that this dichotomy is being resurrected, I only post on here now but if people continue to just insult posters, what is the point
I wouldn't go as far as that. Maybe he's just having an off day. Even I have them on occasion.
That was meant for you idiot.
of course it'll go further. that's the point of it.
you are probaby right but at the mo i would rather see rich people lose out than the very poorest , which is in this case, the case for now at least
I even had a socialist party prat arguing trev's view with me last night. Unbelievable.
i did say if they went further it would be bad but if left the way it is then fine, people on £44 grand are not gonna miss child benefit, unless they have a family of 7 and live in London
I even had a socialist party prat arguing trev's view with me last night. Unbelievable.
I even had a socialist party prat arguing trev's view with me last night. Unbelievable.
I'm 100% sure it's not. This is a 25 year plus member though. Did you teach him nothing?Not the SP line I have to say.
who woulda thought, socialists supporting money being taken from the rich!! bloody commies, put em in the army i say
I'm 100% sure it's not. This is a 25 year plus member though. Did you teach him nothing?
You can tell him yourself when you get down here.
This is why, despite my aberrations, people listen to me not you.
Sort it aht! Come to the big city.
Vote lib-dem - up the class war!
You're a very silly man trev
I am dictated to by my economic position