lucillemara
Member
one might even say, if one were so inclined, that it is always already
Possibly...who knows. if you live in London, quite possibly.oh i think we've seen you somewhere before, my lovely
yes, and very very good at it, that's why they are the state and you aren't.the state is already violent heeby
i have not made the claim it willPossibly...who knows. if you live in London, quite possibly.
But come on lets hear how smashing up MacDonalds will bring the state to its knees
yes, and very very good at it, that's why they are the state and you aren't.
So please outline a scenario where the use of violence by this 'extinction-rebellion group will achieve anything useful?i have not made the claim it will
yes it has a virtual monopoly on it and fighting is always violence whether or not you think it ethical.so good that you could even say it has monopoly on violence, and there's nothing violent about fighting back unless you think its monopoly is legitimated by the fact that it exists
if they were to machine-gun the cabinet it would do no harm.So please outline a scenario where the use of violence by this 'extinction-rebellion group will achieve anything useful?
yeh it's something you could learn to emulateso you do have some good practical suggestions not just snarky rejoinders
i think you'll find the relevant standard is iso 75822not to your highly exacting but totally inscrutable standards I'm sure
As I thought...just silly responsesif they were to machine-gun the cabinet it would do no harm.
so you do have some good practical suggestions not just snarky rejoinders
They're better responses than you deserveAs I thought...just silly responses
How soon the Bolsheviks are forgottenyes...Convince the electorate to back you then win a General Election and then perform well enough as a Government that people will continue electing you.
if you can't win an election you certainly can't win a civil war
That's not merely a silly post it's a fucking stupid postyes...Convince the electorate to back you then win a General Election and then perform well enough as a Government that people will continue electing you.
if you can't win an election you certainly can't win a civil war
yes...which you can't reply to so resort to idiocyThat's not merely a silly post it's a fucking stupid post
I have replied to it. Twice.yes...which you can't reply to so resort to idiocy
How soon the Bolsheviks are forgotten
Did they teach the Second World War at your school?Yeah....Russia wasn't exactly an established democracy in 1917 was it? You seriously think some sort of vanguard Leninists can defeat the government of any western nation? Or is it the forces of Anarchism?
They didDid they teach the Second World War at your school?
You must have missed the bit where they told you about the USSR defeating Germany thenThey did
rotflmaoYou must have missed the bit where they told you about the USSR defeating Germany then
The Bolsheviks / cpsu were a vanguardist partyrotflmao
You really descend to that sort of Nonsense. that as you well know was a country not a vanguardist party.
There is ZERO chance of a change of government by revolution in the UK
and you can't construct a scenario where its remotely possible. You are just Spanish Civil war larpers
The Bolsheviks / cpsu were a vanguardist party