Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Greedy landlords rub their hands with glee as Londoners queue in the cold to buy flats

Are you for real? Can agree with you on nimbyism but the focus of this thread is on local inhabitants being forced out of their neighbourhoods/localities by speculators wanting to cash in on the speculative property values of London.
People being turfed out of their homes so speculators can make massive profits, you think this is acceptable?

No, it's not. The OP is about an off-plan new-build, not evictions.
 
My suspicion is that this was because editor was largely being lazy, not racist, although maybe xenophobic, and certainly localist.
And there you go again. Lazy, insulting, inaccurate drivel from a blazing, arrogant hypocrite.
 
No, it's not. The OP is about an off-plan new-build, not evictions.
Ok, I don't know London, but can you, or people familiar with the development, let me know if this development didn't disadvantage Londoners wanting to remain in their neighbourhoods?
 
I initially thought ViolentPanda 's Economist jibe was a little unfair, but it was bang on the money, wasn't it?

I thought so. Reading Diamond's arguments on any subject is exactly like reading an Economist article on the same subject - market-centric to a fault, lacking any engagement with social realities, and still praying at the shrine of a couple of dead Austrians whose economics were proven wanting over and again in the last quarter of the 20th century.
 
And there you go again. Lazy, insulting, inaccurate drivel from a blazing, arrogant hypocrite.
Before you permabann him (and I can understand the temptation) let him/her explain why London should be handed over to speculators and the population be driven out?
 
Is localist even a thing???

And it's clearly not fair that people are priced out of their neighbourhoods because property speculators/buy-to-let landlords/greedy scumlords have pushed the housing prices up out of people's price ranges.

It's not just London that's been affected by this, Edinburgh has similar issues too.
 
I thought so. Reading Diamond's arguments on any subject is exactly like reading an Economist article on the same subject - market-centric to a fault, lacking any engagement with social realities, and still praying at the shrine of a couple of dead Austrians whose economics were proven wanting over and again in the last quarter of the 20th century.
Name names, why don't you:D
 
Is localist even a thing???

And it's clearly not fair that people are priced out of their neighbourhoods because property speculators/buy-to-let landlords/greedy scumlords have pushed the housing prices up out of people's price ranges.

It's not just London that's been affected by this, Edinburgh has similar issues too.
True, but let's be fair, it seems to be a bigger issue there, it's happening in most big cities but it's absolutely rank in London.
 
I want to re-iterate - who determines and on what basis, who can live in London and why?

Currently, the finance-biased entity known as "the market".
Who should determine it, is what matters, and unless "the market" realises the socio-economic necessity of affordable and social-rent housing, then "it" (and consequently those exploiting it) is going to make the same mistake that was made in Rome 1800 years ago, and in every city since - that a city necessarily requires decent housing for the manual workers and clerks and bog-cleaners as well as for the professional classes and the ruling class, and that attempting (whether directly or indirectly) to confine the plebs to ghettoes often goes horribly wrong.
 
I thought so. Reading Diamond's arguments on any subject is exactly like reading an Economist article on the same subject - market-centric to a fault, lacking any engagement with social realities, and still praying at the shrine of a couple of dead Austrians whose economics were proven wanting over and again in the last quarter of the 20th century.

Wonderful. So I am simply from the Austrian school then? Quite remarkable stuff from someone who appears to know very little about what he refers to.
 
Von Mises and von Hayek. Worth a read if only to marvel at their wishful thinking and avoidance of social realities. :)

If you are inquiring by the way, the most impressive economist that I have recently seen present is David S. Evans.

I'm not sure whether he falls within the "Austrian School" but perhaps you have an opinion on that which you would like to share?
 
Before you permabann him (and I can understand the temptation) let him/her explain why London should be handed over to speculators and the population be driven out?

On what basis would a permaban work? Because I'm inconvenient...?
 
You made an insinuation - aka an implicit accusation.

No, it is others who read that how they wanted to.

My point was clear - one person was singled out from three, their words were exaggerated to make a divisive point and they happened to be foreign/other.

To understand the point more directly you can work step by step back through the previous sentence (starting at the end).
 
Wonderful. So I am simply from the Austrian school then? Quite remarkable stuff from someone who appears to know very little about what he refers to.

You haven't bothered to read my post properly, have you? If you had, you'd have noted that I didn't either say or imply that you're "simply from the Austrian school".
Quite remarkable inaccuracy (at best) or misrepresentation (at worst) from someone who claims to be a lawyer.;)
 
You haven't bothered to read my post properly, have you? If you had, you'd have noted that I didn't either say or imply that you're "simply from the Austrian school".
Quite remarkable inaccuracy (at best) or misrepresentation (at worst) from someone who claims to be a lawyer.;)

So what is your position then, if you mind pinning it down more precisely?

Because, forgive me if I got the wrong end of the stick, but I thought you were making a play at a neo-liberal caricature?
 
No, it is others who read that how they wanted to.

My point was clear - one person was singled out from three, their words were exaggerated to make a divisive point and they happened to be foreign/other.

To understand the point more directly you can work step by step back through the previous sentence (starting at the end).

Weasel words.
 
Not really sure why this is relevant to this conversation or any conversation on these boards to be frank but, yes, I have been qualified for around 2.5 years now.

And you and why do you ask?
People keep referring to you as a lawyer so I was interested in whether you actually were yet. I dont know if it's relevant or not, what's your practice?
 
People keep referring to you as a lawyer so I was interested in whether you actually were yet. I dont know if it's relevant or not, what's your practice?

I'm pretty sure that I've set this out before but my main practice area at work is competition, antitrust and trade regulation.

But I also do quite a lot of work in IP (mainly hard IP stuff around telecoms/standards and pharma) and am now getting increasingly involved in financial regulation but coming at it from a concurrent antitrust pov.

Pro bono wise my main stuff is, in contrast, employment (unfair dismissal etc) and housing.
 
I'm pretty sure that I've set this out before but my main practice area at work is competition, antitrust and trade regulation.

But I also do quite a lot of work in IP (mainly hard IP stuff around telecoms/standards and pharma) and am now getting increasingly involved in financial regulation but coming at it from a concurrent antitrust pov.

Pro bono wise my main stuff is, in contrast, employment (unfair dismissal etc) and housing.
Band?
 
Back
Top Bottom