UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
Or just not bothering with Bixby at all.
Well yes.
But they've found space for another hardware button, which is potentially quite useful.
Or just not bothering with Bixby at all.
Nope, never ever said anything remotely like that. Why are you trying to pick a daft fight? I do think it is fucking annoying to have a phone without a headphone socket though, and it's a backward step in usability for most consumers who like to charge and listen to music at the same time.That the headphone jack is the most amazing thing ever and is why Android phones will reign supreme for years to come?
Can be done without having to unlock the phone, or even look at it. Can be done by touch in your pocket if need be. It's great.The very very worst method of silencing a phone is the apple hardware button. It's fucking shite.
Can be done without having to unlock the phone, or even look at it. Can be done by touch in your pocket if need be. It's great.
Nope, as the below messages point out...but at least they have justified it by stating that it's to ensure the phone is waterproof.
weird as my waterproof Sony has a headphone jack...
Also, HTC (who made the Pixel) have their own devices which are waterproof and have headphone jacks. It's bullshit cost cutting/differential/whatever.S8 is waterproof too, with headphone jack
This is not a Nexus phone.Nexus phones are usually underwhelming in the face of Samsung's best product and this is no exception.
Funny that, because it's one of the most complained about 'features' of iOS/iPhones on the Apple forums I read.Some fundamental bits of the stock Android experience are really poor, like taking your phone on/off silent.
iPhone: switch on the side
Samsung: three-phase ringer/vibrate/silent control in the top bar there by default
Android: No top bar control for this as such. Instead we have Do Not Disturb, which has its own configuration and implications beyond just sound. You can use the volume buttons to move between vibrate and sounds instead except you'll then have to set your ringer volume manually each time and bleeuuughhhh...
Give me TouchWiz every time!
Meh, it's the same thing, you know what I mean. Revolving-door contract manufactured phones with vanilla Android. They're rarely brilliant, and not surprisingly so.This is not a Nexus phone.
On Android, using the hardware volume controls, you can only set the media volume (YouTube and the like) once the media content begins playing. Before that it sets the ringer volume instead.Also, someone posted this 'relevant' XKCD but I don't get it? xkcd: Ringer Volume/Media Volume
Ish. They've replaced Nexus phones, but they're very different things. I know you know all the following, but anyway..Meh, it's the same thing, you know what I mean. Revolving-door contract manufactured phones with vanilla Android. They're rarely brilliant, and not surprisingly so.
On Android, using the hardware volume controls, you can only set the media volume (YouTube and the like) once the media content begins playing. Before that it sets the ringer volume instead.
As on all Android phones, but that's not just using hardware controls.Not on my Nexus 6p, there's a drop down menu to choose between ringer, media and alarm volume
As on all Android phones, but that's not just using hardware controls.
Whaaat? Fucked up indeed - I hate Motorola software.Not on my shitty Moto 4g (currently using it after breaking my 6P). You have to go into settings which is fucked up. That's Android doing that though.
Whaaat? Fucked up indeed - I hate Motorola software.
I just tried it on an emulator and you're right. WTF were they thinking?It's Android v5.1 that is doing it.
It's Android v5.1 that is doing it. But fuck motorola too, the phone is fucking shit.
Is that true?or is there a consistent experience across iterations of hardware, unlike buying into Apple or Samsung product families, because the contract is revolving, presumably to spread the wealth amongst the Android manufacturing ecosystem.
If we limit this to the Pixel range, there's not enough evidence yet to say either way. Don't forget the Pixel C too - not sure who actually made that.Is that true?
When it was a Nexus, fair enough, But now it's a Pixel, which is Google designed - not just endorsed - then surely it's going to be consistent? HTC made the Pixel 1 and Pixel XL. They've also made the Pixel 2 but the Pixel 2 XL is manufactured by LG. If I didn't know that (and I didn't until just Googling now), I'd think they were made by the same people (the XLs).
Google made it themselves, apparently. Which I find hard to believe?If we limit this to the Pixel range, there's not enough evidence yet to say either way. Don't forget the Pixel C too - not sure who actually made that.
Bloody hellGoogle Pixel 2 reviewed: Sets new record for overall smartphone camera quality - DxOMark
Impressive for a single lens. New highest score, topping the iPhone 8 Plus and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 which had scores of 94.
Seems cameras really seem to be where the competitive nature of these phones are going.
Nexus phones were 'dev phones', which were meant to be the reference model for the next version of Android. They were never meant to be aimed at the general public, and that's why they sometimes lagged behind in grunt or camera quality. They were also cheap, which helped the devs so that Google could get more apps in the app store, when the iOS/Android wars were still being fought on things like number of apps.