Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Egypt anti-government protests grow

Taking him to Cairo later this year.. Now that will be a great experience for him. He probably knows more about Egyptian politics than any ten year old in Britain (but not I bet in Egypt)

(((youngmasterdylans)))

:D

Can I come? Me and gsquare86 are already bosom buddies....
 
(((youngmasterdylans)))

:D

Can I come? Me and gsquare86 are already bosom buddies....

Sure. pack a bag for mid november.

(re your pm reminded me of something. Dot comm wrote to me recently with a similar suggestion but I couldn't write back to him because his in box is full. So if you are reading this Dot comm. EMPTY YOUR INBOX )
 
Excellent blog detailing the

The night the capital of Hell fell down !!

State Security headquarters in Nasr city is taken over by the people:

During the Mubarak era the state security HQ in Nasr city had this infamous reputation not only inside the country but also outside it. Its international infamousness was recognized when it turned out that the Bush administration used its secret cells and also the expertise of its infamous officers to interrogate its illegal detainees during its unholy war on terrorism.
The Egyptians called that big building in Nasr city district “The capital of hell” and you can imagine why Egyptians called it like that. A scary building any taxi driver will tell you horror stories about it and about the secret underground prison cells and torture rooms.
Tonight Egyptian protesters managed not to only to encircle the fearful building by thousands but they have also entered it for the first time not as detainees blindfolded but actually as victorious revolutionaries who had enough from that castle of terrorists. ...

Lots of pics and vids looks like a complete can of worms though unfortunately documents relating to torture and rendition have not been discovered; most likely shredded, moved or burned.
 
Thanks for that. I was just coming here to ask if anyone had a summary of what happened in SS in Alex as I had only had a glimpse of what was happening. It's a page or two back on that link. I'll catch up with Nasr now too.
 
The MB far from being a radical threat to democracy are a threat to democracy precisely because they are NOT radical.

A brilliant analysis dylans. I basically agree, I think that in power the MB would behave much like the AK party in Turkey. They´d Islamicize piecemeal, making sure not to get ahead of public opinion, and theyd be happy to work with the West. In these senses they are not at all radical, as you say.

However there is one issue over which the MN is most certainly radical by Western standards: Israel. They would adopt a far more hostile stance towards Israel than the West can accept. That´s why the West will do all it can to prevent them taking power.

It´s interesting to note how little Israel is mentioned in British debate about the mid east revolutions. The ultimate elephant in the drawing room.
 
What the hell is going on in Egypt just now? Twitter saying that there is a big kerfuffle at Amn Dawla Lazoughly (SS/MOI HQ Cairo) with army turning on protesters and 'thugs' (SS I suppose) attacking too. Started with peaceful protest 5 hours ago. Now calling for people to occupy Tahrir.

yasserseif Yasser Seif
Protests were peaceful, military gunshots were unnecessary, it escalated situation since sayeda zeinab neighborhood was already pissed.

occupiedcairo Occupied Cairo
As soon as army fired in air thugs threw glass and rocks and tears gas. Coordinated attack by army/amn el dawla

RamyYaacoub Ramy Yaacoub
At state security building, Lazoghly RT @waelabbas: the army used tasers and beat girls #Jan25 #Egypt

alaa Alaa Abd El Fattah
♻ @khalidabdalla: It was a downpour. I hate the confusion that follows. No one quite knows what happened, or what made them open fire.

AymanM Ayman Mohyeldin
Just drove into #lazoghly young men w machetes and steel rods roaming around.



Article on Lazoughly from the guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jan/24/alqaida.terrorism1

Where is Essam Sharaf?
 
However there is one issue over which the MN is most certainly radical by Western standards: Israel. They would adopt a far more hostile stance towards Israel than the West can accept. That´s why the West will do all it can to prevent them taking power.

It´s interesting to note how little Israel is mentioned in British debate about the mid east revolutions. The ultimate elephant in the drawing room.

Hostility to Israel is not an Islamist prerogative. It is an Arab one. Israel should indeed feel threatened by the events in Egypt (and across the middle East and North Africa) not because of the supposed "Islamist" threat but because any move to genuine self determination in the Arab world would inevitably reflect the universal hostility to Israel amongst Arabs. And for good reason. Israel represents a great injustice to their fellow Arabs.
 
Cheers for that post Dylans - very interesting. Certainly sounds like a plausible scenario.

