i just don't understand - WHY is labour better??? i actually hate new labour almost as much as the tories.
i just don't understand - WHY is labour better??? i actually hate new labour almost as much as the tories.
I dislike all three too. They will all pursue neo-liberal economics and will all make the poor pay for their crisis. Very little divergence between the three.
Nonetheless, within that very narrow spectrum Labour still come out the best for the majority. The new Tory/Whig government will look to slash immediately and with little thought for the impact on working class communities, whereas Labour whilst still intending to slash were proposing stalling the cuts to lessen the immediate burden and in the hope that the private sector would pick up and be able to relieve the unemployment burden when the public sector job losses accelerate.
The wing of the Liberals that is dominant at the moment is essentially the Thatcherite wing, combined with the Tories and with a massive fuck-off deficit that they intend to pay back through cuts rather than increases in progressive tax spells bad news for the vast majority.
but labour didn't want to try form a coalition with the lib dems it transpired... perhaps if labour or the lib dems had taken a few more votes off the tories that would have been a possibility, but sadly it wasn't. the lib dems, at the very least, were going to have to vote through the budget...
The LibDems needn't have even voted them through the Queen's Speech.
what would have happened then? a new general election?
but labour didn't want to try form a coalition with the lib dems it transpired... perhaps if labour or the lib dems had taken a few more votes off the tories that would have been a possibility, but sadly it wasn't. the lib dems, at the very least, were going to have to vote through the budget...
hello big tory majorityYes.
hello big tory majority
Where are they now?
Dunno, the Liberals are saying that but Labour are saying the Liberals only opened up discussions to put the pressure on Cameron. Inclined to believe the latter because Clegg is far closer to the Tories than Labour and because the Liberals clearly saw going in with Labour as riskier than the Tories.
Proud of yourself?
Yes - I stopped a potentially religious nutter A-List candidate from doing their thing in my local area and kept it Lib Dem and also got a slightly toned down Tory Government running the country. Best result out of a bad set of circumstances - whether it will work or not is another matter.
this is not a toned down tory government. it's a 100% tory government.
I have to also bear in mind that if I am serious about favouring PR, it will become the norm for no party to have overall control. This will necessitate different parties working together. So it'd be pretty hypocritical to be totally against the idea now.
I have to also bear in mind that if I am serious about favouring PR, it will become the norm for no party to have overall control. This will necessitate different parties working together. So it'd be pretty hypocritical to be totally against the idea now.
What, it doesn't matter who the parties are as long as they work together? A curiously unpolitical postion.
More that I recognise that 33%+ of the voters disagree with me. Am I to insist that their views are completely disregarded? Whilst this has a certain appeal, it doesn't fit well with my general life philosophy.
Why have elections at all then?
To keep the Tories out?So yes, I voted Liberal Democrat. And yes, I would do so again tomorrow.
It didn't work because not enough other people also voted against the Tories. Such as yourself, for example.To keep the Tories out?
Oops.
No, just names.I don't think he'd accept an apology.
If each party had won 200 seats, do you think that the Lib Dems would still have formed a coalition with the Tories and put Cameron in Number 10?