Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

[existentialist]

Sure. I was more thinking of how do they feel about his offering a porn star thousands of dollars to spend the night with him.

Oh, well, I expect that will be all lies. And, anyway, sex workers don't count.

 

[DotCommunist]

well since trump admits to 'moving on it like a bitch' with married women we turn as always to the wisdom of Deuteronomy 22:22
'If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. You must purge the evil from Israel.'

 

[8den]

WikiLeaks release excludes evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia

Like I said theres not going to be a single smoking gun connecting Russia to Wikileaks just a steady drip drip of slowly building compelling evidence,

 

[frogwoman]

Evan McMullin: the 'unknown Mormon' who could take Utah from Trump and Clinton



Someone said on facebook that it wouldnt surprise them if a third party candidate got into office

 

[Casually Red]

Its late and I'm getting my clinton conspiracy theories mixed up. Is there anyone who's been remotely connected to Bill and Hilary who's death isn't considered part of the grand conspiracy theory?

Took almost a full hour to come up with that . After mentally wrestling with a series of implausible excuses

Being connected to the Clintons is much like being the drummer in Spinal Tap . That's if they don't rape or sexually assault you . Much worse if you just happen to be a resident of a country that's in their cross hairs .

 

[crossthebreeze]

Evan McMullin: the 'unknown Mormon' who could take Utah from Trump and Clinton



Someone said on facebook that it wouldn't surprise them if a third party candidate got into office

I was puzzled by that initially, but i think the theory is that if neither Trump or Clinton get 270 electoral college votes, it goes to the Congress to decide the presidency. The Congress has a republican majority, so would be less likely to endorse Clinton unless she had clearly more electoral college vote and percentage of vote share. However if one or more candidates other than Trump or Clinton have got electoral college votes, even if they have only taken 1 state, than the third candidate with the biggest number of electoral college votes would also have to be included in the Congress vote. In normal circumstances they would have no chance of winning, but if they are a candidate that appeals to establishment republicans, and if Trump has pissed off enough republicans in congress, then that third party candidate could in theory get enough votes in congress to be elected as President! It seems to be a idea coming from conservative anti-trump republicans.

 

[Casually Red]

I think many manage to square the circle by resorting to Biblical attitudes towards women - a fairly constant thread in Trump's (and many right wingers') narratives is the idea that, when a bad thing happens to a woman, it's her fault.

Or maybe they just think to themselves she's lucky it wasn't Bill Clinton .

 

[Casually Red]

Oh, well, I expect that will be all lies. And, anyway, sex workers don't count.

The well worn, tried and trusted Clinton defence ??

A " bimbo eruption " is what Killary calls it iirc .

 

[bimble]

Or maybe they just think to themselves she's lucky it wasn't Bill Clinton .

This whole pathetic thing of pointing at the clintons and shouting accusations about sexual assault, instead of explaining what's wrong with her policies and why trumps are better, it really weakens your position, makes you look like a proper typical trumper.

 

[Casually Red]

Oh dear. It must be getting really uncomfortable for some devout Christians to remain steadfast and vote for Trump.

Probably no more uncomfortable than feminists feel when voting for the Clintons .

 

[Casually Red]

This whole pathetic thing of pointing at the clintons and shouting accusations about sexual assault, instead of explaining what's wrong with her policies and why trumps are better, it really weakens your position, makes you look like a proper typical trumper.

Umm..I don't think Trumps policies are better . I don't have much of a clue what they actually are . And I suspect neither does he . I've no idea were you got that from .

Your argument here seems to be its fine to make these accusations against Trump but not the Clintons . That's pretty mind boggling . And hypocritical frankly . Comparing like with like is perfectly fine in my book Particularly when the Clinton campaign are making these accusations central to their appeal...albeit with Killary ducking for cover and staying well in the background for obvious reasons . Although so far Trump still has a bit to go before he equals Bill Clinton in the accusation stakes .

 

[bimble]

Umm..I don't think Trumps policies are better . I don't have much of a clue what they actually are . And I suspect neither does he . I've no idea were you got that from .

Oh. I got that idea from your saying that you'd vote for him.

 

[DotCommunist]

will the mormon make polygamy legal in all states one wonders

 

[frogwoman]

My dad, who on paper would be a typical Trump voter (white, middle aged, lower middle class, hasn't worked for ages) and supported him in the Republican primary (from a distance obviously) is now terrified now he looks in striking distance of the white house he now thinks he's a 'dangerous nutter' lol

Wonder how many deplorables are having second thoughts...

 

[existentialist]

The well worn, tried and trusted Clinton defence ??

A " bimbo eruption " is what Killary calls it iirc .

I'm not aware that I mentioned, alluded to, or was even thinking about Clinton when I wrote that post. I fear that you may have become a little over-focused on your goal.

 

[Casually Red]

Oh. I got that idea from your saying that you'd vote for him.

I explained why in detail , more than once . I'd thought the absence of any clear trump policies figured pretty highly in my preference to him over Clintons very predictable neo liberal, globalisation and war mongering agenda .

 

[Casually Red]

I'm not aware that I mentioned, alluded to, or was even thinking about Clinton when I wrote that post. I fear that you may have become a little over-focused on your goal.

In a debate over the US presidential election you never thought mentioning the other candidate would feature when slagging off that one . For something very similar .

Oh well .

Just out of interest have you ever heard a phrase that involves a pot, a kettle and a word that rhymes with nuclear attack ?