With regards to Phildwyers point about the MBs hostility to Israel - as we have seen here - the lure of power is a powerful antedote to prinicples. The MB might continue to talk an anti-zionist game, but do next to nothing about it. They'd leave the dirty hands on collobaration to the Army - who would still get their paydirt from Uncle Sam in return.

A government consisting of the Muslim Brotherhood in an alliance with the military and international capital would be a sorry outcome for the revolution.
 
The position of the MB imo with regard to Israel is almost by the by inasmuch as the new Prime Minister Essam Sharaf is on the record as saying that he strongly opposes normalization of ties with Israel:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essam_Sharaf

http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/...tml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

As far as I can ascertain he has no ties with the MB, consequently and especially in light of his acceptance by the people it think it's fairly safe to say that he may reflect a common feeling amongst the populace that the current peace treaty with Israel is unacceptable.

Incidentally, according to this article:

Egypt gas still not flowing to Israel

The Israeli Ministry of Environment announced Friday that Egypt's supply of gas to Israel will not be resumed as anticipated following an attack on an oil pipeline in Northern Sinai on 5 February.

As a result of this delay, the Israeli Ministry of Environment permitted the use of fuel oil to run power stations to avoid a drop in the production of electricity.

Israel Yahom newspaper reported on the possibility of Egyptian authorities delaying gas export to Israel for political, not technical, reasons due to public pressure. Globus newspaper reported that Mirhav Company, the Israeli partner of Egypt's EMG that supplies gas to Israel, announced that gas pumping was not resumed as anticipated on 5 February.

It seems that gas flow will not be resumed by the end of this week. Shareholders in EMG approached their governments in the U.S., Thailand and Europe to encourage the Egyptian government to instruct the company to expedite renewed supply to Israel, read a company statement.

Israeli businessman Yossi Miman, a partner in EMG, said this week that gas will be pumped to Israel within days. He said he was convinced that gas flow to Israel, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon would be resumed as soon as the technical problems in the gas pipeline line are resolved.

"Agreements between Egypt and Israel allow for Israeli entities to purchase up to 7 billion cubic meters of Egyptian gas annually, and I am sure that authorities in Egypt will not cut off gas flow to Israel because of Egypt's ratification of international conventions," Miman told Gobus newspaper.

The Israeli Ministry of National Infrastructure said that Egypt supplies 43 percent of Israel's natural gas, which is mostly used for electricity production.

So, I would suspect that there are a lot of nervous imaginings in Tel-Aviv.
 
has this been a change for the good for the poor ?

If that is directed at me I'm sorry I have absolutely no idea, I think it's way too early to say anything about that. In any case that wasn't really what my post and the preceding ones were about. :)
 
Hostility to Israel is not an Islamist prerogative. It is an Arab one. Israel should indeed feel threatened by the events in Egypt (and across the middle East and North Africa) not because of the supposed "Islamist" threat but because any move to genuine self determination in the Arab world would inevitably reflect the universal hostility to Israel amongst Arabs. And for good reason. Israel represents a great injustice to their fellow Arabs.

I think we can all agree that a nervous nuclear Israel is not in anyones best interests.
 
I think we can all agree that a nervous nuclear Israel is not in anyones best interests.

An Israel that is forced to obey international law, end it's brutal 44 year occupation of Palestine and end the siege of Gaza is in everyone's interests
 
An Israel that is forced to obey international law, end it's brutal 44 year occupation of Palestine and end the siege of Gaza is in everyone's interests

Perhaps.

But do you think any of this is likely as a result of what's happening now? Your second will never happen if you mean the total removal of the state of Israel. Or do you think we're likely to see an even more aggressive stance being taken by an even more threatened nation?
 
Perhaps.

But do you think any of this is likely as a result of what's happening now? Your second will never happen if you mean the total removal of the state of Israel. Or do you think we're likely to see an even more aggressive stance being taken by an even more threatened nation?

The issue isn't the existence of Israel. The issue is the occupation. It is an open wound in the Arab world and the daily sight of Palestinians being brutalised and evicted and arrested and bombed and killed by Israeli occupation forces makes any path to normalisation with Israel impossible. It can't even begin until this crime in the Arab world comes to an end and there is a just settlement for the Palestinians. The hypocricy of Western Governments who give platitudes to democracy and human rights while turning a blind eye to the most outrageous violence of Israel is not lost on Arabs.

