Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Guinness Trust plans for Loughborough Park Estate

This is the law - you might want to help your friends instead of wringing your hands and avoiding their actual rights:
I note you've still failed to answer the question. Sigh.

And if you think every eviction always follows those legal guidelines and there's never any intimidation or force, you truly are living in a fantasy world.
 
Why do you think the tenants were so worried? Any ideas? Are you able to empathise or understand anything?
Don't talk to me about "empahty". You're the cunt trying to conflate tenants rights with squatters rights - by doing that you're exploiting these poor people. Get a grip.

Or just fuck off because you are really - really - not helping.
 
Don't talk to me about "empahty". You're the cunt trying to conflate tenants rights with squatters rights - by doing that you're exploiting these poor people. Get a grip.
Why do you think the tenants were so worried that they started ringing around for people to come down? Why did they want the local media to come over? Why can't you answer that simple question?

Oh and cut out the gobby language.
 
Why do you think the tenants were so worried that they started ringing around for people to come down? Why did they want the local media to come over? Why can't you answer that simple question?
For the last time, you personally build hysteria by conflating two sets of rights. And then you talk about 'empathy. Do me a favour.

Have you exploited these people for your own 'photo-journalism' ends?
 
For the last time, you personally build hysteria by conflating two sets of rights. And then you talk about 'empathy. Do me a favour.
So you won't answer the question then?
Have you exploited these people for your own 'photo-journalism' ends?
I can see you think you're delivering some devastating point here, but I was ASKED by the tenants to come down and take the pictures. Why do you think that might be? Any idea?
And where have I built up "hysteria" ? The only person I see losing it here is you.
 
Don't talk to me about "empahty". You're the cunt trying to conflate tenants rights with squatters rights - by doing that you're exploiting these poor people. Get a grip.

Rather than just farting out a whine, why not make a case for what you're claiming? It shouldn't be hard for you to do, if it's as obvious as you imply.
 
These tenants apparently signed time-limited contracts in the knowledge that they would be asked to leave.
 
That's classy; conflating squatter and tenant rights < insert wrong photo here > to put the GT tenants in panic, and then also reporting half the story so the public are ill-informed. All about the *story* right.

And we're supposed to trust this shower with reporting on Pop Brixton and other local political issues ... Read all about it in the BrixtonLolz
 
Have you exploited these people for your own 'photo-journalism' ends?

I was rung up early in morning when the fences and security guards first arrived asking to get in contact with Brixton Buzz to see if they could come down to photograph it. I phoned Editor to ask him to come down. I also went down as well.

The tenants under threat of eviction asked for coverage.

editor came down straight away to his credit.

This was not about exploiting people. It was about supporting people who have been put under pressure by GT for months.

Pretty clear after the successful blockades in last few weeks Gt decided to get in security for a few days.
 
These tenants apparently signed time-limited contracts in the knowledge that they would be asked to leave.

In the real world people have limited choices. Its not a level playing field between landlords and tenants. If the tenants had not signed up then GT could have got someone else.

Secondly the "regeneration" of the estate took so long that the AST ended up with there children growing up here and going to local schools. It ended up as not being in practise short term.
 
In the real world people have limited choices. Its not a level playing field between landlords and tenants. If the tenants had not signed up then GT could have got someone else.

Secondly the "regeneration" of the estate took so long that the AST ended up with there children growing up here and going to local schools. It ended up as not being in practise short term.

In the real world, a deal is a deal and people move all the time, with and without children, often keeping them at schools two or three miles away.

And you seem to be suggesting that the security was in response to blockades - the blockades that my friend on the estate claims have delayed completion work and infuriated residents.
 
In the real world, a deal is a deal and people move all the time, with and without children, often keeping them at schools two or three miles away.

And you seem to be suggesting that the security was in response to blockades - the blockades that my friend on the estate claims have delayed completion work and infuriated residents.

I know secure residents who support the ASTs. As I have said before.

Do you think people like having to move on all time? Surely the point here is that should be changed. Small struggles like this are part of that.

The real world is pretty crap.

And I was suggesting that the security was a response to the blockades.
 
Back
Top Bottom