 

[Lord Camomile]

My dad, who on paper would be a typical Trump voter (white, middle aged, lower middle class, hasn't worked for ages) and supported him in the Republican primary (from a distance obviously) is now terrified now he looks in striking distance of the white house he now thinks he's a 'dangerous nutter' lol

I was thinking the other day about the rumoured 'accidental Brexiteers' who voted Leave as a 'protest vote', thinking that it would never actually happen.

I wonder if the primaries are an inadvertent guard against that - they can vote for him in the primary, scaring the shite out of the establishment or whatever it is they want to do, but then not pull the trigger for the actual election.

Clinging to any hope these days, however desperate...

 

[frogwoman]

I was thinking the other day about the rumoured 'accidental Brexiteers' who voted Leave as a 'protest vote', thinking that it would never actually happen.

I wonder if the primaries are an inadvertent guard against that - they can vote for him in the primary, scaring the shite out of the establishment or whatever it is they want to do, but then not pull the trigger for the actual election.

Clinging to any hope these days, however desperate...

My housemate told me he had never voted before and voted to leave after literally flipping a coin in the polling booth plenty must have voted remain on that basis too tbf

 

[existentialist]

In a debate over the US presidential election you never thought mentioning the other candidate would feature when slagging off that one . For something very similar .

Oh well .

Just out of interest have you ever heard a phrase that involves a pot, a kettle and a word that rhymes with nuclear attack ?

You really do have a very black-and-white viewpoint, don't you? From the playground name-mangling to the automatic assumption that anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what you're saying, what you demonstrate is a naivety of quite breathtaking proportions.

I haven't bothered too much with trying to solve your riddle, on the assumption that it will somehow involve Hillary Clinton, and would therefore be boring.

 

[8den]

Being connected to the Clintons is much like being the drummer in Spinal Tap . That's if they don't rape or sexually assault you . .

And yet the number of Clinton appointees alive and well is numerous, and she's 12 points up in some polls. It's almost if the universe rejects your claims.

 

[existentialist]

And yet the number of Clinton appointees alive and well is numerous, and she's 12 points up in some polls. It's almost if the universe rejects your claims.

*gasp*

 

[bimble]

My dad, who on paper would be a typical Trump voter (white, middle aged, lower middle class, hasn't worked for ages) and supported him in the Republican primary (from a distance obviously) is now terrified now he looks in striking distance of the white house he now thinks he's a 'dangerous nutter' lol

Wonder how many deplorables are having second thoughts...

Your Dad sounds alright.
Finally got round to calling my nutty old auntie in Florida.
She said that she probably won't vote at all, because can't stomach ticking the Trump box after recent weeks but nor can she bring herself to vote for 'that crooked woman'.

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

Your argument here seems to be its fine to make these accusations against Trump but not the Clintons ..

Because.... only one of the Clintons is running for President?

Because saying ' don't get mad at me: he's just as bad!' is the moral reasoning of a six-year-old?

 

[Johnny Canuck3]

WikiLeaks release excludes evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia

Like I said theres not going to be a single smoking gun connecting Russia to Wikileaks just a steady drip drip of slowly building compelling evidence,

Interesting article.

 

[petee]

ah, the rothschilds, winkwink

e2a, about curt schilling

 

[J Ed]

Axelrod: I don't know a strategist on either side who privately thinks Trump will win

Democratic strategist David Axelrod on Sunday said Hillary Clinton is in a "very strong position" to win the presidential race.

"I don't know any consultant on either side, any strategist, who privately believes that Donald Trump is going to win this election," Axelrod, chief strategist for President Obama's 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

Axelrod said the fact that Clinton, the Democratic nominee, is going into normally red states shows she is in a strong position.

He said Clinton is doing well in "virtually every" traditional battleground state.

Axelrod also said the Clinton campaign is able to conduct analyses based on early voters because it has invested in the "accouterments of modern politics."

"Through those techniques, you can really get a sense of how you are doing," he said.

"And they know who hasn't voted who should be voting for them, and they'll be pressing those people. There's no comparable operation in the Trump campaign."

In the RealClearPolitics average of polls, Clinton has a 5.9-point lead over her Republican rival, 45.3 percent to 39.4 percent. She is leading in many battleground polls and has appeared to be trying to expand the electoral map.

According to the polls-plus forecast on FiveThirtyEight, Clinton is predicted to get 330.4 electoral votes, a significant lead over Trump's 206.8 electoral votes.

Axelrod on Sunday also criticized Trump's campaign, saying the GOP nominee has made himself the issue and "center of discussion."

"So even though she's going into this election with historically high liabilities," he said, "in comparison to Donald Trump, she's doing quite well."

 

[squirrelp]

WikiLeaks release excludes evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia

Like I said theres not going to be a single smoking gun connecting Russia to Wikileaks just a steady drip drip of slowly building compelling evidence,

What is this court case? I can't find a mainstream source covering this story which isn't anything than a copy of the dailydot article, which respectfully is a website I know nothing about

 

[MikeMcc]

Because.... only one of the Clintons is running for President?

Because saying ' don't get mad at me: he's just as bad!' is the moral reasoning of a six-year-old?

Unfortunately it appears that she colluded to trash those that Bill was involved with. That's pretty bad for someone that fronts herself in looking after female rights.

That does not excuse Trump though. The guy is an out-and-out misogynist.

 

[8den]

What is this court case? I can't find a mainstream source covering this story which isn't anything than a copy of the dailydot article, which respectfully is a website I know nothing about

The Daily Dot - Wikipedia

Just because your links are all conspiracy theorist nonsense doesn't mean everyone's else is.