Definitely worth a watch, bit grim but with some hope.
Oh god, I don't know if I can watch this.
And repetive bleats from politicians which aren't supported by actionsAgree. I don't think I can watch it. Having taken on the IPCC report in 2018, alerted by my daughter to it, I got very panicked about it. I have thought about it every day since and experience a lot of dissonance between my comfortable standard of living (water, shelter, food, heat) to think of what will come soon and how to cope with that. And also that many have been experiencing this for years and are increasingly fleeing homelands bc if it . And even in uk, some are experiencing repetitive floods in recent years.
TotallyAnd repetive bleats from politicians which aren't supported by actions
'Zactly... why depress myself when in all honesty it's their job to work on this. I do what I can but it's on an extremely local, household and personal level, constrained by my money and influence (or lack of).And repetive bleats from politicians which aren't supported by actions
You have a point, but I took the message that we could still avert the worst of it, if we acted now, and programs like this are likely to affect people's priorities. After all it was a similar program that woke me certainly to plastic in the oceans.What's the hope?! I know the mountain gorillas project was good, but how's that an indicator of a global hope?
Utah PhillipsThe Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.
it's not trying particularly hard or there wouldn't be such an increase in the human population while so many other species see their populations catastophically declineI will not watch this as I am already fully aware of the condition of the planet.
After reading the Gaia hypothesis forwarded by James Lovelock and the climate calamities of the last few years, I fear that as a living organism the planet is trying to eradicate the parasites and destroyers. Sadly innocent species suffer too.
The way things are looking I am certain something is in the pipeline, pun intended.it's not trying particularly hard or there wouldn't be such an increase in the human population while so many other species see their populations catastophically decline
i just wish they'd hurry upThe way things are looking I am certain something is in the pipeline, pun intended.
I wouldn’t for one second accept the concept that the earth is capable of an emotional reaction like revenge. It’s just chemistry that maintains the balance and sustains life as we know it.Climate change denialism is bad enough without other people over-correcting into nonsense ideas about Gaia's revenge.
tbh it's all fucked and those of us who are likely to die before 2050 are likely to thank our lucky stars given what's probably going to come afterwards. bury me on a hill, tho, as i don't suppose my swimming will be any better once i'm dead than it is now.I wouldn’t for one second accept the concept that the earth is capable of an emotional reaction like revenge. It’s just chemistry that maintains the balance and sustains life as we know it.
Armbands mate, recommend them. Though lethal if placed around ankles.tbh it's all fucked and those of us who are likely to die before 2050 are likely to thank our lucky stars given what's probably going to come afterwards. bury me on a hill, tho, as i don't suppose my swimming will be any better once i'm dead than it is now.
I wouldn’t for one second accept the concept that the earth is capable of an emotional reaction like revenge. It’s just chemistry that maintains the balance and sustains life as we know it.
then when we make johnson dive alongside the penguins they shall be tied thusArmbands mate, recommend them. Though lethal if placed around ankles.
Possibly, though I will be long gone before the full effects kick in.The notion of balance is not one that maps very well to natural history as we understand it. "Balanced" systems don't produce a series of ices ages of varying intensity ranging from "ooh it's a bit colder these few millennia" all the way to "ice fields nearly reaching the equator". The cycle of supercontinents produces radically different climates depending on how the continents are arranged. Throughout all this paleoclimatic wobbling is the constant background hum of evolution and extinction. Mass extinctions aren't balanced and are not a new phenomenon.
yeh but i still don't want to watch a programme about the mass extinction.The notion of balance is not one that maps very well to natural history as we understand it. "Balanced" systems don't produce a series of ices ages of varying intensity ranging from "ooh it's a bit colder these few millennia" all the way to "ice fields nearly reaching the equator". The cycle of supercontinents produces radically different climates depending on how the continents are arranged. Throughout all this paleoclimatic wobbling is the constant background hum of evolution and extinction. Mass extinctions aren't balanced and are not a new phenomenon.
Possibly, though I will be long gone before the full effects kick in.
added to the list of former people. they can be planted in antarctica so they can see climate change in action.I think it's reasonable to say that we're already observing the effects of human activity on the climate, in the sense that you don't have to read scientific papers to see it with your own eyes. It certainly seems to me like we get more intense rainfall in the UK than we used to, and the changing of the seasons seem a bit fucked.
I don't think it's a coincidence that outright denialism has become increasingly untenable, hence the ridiculous arguments from fossil fuel lobbyists about how increasing atmospheric CO2 will be good for plant life.