Getting back to dowsing...
Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that civil engineers have had and still have no problem with it as a preliminary marker...and have explained it as similar to the gold spectrometer test. I bet people thought that static electricity was woo woo until it was fully understood too.
"The divining rod is performing a similar function to the gold leaf electroscope used during school physics to demonstrate electrostatic effects. The charges on the rods cause a response in relation to the charges on the object. Like charges repel and opposite charges attract to influence the alignment that the rods are trying to take up. It was noted that if the dowser removed his or her shoes, their sensitivity often increased, indicating the importance of electrical continuity with the ground."
Again...from The New Civil Engineer publication.
Locating underground features by dowsing
And have a read of his too..
In defence of dowsing to detect water | Letters
The Munich experiment was a failure for the dowserd ...bar one who had remarkable success rate.
Even the researchers stated this..
"Some few dowsers, in particular tasks, showed an extraordinarily high rate of success, which can scarcely if at all be explained as due to chance ... a real core of dowser-phenomena can be regarded as empirically proven ... (5)"
And most dowserd did not do particularly well in the experiment. However one did better than odds.
View attachment 132226
The researchers and dowserd couldn't explain failures. But it was not a natural setting and this may have impacted on the test. There was no rock, soil or ground. The test was carried out in the ground floor of a barn...and dowsers were tested one the first floor... just air between the two levels.
As such, the setting was not a good replica of a natural setting....which is ordinarily out of doors...involves moving over earth, stone, metals, minerals and water and other materials that may carry an electric charge.
Many things we accept and understand and use in modern life were at one stage not understood or recognised and indeed were thought to have been woo woo.
Dowsing is something that is not completely worked out but just because it's not fully understood does not mean it is rubbish or doesn't work.
Slightly off topic ... but the use of bed sting venom is only
now being used in western medicine for arthritis and inflammatory conditions.....
Bee stings have long been known to help with arthritis. I mentioned earlier in the thread that my grandad kept bees and that people with arthristis used to visit just for the bee stings....to help relieve pain..
I'm going to just leave this now because believe it or not I do respect science and I am very interested in theoretical physics but I am not someone who dismisses something that has a huge amount of anecdotal success because of one failed test.
It just shows that the test did not replicate natural conditions. What is needed is a Full test to be carried out in natural conditions (outdoors with groundwater) ...
I know quite a few civil engineers and architects and none of them would dismiss dowsing because they have experienced it working....successfully.
It's not woo woo or magic...it is described as similar to the gold spectronomer test. ...
Although....
It would be interesting to see a robot carry the rods over an area ...to see if the rods move.