The issue is an end to the illegal occupation of post 67 Palestinian land, the West Bank and East Jerusalem and an end to illegal settlements and an end to the siege of Gaza. All these policies are in clear and unambiguous violation of the numerous articles of international law. No maybe's, no debates or controversies, the occupation is not "alleged" or "so called". It is illegal and has been declared illegal by every UN vote and by the rulings of every single institution of international law who have ruled on the question since 1967. The UN security council, The International court of Justice, The Red Cross, the red crescent, Amnesty, the fourth Geneva convention. The international commission of Jurists. All have ruled the occupation as illegal.

The occupation and expansion of settlements are only possible with US support, (The US only last week vetoed a UN resolution on settlements) and facilitated, until now, by the Mubarak regime.

The military, keen to continue the flow of 1.3 billion in "aid" money will want to continue this relationship. The Egyptian population, if allowed a genuine voice in determining policy, want to end it. The question then, like all questions related to the democracy movement in Egypt is the degree to which this democratic revolution truly represents the wishes of the Egyptian people.

It must be clear to Israel by now that (as Bob dylan says) the times they are a changing in the Arab world and that the party is over in terms of Israel policy being built solely on brute force. If I were an Israeli decision maker I would be pressing for an accomodation with the changing Arab world before the walls come crashing down. That means many things but absolutely number one it means a categorical guarantee to obey the demands of international law and an immediate end to the occupation. If the US is the friend of Israel that it claims they should be telling them that the writing is on the wall for the occupation. I won't hold my breath

So in answer to your question. Given Israel's seeming inabilty to see past the use of brute force, refusal to end settlement expansion and to end the occupation and given the US' seeming inabilty or unwillingness to force them to respect international law, then yes we could indeed see an increasingly aggressive stance by Israel.
 
Meanwhile:

Two indications from Egypt that Gaza blockade will collapse

The new Egyptian Foreign Minister has called the Gaza blockade a violation of int'l law, Angry Arab reports, and David Kenner translates (h/t Ali Gharib). The Foreign Minister is Nabil Elaraby, who was a judge in the historic Int'l Court of Justice Ruling against the separation wall, in 2005, and whose concurrent opinion went further than the other judges, and held that the occupation was illegal.

Meantime, Dennis Loh reports that a march from Egypt to Gaza to bring cement into the blockaded strip today succeeded in getting in the first bag of cement. From Facebook:

WE (TAHRIR TO GAZA MARCH GROUP) MADE IT. FIRST BAG OF CEMENT THROUGH RAFAH CROSSING. PALESTINIANGANDHIS.ORG SUPPORTED THIS EFFORT AND CONTINUES TO SUPPORT IT ON PURELY HUMANITARIAN GROUNDS. PLEASE HELP IF YOU ARE SO INCLINED.
 
The new Egyptian Foreign Minister has called the Gaza blockade a violation of int'l law,

I can only repeat that this is not a matter of opinion. It is an undeniable unquestionable FACT.
 
Although there have been a few moves in the right direction in the last week, there is still trouble on the ground. There have been quite a few reports now of strikes being broken in a way that involves the military arresting a few people. There has been trouble at protests too, the military sometimes getting heavy handed and then acting in a conciliatory manner afterwards 'sorry it was a mistake'. And Im pretty sure I saw word on twitter the other night that a protest had been met by the old 'armed thugs' response. And thats not even including the dramatic events at security buildings in recent days which we were talking about earlier.
 
I'm sure there's a cartoon in this headline, anyway moving on...

Hamas makes first contact with new Egyptian leadership

Gaza's Hamas rulers on Monday contacted Egypt's new leadership for the first time since a popular revolt toppled Hosni Mubarak from power last month, a statement from the Islamist group said.

Hamas leader in Gaza Ismail Haniyeh telephoned Egypt's new Prime Minister Essam Sharaf to congratulate him on his post and urged him to help lift an Israeli blockade of the coastal territory, a statement from Haniyeh's office said....
 
Gaza's Hamas rulers on Monday contacted Egypt's new leadership for the first time since a popular revolt toppled Hosni Mubarak from power last month, a statement from the Islamist group said.

Hamas leader in Gaza Ismail Haniyeh telephoned Egypt's new Prime Minister Essam Sharaf to congratulate him on his post and urged him to help lift an Israeli blockade of the coastal territory, a statement from Haniyeh's office said....

The same Hamas that refused to support the uprising and backed Mubarak.
 
Back
Top Bottom