1%er
Well-Known Member
The Horner case
Things are slowly dripping out about this case. It appears that the investigation into Horner started 4 weeks before it ever became public, Red Bull were looking into Horner at the beginning of January when the allegations were first made, but it only hit the news when De Telegraaf published the story on the 5th of February. Red Bull did not specify what the allegations were in its initial statement confirming the investigation. The charges were characterised internally as “controlling” possibly “coercive” behaviour. The word on the street is that Horner was looking for sexual favours and there were WhatsApp messages and pictures offered as evidence.
There has been a power struggle at Red Bull racing since the death of Red Bull co-founder Dietrich Mateschitz in October 2022, who always backed Horner against others who wanted Horner to have less power. Martin Brundle talked about this rift on Sky F1 and pointed out that the new Red Bull racing chief executive Oliver Mintzlaff wanted more control over the UK operation. Rumours begin circulating that Mark Mateschitz, son of Dietrich, who owns 49 per cent of the energy drink company, was in favour of getting rid of Horner, while Chalerm Yoovidhya, eldest son of Chaleo Yoovidhya, co-creator of Red Bull, was in favour of keeping him, quickly began to spread.
There were then further runours that Horner had fallen out with Helmut Marko and Jos Verstappen who wanted him out. There is evidence that the claimant is understood to have had a close relationship with Verstappen Snr. and that relationship went back to at least 2021. It is believed by many that it was Verstappen Snr. who leaked the story to De Telegraaf and that he and Marko were working together to get rid of Horner.
It is being claimed that because the claimant was very much involved in the WhatsApp messages and pictures, and in that chain of messages there was no evidence of controlling or coercive behaviour by Horner, also that both parties were consenting adults so there is no case to answer for Horner. He wasn't her boss and as she did not work for Red Bull racing (she worked for Red Bull GmbH) so he had no undue influence over her. As I said above I believe this story has not run it course and there is plenty to still come out, unless Horner, Marko and Verstappen Snr. can sortout their differences I see many more leaks and news leaking out.
[My view not a news story]
Things are slowly dripping out about this case. It appears that the investigation into Horner started 4 weeks before it ever became public, Red Bull were looking into Horner at the beginning of January when the allegations were first made, but it only hit the news when De Telegraaf published the story on the 5th of February. Red Bull did not specify what the allegations were in its initial statement confirming the investigation. The charges were characterised internally as “controlling” possibly “coercive” behaviour. The word on the street is that Horner was looking for sexual favours and there were WhatsApp messages and pictures offered as evidence.
There has been a power struggle at Red Bull racing since the death of Red Bull co-founder Dietrich Mateschitz in October 2022, who always backed Horner against others who wanted Horner to have less power. Martin Brundle talked about this rift on Sky F1 and pointed out that the new Red Bull racing chief executive Oliver Mintzlaff wanted more control over the UK operation. Rumours begin circulating that Mark Mateschitz, son of Dietrich, who owns 49 per cent of the energy drink company, was in favour of getting rid of Horner, while Chalerm Yoovidhya, eldest son of Chaleo Yoovidhya, co-creator of Red Bull, was in favour of keeping him, quickly began to spread.
There were then further runours that Horner had fallen out with Helmut Marko and Jos Verstappen who wanted him out. There is evidence that the claimant is understood to have had a close relationship with Verstappen Snr. and that relationship went back to at least 2021. It is believed by many that it was Verstappen Snr. who leaked the story to De Telegraaf and that he and Marko were working together to get rid of Horner.
It is being claimed that because the claimant was very much involved in the WhatsApp messages and pictures, and in that chain of messages there was no evidence of controlling or coercive behaviour by Horner, also that both parties were consenting adults so there is no case to answer for Horner. He wasn't her boss and as she did not work for Red Bull racing (she worked for Red Bull GmbH) so he had no undue influence over her. As I said above I believe this story has not run it course and there is plenty to still come out, unless Horner, Marko and Verstappen Snr. can sortout their differences I see many more leaks and news leaking out.
[My view not a news story]
Last edited: