UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
gone are the days of finding a wank mag over the fields and getting all excited .... the kids have it too easy these days... !!!!
We traded images on floppy disks
gone are the days of finding a wank mag over the fields and getting all excited .... the kids have it too easy these days... !!!!
Not if you consider opting in as being equally difficult for non technical people. Why should they have their internet censored because other people want their internet censored?yeah, it was probably me, I mentioned that we use open DNS. It means we, the parents, can't look at pron either, but that's fine, not interested, seen it all (well, not all, but enough to satisfy my curiosity) The thing with opting out, as I mentioned, what if parents aren't computer literate? I think people call for opt in because that just seems safer.
"Excuse me sir would you like to opt in for the perv package?"
How would you sell it?
It's easier to market the opt out and ultimately make the controls more effective.
re dns level filtering, smart kids will just add entries to the hosts file...
or run the following in a batch file
netsh interface ip set dns name="Local Area Connection" <IP address of dns server>
Probably because they monitor internet use. U75 is the most viewed site in my company. Luckily, I'm the one that checks the weblogs
I'd be fucked if they knew how much time I waste on here
These all require admin/root don't they? So how would they do that?re dns level filtering, smart kids will just add entries to the hosts file...
or run the following
netsh interface ip set dns name="Local Area Connection" <IP address of dns server>
These all require admin/root don't they? So how would they do that?
DNS filtering should go on the router too, not the computer.
Not without admin/root access you can't.you can still tell the PC to use staticluy assigned dns, ip etc which would bypass the dns servers assigned via dhcp.
or they could just go to one of the many website where you can do a nslookup and obtain the ip address of the site that way which bypasses dns completely
"Excuse me sir would you like to opt in for the perv package?"
How would you sell it?
It's easier to market the opt out and ultimately make the controls more effective.
Yeah, it's a continual fight (maybe the wrong word)...
I installed Qustodio and it gave me herpes.Well, per se, I am not against necessary and sensible filtering. Kids should definitely be monitored and harmful content filtered. For those who say that kids also need privacy, there is the case of the unfortunate Amanda Todd. I watch who my son is talking to on Facebook using a free app called Qustodio that allows me to view the profile pictures of accounts that he engages with. Such monitoring is for their own good. Qustodio is a nice app. Just Google for it.
ipsos custodes
GiffGaff already have this, people have to opt in (not saying their filtering is any good but it's a start, they are getting lots of complaints the other way, from people who trying to opt in but still being restricted)
On their 'phone settings' page there's an option to
Allow Adult Content on Phone
The default is NOT to allow adult content on the phone.
Not without admin/root access you can't.
You can also block the nslookup websites. Many websites do not work with just IP either.
Yeah, it's a continual fight (maybe the wrong word) but it's actually pretty easy to block all but the most determined. Which is entirely the point and why it's actually worth doing rather than just not bothering and assuming that all children are l33t h@x0rz.
arms race, that's what it feels like , like I said in an earlier post
no it didn't .xxx is only a relatively new thing (sunrise started on 7 September 2011) and is being prompted (forcibly eviction in some cases) by fundamentalist Christian groups (principally the wonderfully sexist Concern Group for Women) in the states who are also pushing for the entire TLD to then be filtered at a national level... Which interestingly is precisely what India has done since the TDL came into use.If they had thought of the .xxx domain when the web first began, and really encouraged a culture that respected the idea of putting adult content on sites with domains ending in it, then this sort of thing would at least be vaguely feasible. It would still ahve been relatively trivial to circumvent but at least there would be less chance of youngsters stumbling on stuff without actually wanting to. Having heard some anecdotes at my former place of employment, it does sound like there may be some boys of a certain age who are just looking for some very soft stuff and end up with far more than they bargained for.
freind of mines kids got their school to install firefox on their machines for 'security reasons' but really it was cos one of them had a tool bar which turned their facebook/bebo in to an excell type spread sheet so it looked like they were working but were really browsing away...
yep and the little bastards get sneakier and sneakier with every passing IT lesson in school...
Bollocksof course you can.
for example
urban75.net is 178.250.73.49 (according to http://centralops.net/co/) or they could get the ip address from any of their friends with lless savvy mums/dads
assuming multiple headers are not an issue you can then put this directly into a web browser and bypass any dns completly.
yes for host file editing and ip settings you would need admin rights but given physical access to a machine rights escalation isnt that hard to achieve.
i agree though that your average 5 year old may struggle to do this.. your average 13 year old however is a comppletly differnet bowl of molluscs
Bollocks