Imagine, for instance, that you buy a Rick and Morty–themed skin for your digital avatar in the video game Fortnite. That’s currently possible, but only by purchasing 1,500 of Fortnite’s in-game currency V-Bucks. Suiting up as Rick Sanchez only works in the popular battle royale shooter. A Metaverse infrastructure would theoretically enable you to transfer the digital outfit to wear it at an online Lady Gaga concert (planned for Fortnite next year) or during a group Peloton workout with friends.
Let’s say you took the prank too far, and the boss is annoyed that you show up to a real-life meeting as the cartoon scientist, which everyone sees through their Ray-Ban smart glasses. You then sheepishly decide to trade the costume for currency in the form of a “Cool Cats” non-fungible token (NFT) and a handful of Dogecoin. Or perhaps the opposite happens, and you come to love it so much that you want to not only keep the Rick skin forever, but put it in your will and pass it on to your kids when you die. All of this and more would be possible in the Metaverse.
If this vision sounds like something ripped from the pages of a science-fiction novel, that’s because it was.
The Gargoylification of Society
The term Metaverse first appears in Neal Stephenson’s 1992 novel Snow Crash, which follows the futuristic adventures of Hiro, a pizza delivery driver for the Mafia who moonlights as a hacker, immersed in what’s described as “a computer-generated universe that his computer is drawing onto his goggles and pumping into his earphones.”
The book has long been a Bible for the priests of high tech. Stephenson is revered as a prophet, credited for inventing the concepts of avatars and cryptocurrency in addition to the Metaverse. Snow Crash was once required reading for Facebook’s management team. Stephenson was befriended by Bezos and hired by the augmented reality company Magic Leap in 2014 to help actually build the Metaverse.
Apparently, no one in Silicon Valley has a sense of irony. Snow Crash is a dystopian novel, not a utopian one.
The digital realms of Snow Crash’s Metaverse are even more insidious than the playground-like purgatories it helped inspire in pop culture offerings like the Matrix movies or the novel Ready Player One...
Some users log in and out of terminals in Snow Crash, but “gargoyles,” a class of characters who wear reality-enhancing devices at all times, never truly do. For gargoyles, who inhabit the Metaverse at all times, there is no “logging on” and “logging off.” Stephenson writes:
Gargoyles are no fun to talk to. They never finish a sentence. They are adrift in a laser-drawn world, scanning retinas in all directions, doing background checks on everyone within a thousand yards, seeing everything in visual light, infrared, millimeter-wave radar, and ultrasound all at once.
By making real designs to usher in the Metaverse, Silicon Valley is trying to turn us all into gargoyles.
The focus of this discussion is Facebook, a company with a 2.91 billion monthly user base. You and your experian file is 1 person. Your post is approximately 3 billion times less relevant than those before. Kind of impressiveOooooh, they have a file on me. I wonder how many pennies it nets them. I live in the south-east, I don't think I'll ever be rich enough to worry about buying a house. My shithouse credit rating has never been an obstacle for getting tenancies before. It's not like I'm ever going to be renting from Snobcunt and Sons.
"Meta" or possibly "MetaCorp" sounds like the name a writer of dystopian science fiction would have given a company like Facebook from the beginning.
Clegg and Zuckerberg would definitely fail the Turing Test
1:30 - "Put people first" comes last in their list of principles
Don't encourage them.Now is a seriously good time to buy FB stock
Now is a seriously good time to buy FB stock
not joking, actually bought some stock after mentioning it.Not sure if you are joking?
Meta Platforms does trade at a bit of a discount compared with other large tech companies.
The UK’s competition regulator has officially ruled that Facebook parent company Meta’s acquisition of Giphy should be unwound, a year and a half after the social media giant first said it was acquiring the popular GIF-making and sharing website. In a press release, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said that it had come to the decision after its investigation found an acquisition could harm competition between social media platforms, and that its concerns “can only be addressed by Facebook selling Giphy in its entirety to an approved buyer.”
Meta ordered to sell Giphy by UK regulator
Following the release of preliminary findings in August.www.theverge.com
Facebook’s negligence facilitated the genocide of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar after the social media network’s algorithms amplified hate speech and the platform failed to take down inflammatory posts, according to legal action launched in the US and the UK.
“In the end, there was so little for Facebook to gain from its continued presence in Burma, and the consequences for the Rohingya people could not have been more dire. Yet, in the face of this knowledge, and possessing the tools to stop it, it simply kept marching forward.”
I haven't seen it in action but I'm sure it's as crap as you say .. The only saving grace is that it might be early days and they are getting in there early.They showed a version of what the Metaverse might look like last night and it appeared to be really shit. The graphics were awful for a start. I didn't really see the point and it didn't seem that original either.
Who are they hoping takes this up because they were trying to promote it as an alternative working space. Can't see our safeguarding meetings taking place in this environment to be honest.
That being said I suspect I am not the target audience and they are hoping forward thinking creative types take it on as well as current social media users?
I bet they'll turn out to have copyrighted something that's copylefted. I do hope soThere was something in Private Eye I think that Meta have been hoovering up all the copyrights for anything involved with it.
They showed a version of what the Metaverse might look like last night and it appeared to be really shit. The graphics were awful for a start. I didn't really see the point and it didn't seem that original either.
Who are they hoping takes this up because they were trying to promote it as an alternative working space. Can't see our safeguarding meetings taking place in this environment to be honest.
That being said I suspect I am not the target audience and they are hoping forward thinking creative types take it on as well as current social media users?