Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Extinction Rebellion

Apologies I see what you mean.

Its not the impression Hallam gives when he mentions the report in his YouTube talks.

Interesting that the report also talks of non violent protests being more likely to topple a regime when met with a violent response. It may be that the goading of the state around Heathrow etc is Hallam's way of attempting to provoke this. Of course XR activists don't need to know that detail.
We argue that nonviolent resistance may have a strategic advantage over violent resistance for two reasons. First, repressing nonviolent campaigns may backfire. In backfire, an unjust act—often violent repression—recoils against its originators, often resulting in the breakdown of obedience among regime supporters, mobilization of the population against the regime, and international condemnation of the regime.
 
Excellent, the first one in particular. I'll be sharing that amongst local XR.


Yep, Daughter is off to some Climate thing which has a very specific protest (Drax) rather than an overarching and slightly inchoate emotional 'movement'. Not least because of the intersecting consequences of climate change on all aspects of social justice (Immigration, housing, health and welfare). The next stage is the difficult, local, on the ground and bottom-up organic work... because without solidarity and alliances, you have nothing. Everything (therefore everyone) is affected. Stitching it all together in coalitions requires a whole range of different tactics and languages.
 
To take the XR side small campaigns about specific issues are limited. They have being going on for years. People will protest about something that affects their backyard.

XR have successfully put the issue , despite Brexit, on the front pages. Even if only for a short while. No number of small local campaigns will do that.

If they do move in the direction of the Peace News article that will be a significant change in direction. Point of XR is to build mass non violent protest movement here to change government direction once and for all. Time is to short for building up in the grassroots taking time and energy in small local campaigns.
 
What do people think of their push for a Citizen's Assembly? A random group of peeps given power to make decision, taking views from experts etc.

Seems that this idea is presented without any push for a wider revolution, which means it will just sit in a capitalist context and be utterly worthless
 
What do people think of their push for a Citizen's Assembly? A random group of peeps given power to make decision, taking views from experts etc.

Seems that this idea is presented without any push for a wider revolution, which means it will just sit in a capitalist context and be utterly worthless
exactly
 
I think if it is was worthless that would be ok. It will be bad.

An unelected citizens assembly could end up being a figleaf for all sorts of horrors - the sort of dystopian "solutions" that Out of the Woods were hinting at. Technocratic erosion of democracy with a smile on its face.
 
What do people think of their push for a Citizen's Assembly? A random group of peeps given power to make decision, taking views from experts etc.

Seems that this idea is presented without any push for a wider revolution, which means it will just sit in a capitalist context and be utterly worthless
It's a horrible idea and basically technocracy with a bit of wool and glitter stuck on
 
because an authority based on random selection is at odds with an authority based on expertise and knowledge. The process they propose, afaict, is not based on expertise or technical knowledge. It's random selection of any joe blow in the country.
do you have any idea just how difficult it is to genuinely select people randomly?
 
because an authority based on random selection is at odds with an authority based on expertise and knowledge. The process they propose, afaict, is not based on expertise or technical knowledge. It's random selection of any joe blow in the country.

At least we'll have clear meeting minutes confirming that we *deserved* to go extinct.
 
Have we had this bizarre Telegraph piece where the leaders of extinction rebellion admit one of them made a mistake in being a revolutionary, and then they go into a bizarre rant about how just-in-time inventory practices are the real problem?

I'm sympathetic to so many people involved in XR but these two are such a liability and I fear they will end up letting a lot of people down.
 
That isn't really relevant to your question. I'm not advocating this at all. As I said I think it's a bad idea and I explained why.
it's the first question i've asked (the ? gives it away, you see) so i think it is relevant to my question. i haven't suggested you are advocating it.


selecting people at random - truly selecting people at random - can only really be done in a technologically advanced society and would imo mark your actual control of society by a technological elite because the people randomly selected would be reliant on their advice for what to do.
 
I think if it is was worthless that would be ok. It will be bad.

An unelected citizens assembly could end up being a figleaf for all sorts of horrors - the sort of dystopian "solutions" that Out of the Woods were hinting at. Technocratic erosion of democracy with a smile on its face.

Coincidence that this is being pushed when liberal democracy is showing signs of losing its grip?
 
selecting people at random - truly selecting people at random - can only really be done in a technologically advanced society and would imo mark your actual control of society by a technological elite because the people randomly selected would be reliant on their advice for what to do.

Capture.JPG
 
Back
Top Bottom