Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Dulwich Hamlet and Coronavirus

Here's the government statement re the review of re-admitting crowds. Doesn't say much TBH. The number of pilot events has been reduced, and the maximum crowd at any one event has been reduced to 1,000.

 
If there is effectively a ban on away travel (or away getting in which amounts to the same thing), could we schedule home Women’s and Men’s fixtures on alternate Saturdays?

Think this is a cracking idea. I'd imagine Saturday afternoon attendances would bring better crowds as well. Would be a good way to support the club if, as away fans, we're not allowed to attend away games. Surely worth doing until grounds are opened up to larger grounds?
 
The National League has written to the government asking for permission to restart the first weekend in October with gates capped at 1,000 for the first month at least.
 
Last edited:
Worth noting the government instructions for much of the North West, effective as of Tuesday, apparently includes "advice" that people should not attend sports events as a spectator.

Not looking good for the request to restart with 1k fans
 
The BBC are reporting the National League won't restart on 3/10 if, as expected, the government push back the date for fans to be allowed back into stadiums at Elite level from 1/10.

The club's/league pushing for Tier Two to be classified as Elite, to permit the play offs, seems to be backfiring badly.
 
It's a good question. Presumably there might be a flight of step 2 players to step 3 in some scenarios. What a business.

Complete mess.

Just read an article from the Dover manager who said: ...[Dover] have inserted clauses in contracts this year that mean they won't pay players unless fans are watching them play..."there's players that have signed contracts but we've put in there that if the pandemic continues and football doesn't start then they are not going to get paid - other clubs have done the same too."

Sounds like some clubs at least have covered themselves.
 
In an interview with Southwark News Gav said our players will be paid from the day the season starts:

“Contracts would start when the season starts, because no one’s sure what’s going to happen with the pandemic and if there’s going to be a second wave. Obviously we don’t want that, but we have to go into this with our eyes open. So most clubs are probably covering themselves by only starting contracts when the season starts. "

 
Complete mess.

Just read an article from the Dover manager who said: ...[Dover] have inserted clauses in contracts this year that mean they won't pay players unless fans are watching them play..."there's players that have signed contracts but we've put in there that if the pandemic continues and football doesn't start then they are not going to get paid - other clubs have done the same too."

Sounds like some clubs at least have covered themselves.
Hopefully that will be the case for most, if not all, National League clubs. In that scenario I can imagine players wanting to drop levels to get some income and play some football. I'm guessing that most step 3 players are non-contract so it could be carnage.

Full of sympathy for Ben, Tom and anyone else trying to figure a way forward.
 
Oh just spotted an article with the SLP with Ben Clasper on this topic:

Dulwich Hamlet chairman Ben Clasper has expressed his frustration at the National League’s inaction – and reckons it was always clear the campaign would not start with supporters.

Cabinet minister Michael Gove confirmed on Tuesday morning that plans for fans to return to watch live sport from October 1 will not go ahead due to an increased in Covid-19 cases.

And it has been claimed the National League will not start on October 3 if supporters are not able to attend.

Clasper said: “Today’s announcement is exactly what we told them [the National League] would happen in a letter sent to them on July 31.

“We told them that we expected them to act and they haven’t acted for the last eight weeks – so that’s a frustrating point. This was about the most predictable thing that could’ve occurred, so it’s frustrating that the football authorities had a failure to acknowledge the reality we’re in.

“We’ve written on three occasions and sought confirmation [fans would be allowed] before we made any commitment and before we started talking to sponsors and fans’ consultations on season tickets. Most recently it was player contracts and that we were only able to commit to contracts on expenses on the assurance the league will start with fans. Every club should be doing this.

“Everyone talks about football clubs but they are limited companies and we have to remain solvent and a going concern. No-one should be committing to costs or self services which they can’t deliver on.”

The National League are set to hold a board meeting on Thursday.

Clasper said: “There is a non-league email chain – all the clubs are on it – and we’ve already seen teams who are quite happy to go without fans and happily incur £100,000 losses. Others it is quite simple – either everyone pays for free or we boycott the season. There will be no consensus – there will be extremes.

“The fact that league has waited to react rather than act – when we as a club wrote to them on July 31 – is on them. Now we expect them to take the right decision after six months flailing around. We’ve got government statistic and scientists agreeing this is not a one-month thing – it is a six-month problem and not a blip.

“If sport doesn’t get it’s head out of the sand and start thinking along those lines it is doomed to failure over and over again.”

Hamlet’s player contracts would have been triggered by the start of the 2020-21 season.

Clasper said: “We were happy to make those commitments and put season tickets on sale once we were categorically confident and had assurances [that fans would be allowed]. If there’s a change to that we have to revisit all commitments – both inbound and outbound.

“We were perceived as one of the pessimists because we kept talking about the long-term rather than the short term.

“We have a club which is 126 years old to protect. No-one cares about a sub-standard season if it costs us the football club. We’ve got to take a long-term view and we’ve acted in good faith financially throughout.

“With the exception of the time to pay agreement with HMRC we don’t owe anybody anybody. We’ve had an influx of cash from season tickets and was about to commit to a lot of outgoings. We always knew that there was a scenario where we’d have to mothball and go into hibernation.

