Why would it be such a problem if it did, though? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's a bad thing per se. Surely there's room for all sorts, not just people whose musical tatstes are stuck somewhere between 1980 and 1990
But why would providing a broader range of genres of entertainment make it more mainstream or homogenised? I've been involved in the running of a local festival and it catered to all sorts of tastes without being in the least bit mainstream or homogenised.'77 and '82 ackshully
It wouldn't be a problem if there was that sort of thing, but having witnessed the homogenisation of festivals over recent years to the point you sometimes can't remember where the hell you are because you're amongst the same flags, the same traders, the same foodstalls, and the same acts, it's nice to find something a bit more 'niche'.
Anyway, I'll shut up now.
*post reported*
If TP had a problem with the lighting or lack of then it's not really up to us to question it. Just because none of us did is irrelevant. However, it's also important to question what such a small festival can reasonably do. They also need to be informed of issues so that they can address them within their available resources.
If TP had a problem with the lighting or lack of then it's not really up to us to question it. Just because none of us did is irrelevant. However, it's also important to question what such a small festival can reasonably do. They also need to be informed of issues so that they can address them within their available resources.
Yes, they do. As far as I'm aware even EiiD offer carer passes at their discretion.Although if mobility is a problem for teeps, maybe there is scope for her taking a companion to help, hold a torch etc. If festies provided reduced price tix for companions (2 for 1 maybe) then I'm sure it would help some of those with disabilities to attend. Do any festies do this?
Yes, they do. As far as I'm aware even EiiD offer carer passes at their discretion.
That's why I'm keen to emphasise "reasonable" adjustments. If there's money for lighting in trees (going back to teep's original observation) maybe there's some room for diverting some of that tree lighting to some ground lighting. It probably wouldn't even cost more.
Exactly.The tree lighting was outside the fence, probably for security reasons rather than for any aesthetic purpose. Security is probably something they have to take very seriously in order to be granted a licence.
The tree lighting was outside the fence, probably for security reasons rather than for any aesthetic purpose. Security is probably something they have to take very seriously in order to be granted a licence.
Ah yeah, I wasn't there so wasn't sure if the trees were draped in hippy fairy lights or Stalag 13 security lights or somewhere in between tbh
Are there any B & B's nearby?
No. You'd HAVE to camp
TBH, you'd miss so much if you buggered off to a B&B every night.
I couldn't camp and we won't even go into the toilet issues...
It was just an idea.
Very few hippy fairy lights thankfully
No, the tree lights were big fuck off halogens to light up the tree belt along one edge of the main arena, which would be the ideal place for someone to sneak in if it was dark.
I couldn't camp and we won't even go into the toilet issues...
It was just an idea.
btw, we were talking about you at the weekend.
I thnk the letting people in thing is possibly more to do with insurance than money making. They don't strike me as being in it for the bucks.Haha there's a commercial toss-up there re keeping people out v being a bit less scrupulous and letting them in and spend their money Shades of Glastonbury.
On the additional floor strip lighting though, I can't imagine it would break the bank.
Oh yeah?
Brilliant idea!You could take the B&B money and rent a camper van for the weekend (ok plus a bit more)
of course! we all wanted you to be there
You could take the B&B money and rent a camper van for the weekend (ok plus a bit more)
Brilliant idea!
I thnk the letting people in thing is possibly more to do with insurance than money making. They don't strike me as being in it for the bucks.