krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Ooooooh. I love the original. Much more fun than that dour overextended humourless SW franchise
The original 1930s serial isn't particularly humorous.
Ooooooh. I love the original. Much more fun than that dour overextended humourless SW franchise
the original film that is the subject of this threadThe original 1930s serial isn't particularly humorous.
the original film that is the subject of this thread
it is original in the context of it being THE FILM IN THE OP. stop being a dickIt's not original, though. Fun as it is.
it is original in the context of it being THE FILM IN THE OP. stop being a dick
Yes but the new film isn't a remake of the 1980s film, it's a remake of the original strip, and that is what was being discussed.it is original in the context of it being THE FILM IN THE OP. stop being a dick
If you insist on splitting hairs, John Carpenter's The Thing was a more faithful adaptation of Who Goes There ? by John Campbell Jr. than The Thing from Another World from 1951 and it commonly gets referred to as a remake. It usually comes up when the best remakes of all time are discussed. So it's not wrong to refer to this upcoming version as a remake of the 1980 film (and not the serials, which essentially were a different medium).Yes but the new film isn't a remake of the 1980s film, it's a remake of the original strip, and that is what was being discussed.
As is the planet of the apes remake and the ending everyone hated. All totally fine by me, but what was being discussed here was the new film which is looking back to the original material, I don't think it is splitting hairs to say, that they are not remaking the 1980s film or story, they are making another flash gordon film.If you insist on splitting hairs, John Carpenter's The Thing was a more faithful adaptation of Who Goes There ? by John Campbell Jr. than The Thing from Another World from 1951 and it commonly gets referred to as a remake. It usually comes up when the best remakes of all time are discussed. So it's not wrong to refer to this upcoming version as a remake of the 1980 film.
Merely repeating yourself doesn't give your argument more weight. Lets resume this discussion when the film is out, which will in all likelihood be about Flash Gordon saving the earth from Ming the Merciless......again !As is the planet of the apes remake and the ending everyone hated. All totally fine by me, but what was being discussed here was the new film which is looking back to the original material, I don't think it is splitting hairs to say, that they are not remaking the 1980s film or story, they are making another flash gordon film.
Like the comic strip.Merely repeating yourself doesn't give your argument more weight. Lets resume this discussion when the film is out, which will in all likelihood be about Flash Gordon saving the earth from Ming the Merciless......again !
I don't know the 50s tv series, but I saw some of the movie serials from the 30s which I remember being shown on tv when the film came out. The film is quite faithful to that. There only is so much amusement to be had from toy rockets wobbling along on strings though.
There was one summer when I was a kid and every evening RTE played the old Flash Gordon black and white series followed by the original Star Trek series.
It was great!!
Eta ..they also played Harold Lloyds old comedies
I thought that was every summer. There was Flash Gordon but also some other sci-fi from the same period (am original creation at the time I think)There was one summer when I was a kid and every evening RTE played the old Flash Gordon black and white series followed by the original Star Trek series.
It was great!!
Eta ..they also played Harold Lloyds old comedies
I thought that was every summer. There was Flash Gordon but also some other sci-fi from the same period (am original creation at the time I think)
'Hooray for Harold Lloyd' was channel 4 in the afternoons I think. It was basically highlights. If you saw the original films as a kid you would know, they are super long and a bit tedious apart from the said highlights.
Nope, Harold Lloyd's films aren't tedious, they are classics and they were wonderfully inventive.I thought that was every summer. There was Flash Gordon but also some other sci-fi from the same period (am original creation at the time I think)
'Hooray for Harold Lloyd' was channel 4 in the afternoons I think. It was basically highlights. If you saw the original films as a kid you would know, they are super long and a bit tedious apart from the said highlights.
Four years and two pages snd I’m the first to go:
Flash: A-Ah!
I thought that was every summer. There was Flash Gordon but also some other sci-fi from the same period (am original creation at the time I think)
'Hooray for Harold Lloyd' was channel 4 in the afternoons I think. It was basically highlights. If you saw the original films as a kid you would know, they are super long and a bit tedious apart from the said highlights.
I got a box set of all his films on DVD to review. Arse numbing stuff. . . . . "Finally, that fucking clock!".It was on BBC2 and predated Channel 4 by several years . Seems Harold Lloyd retained all the rights to his work and charged channels big money to show them. HFHL - was pretty much recycling pieces of a 1962 film (itself composed of highlights) called “Harold Lloyd’s World of Laughter”.
I still can't believe someone ever got you to review films. Those poor readers !I got a box set of all his films on DVD to review. Arse numbing stuff. . . . . "Finally, that fucking clock!".
The wonderful and inventive bits are truly great, but they are surrounded by very very long periods of uninteresting camerawork and dull plot. Lots of talking too, or rather on screen captions, that really slows it down.Nope, Harold Lloyd's films aren't tedious, they are classics and they were wonderfully inventive.
I done it on the telly like. Watch some clips, a couple of words, put the kettle on, bish bosh.I still can't believe someone ever got you to review films. Those poor readers !
Oh no. * ¢r∆πiuM |m¶l0d€$ *By the time the new film comes out, the 1980 film will be about as old as the 1930s films were in 1980.
Someone call call Ken Loach !Would rather the comic strip/Buster Crabbe series be realised in full glory, though.
Sure, there's been misfires but maybe Taiko Waititi is too obvious a choice?
Will still watch, mind.
Someone call call Ken Loach !
The original director for the 1980 film was Nicolas Roeg. Unfortunately Dino De Laurentiis fired him after a year of preproduction.