Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How bad is your mobile phone signal?

These speed test results don't really answer the question... I can often get very fast speeds too, but 5 minutes later or two streets away it's a different matter.

I just tested where I am now and got 200 or so, but then a few minutes later its flip-flopping between LTE and 5g with only one bar showing.

What seems to have changed in the last year or so is that the signal seems to be very inconsistent and all over the shop, even if your location isn't changing. And if you are on the move, it will go from fine to nonexistent in a quite unpredictable way that doesn't really seem to be related to how close or directly visible the nearest mast is.
 
These speed test results don't really answer the question... I can often get very fast speeds too, but 5 minutes later or two streets away it's a different matter.

I just tested where I am now and got 200 or so, but then a few minutes later its flip-flopping between LTE and 5g with only one bar showing.

What seems to have changed in the last year or so is that the signal seems to be very inconsistent and all over the shop, even if your location isn't changing. And if you are on the move, it will go from fine to nonexistent in a quite unpredictable way that doesn't really seem to be related to how close or directly visible the nearest mast is.
The mast you're seeing might not be used by your provider.
 
O2’s data has gone from being useable pretty much everywhere I went a year or 2 back to now being so unreliable I’ve added a second PAYG sim from EE just to get online when I really need to, between the 2 of them I get maybe 80% chance of success which is shite tbh
 
You don't say.
I do, because you seem confused.
And if you are on the move, it will go from fine to nonexistent in a quite unpredictable way that doesn't really seem to be related to how close or directly visible the nearest mast is.
Just because a mast is visible doesn't mean it will have any bearing on the strength of your phone signal, because, you know...
 
Currently I have two bars of 5G in central London. on EE. Rubbish speeds. Take ages even just to load up Speedtest. If I switch off 5G, and just use 4G it goes up to full signal I get over three times the download speed and over ten times the upload speed.

What's the point in even switching on 5G. I may as well save the battery and get better speeds.

Look at this. Two minutes apart.

IMG_5929.jpeg

IMG_5930.jpeg
 
Just because a mast is visible doesn't mean it will have any bearing on the strength of your phone signal, because, you know...

Until relatively recently, when I had bad or no signal, there was usually some relatively obvious reason for it.

In rural areas, it would be that I was out of a direct line of sight from a mast that carried my provider's signal. In certain locations that I visit often, I know exactly which masts carry the signal and I generally know where there's a direct line of sight. So I'd know roughly where I'd need to go to to get a good (or any) signal.

In urban areas, if the signal was bad it would very often be that I'd be in some location with tall buildings all around. In those cases I wouldn't know the exact location of masts but I'd know that if I moved somewhere a bit less enclosed, then generally the signal would improve.

What's changed, is that the causes of bad signal have become much less obvious. Moving my physical location doesn't reliably improve things, like it usually would in the past. Why the signal is sometimes good and sometimes bad has become much more of a mystery.
 
I can't get any network signal at my house any more, stopped on all networks about six months ago. They said a mast was down.

I hop on to next door's WiFi (cheers to them) and roam with Giffgaff on the O2 network I think, but it's an expensive way to just go and walk away from home with me mobile.

Something is going on anyway, that's my deep summise.
We are with Giffgaff, £6.00 a month unlimited calls and texts.

They went unlimited the first month of lockdown, Mary used 960 minutes. I used zero. :)
 
I have a dual SIM phone so I can keep my UK number live, only really use it for two-factor stuff. Have to remember to text occasionally as it's giffgaff and would lapse.
Set up your Giffgaff for the £6.00 a month option, automatically renewing. There are months where I don't make any calls. (Giffgaff to Giffgaff doesn't count).
 
Set up your Giffgaff for the £6.00 a month option, automatically renewing. There are months where I don't make any calls. (Giffgaff to Giffgaff doesn't count).
I don't even need that; stuck a tenner on a couple of years ago and that's lasted with the occasional text to keep it live, then a goody bag to cover a visit home.
 
These speed test results don't really answer the question... I can often get very fast speeds too, but 5 minutes later or two streets away it's a different matter.
That's inevitable within a built up area though.

When I'm out and about I never get my phone out the rucksack so I have no idea what signal strength is like while I'm on the move. Walking around using a phone is dangerous anyway - you could get run over by not paying attention, or amuse passers by when you walk into a lamppost.
 
What's changed, is that the causes of bad signal have become much less obvious. Moving my physical location doesn't reliably improve things, like it usually would in the past. Why the signal is sometimes good and sometimes bad has become much more of a mystery.
Not really. I've already dropped a hint. You can't just look at a mast and assume that you should get a great signal.

What has changed is 4G/LTE and 5G. They use beamforming and MIMO to dynamically adapt the beam pattern (and thus signal strength at the handset) on the fly. This will be driven by subscriber demand (and class) and, consequently as that grows towards the hardware limit, be further modulated by traffic management policies.
 
You can't just look at a mast and assume that you should get a great signal.
To me, that means that the whole thing would inevitably become somewhat more mysterious from the point of view of the phone user. Which is exactly what seems to be happening in practice.
 
It's been so bad I bought a new phone thinking that was the problem, and then obviously found out it wasn't. Going to bite the bullet and reinstall a landline when I have the time
 
Good article here on how bad it is....


1724932362155.png

At present, British networks are rolling out 5G hardware on top of existing 4G installations, and are using mid-band frequencies which are not as fast as other countries, says Liz Parry, CEO of telecoms service support company LifeCycle Software.

The process of replacing Huawei equipment with those from other vendors such as Ericsson and Nokia is time-consuming and costly, Parry says.

Andy Aitken, co-founder and CEO of UK telecoms network Honest, says, "The reason 5G speeds aren't living up to the hype yet is because the networks needed for it just aren’t fully up and running. The big telecom companies still need to expand their infrastructure, which will cost billions.
 
I visited family in the uk recently, was like going back in time ten years as mobile data network was so slow 😩

I just ran a Speedtest on my 5G connection here. As I might have mentioned once or a millionty & two times on various threads, I’m in Sweden
IMG_4367.png
 
Back
Top Bottom