“The clubs pushing [to play] have committed already and incurred significant costs. They are trying to push an agenda but it is like trying to push water up a hill. We knew we were heading for restrictions and that it was highly likely to be significant local lockdowns.

“It’s not about fans. Even if there were no fans and we were all given a pot of gold to play without them there we are still not going to finish the season. Teams are going to test positive – they are now – and games will be off where there are local lockdowns. It will take teams out of the equation for weeks. There is no perfect path to finish the season.

“The priority is to ensure the club will be here for the next 127 years and we’re not going to compromise that.”


 
In an interview with Southwark News Gav said our players will be paid from the day the season starts:

“Contracts would start when the season starts, because no one’s sure what’s going to happen with the pandemic and if there’s going to be a second wave. Obviously we don’t want that, but we have to go into this with our eyes open. So most clubs are probably covering themselves by only starting contracts when the season starts. "

And then what happens if we get an away draw against lower league opposition in the Cup on the 3rd? Season will have started. Oh lord, a tricky mess.
 
I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that this season should not be started, certainly at National League level. I think things will only get worse during the winter months and they'll be some clubs going bust mid-season and others not able to play for weeks on end because of positive Covid tests. Just too many potential problems for me. Hibernation this season and long-term survival look increasingly attractive.
 
I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that this season should not be started, certainly at National League level. I think things will only get worse during the winter months and they'll be some clubs going bust mid-season and others not able to play for weeks on end because of positive Covid tests. Just too many potential problems for me. Hibernation this season and long-term survival look increasingly attractive.
So sad at the news today that fans won’t be allowed to attend football and with no provisional date given for even re considering the decision, I think you’re probably right, hibernation might be the only option. Gutted
 
I'm slowly coming to the conclusion that this season should not be started, certainly at National League level. I think things will only get worse during the winter months and they'll be some clubs going bust mid-season and others not able to play for weeks on end because of positive Covid tests. Just too many potential problems for me. Hibernation this season and long-term survival look increasingly attractive.

I agree. I was actually quite surprised at how early some of the other clubs at our level started signing players and selling season tickets, given the levels of uncertainty.

I might be way off here but is it not the case that even if the season was to start in early October as planned, DHFC would still be buggered because of the limit on crowds? I just wonder if hibernating the season for the year would be a better scenario than attempting to stage matches, run the club and pay players on very limited income?

If it hadn't been for this week's events and the season was able to start with fans in attendance as planned, what would have been Champion Hill's maximum capacity?
 
We don't know, the permitted crowds at Elite Level had not been announced. I heard from people at a couple of other clubs it was to be calculated per ground not as a flat %. Given some obvious pinch points I suspect the current ground wouldn't have fared too well in the assessment.

Aldershot, who have much more room in the ground, had stated they anticipated being able to permit 2k once fans were admitted. They also have a few issues, toilets etc

If the season does start in front of fans (looking very unlikely now) I doubt you'll be allowed to hibernate without relegation. (It's a bit different for teams outside England, due to the potential for devolved government rules hitting them.)

To be clear, if sitting out the season and being relegated was the only way to save the club, I'd support it. I just don't think sitting the season out is an easy answer.

It's worth noting the official advice in Merseyside etc is that people now should not attend sport as a spectator. That has the potential to cause a world of pain for tier three and below in the impacted parts of England.
 
We don't know, the permitted crowds at Elite Level had not been announced. I heard from people at a couple of other clubs it was to be calculated per ground not as a flat %. Given some obvious pinch points I suspect the current ground wouldn't have fared too well in the assessment.

Aldershot, who have much more room in the ground, had stated they anticipated being able to permit 2k once fans were admitted. They also have a few issues, toilets etc

If the season does start in front of fans (looking very unlikely now) I doubt you'll be allowed to hibernate without relegation. (It's a bit different for teams outside England, due to the potential for devolved government rules hitting them.)

To be clear, if sitting out the season and being relegated was the only way to save the club, I'd support it. I just don't think sitting the season out is an easy answer.

It's worth noting the official advice in Merseyside etc is that people now should not attend sport as a spectator. That has the potential to cause a world of pain for tier three and below in the impacted parts of England.

Yes, Roger, there are no easy answers on this situation. I wasn't suggesting that we hibernate if we're able to play with reasonable crowds: only if, as looks likely, no crowds will be allowed until at least March. If that is the case, I think the most reasonable thing the National League can do is to scratch the whole season for all clubs. This would take the decision out of the hands of the clubs and ensure there's no punishment for anyone. Alternatively, in the unlikely case that things improve by January, maybe a reduced league could be played either splitting the teams from each division into two groups and playing home and away or just playing each team in the whole division once.
 
Dan Roan BBC is reporting he believes the season will start behind closed doors on October 3rd. A statement is due shortly

If true, either they know some money is coming fron the government or the weighted voting system has led to a whole world of pain for many clubs in the North and South divisions
 
Last edited:
Dan Roan BBC is reporting he believes the season will start behind closed doors on October 3rd. A statement is due shortly

If true, either they know some money is coming fron the government or the weighted voting system has led to a whole world of pain for many clubs in the North and South divisions
The latter would be appalling. Guess we'll find out soon.
 
It looks like no go until they source funding but this statement is a shocker.

Edited to say some sources say this means the season is starting irrespective. Others that it starts if they get the money. The statement doesn't really cover that point off bizarrely.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom