Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Culturist Conference 2013

People have been resentful of foreigners for millenia. That's just the way most societies work.

I don't think we'd have had half the problems with racism if numbers had been controlled a little better. Obviously you are always going to have the extremists.

What I also find rather disturbing is that, once again, the EU and the UN are trying to force a multicultural society to happen.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

If it was organic over a period of time, there wouldn't be the kinds of resentment we now see in Europe.
 
I don't think we'd have had half the problems with racism if numbers had been controlled a little better. Obviously you are always going to have the extremists.

What I also find rather disturbing is that, once again, the EU and the UN are trying to force a multicultural society to happen.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

If it was organic over a period of time, there wouldn't be the kinds of resentment we now see in Europe.
Yes, we'd have good old fashioned pogroms instead.
 
I don't think we'd have had half the problems with racism if numbers had been controlled a little better. Obviously you are always going to have the extremists.

What I also find rather disturbing is that, once again, the EU and the UN are trying to force a multicultural society to happen.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395

If it was organic over a period of time, there wouldn't be the kinds of resentment we now see in Europe.
Are you going to attempt to answer any of my questions? Shall we do the one about the jewish plans for globalisation first?
 
Idris2002 will surely chop your legs off for that.

Yeah, like I need a reason.

There was definitely a shared "British" identity for a long time, one that evolved over course of time (and only did so slowly after the union of England and Scotland in 1707). It had both elite and popular elements, however, and I really need to get some work done today, and the dentist's local anaesthetic is wearing off, so I no longer have an excuse for skiving. . .
 
What does this confused mess mean Earendel? You don't believes that jews literally secretly run the world but you do believe that some jews support Israel? Ok, stunning observation - what's it got to do with running the world (or nor) though? Then you continue on to say that jews have a desire to stop the right as the right will effect the jewish plans for globalisation. Which is rather close to saying that jews do have a secret plan for running the world isn't it? What are these jewish plans for globalisation? Where did you hear about them and from who? Of what does their jewish nature consist?

Sorry Butchersapron, I didn't see this one.

First off, you can't say Jews are trying to do anything, its a bit of a generalisation otherwise, but many of those in the globalist positions are Jewish or obviously support Zionism. Since a lot of these companies also hold sway over UN policies through smaller organisations such as the WTO, (and Bilderberg) its not exactly rocket science to assume that they do hold a lot of power internationally because of the fact that collectively they own most banking firms and the media organisations. Its not a conspiracy theory, its common sense.
 
fucking hell binxie how much bullshit can you pack into one paragraph? It's the density that impresses me really more than anything else.
 
Sorry Butchersapron, I didn't see this one.

First off, you can't say Jews are trying to do anything, its a bit of a generalisation otherwise, but many of those in the globalist positions are Jewish or obviously support Zionism. Since a lot of these companies also hold sway over UN policies through smaller organisations such as the WTO, (and Bilderberg) its not exactly rocket science to assume that they do hold a lot of power internationally because of the fact that collectively they own most banking firms and the media organisations. Its not a conspiracy theory, its common sense.

Well, it's not Ern, anyway, as even he wouldn't stoop to this level. Does anyone know what became of Ern, by the way?
 
fucking hell binxie how much bullshit can you pack into one paragraph? It's the density that impresses me really more than anything else.

Yet I'm still waiting for you to say anything constructive on anything. Oh, except how fighting intolerance with intolerance is the way to go...
 
so let me get this right.

there is no British culture.

there are groups within Britain that have their own cultures.

and you want to claim them all as British, presumably whether they like this or not.

and you don't know the difference between a national minority and an ethnic minority.

All a bit contradictory, isn't it? Most of the things mentioned aren't "pan-British", they're Celtic, and not even quite pan-Celtic either.
 
I think sometimes going back to the first post by this person (when s/he said something about when people say japanese culture of whatever) that we sometimes use national definings of cultures as shorthands but these things always fall apart when put under closer examination. I think most people are aware that we are just using shorthands when we say that kinda thing?

Japanese culture is also arguable not a good comparator, as Japanese culture has at least partially evolved through a process of ethnic cleansing of the indigenous Ainu from the Islands, and from the centuries-long practice of xenophobia.
 
lol, Says the anti-fascist who supports violence against political opposition. Nice fascist streak, meight.

:facepalm:

Violence per se isn't fascistic. Kicking the shit out of neo-Nazis who are causing trouble in your locale is just basic community-mindedness, if you haven't invited the neo-Nazis there.
Use of violence in pursuit of authoritarian ends, rather than the violence being a means and end in and of itself, could be considered fascistic, though.
 
Violence per se isn't fascistic. Kicking the shit out of neo-Nazis who are causing trouble in your locale is just basic community-mindedness, if you haven't invited the neo-Nazis there.
Use of violence in pursuit of authoritarian ends, rather than the violence being a means and end in and of itself, could be considered fascistic, though.

Except UKIP recently got attacked and are not a Nazi party...

So that is authoritarian surely because it effects the democratic process.
 
Back
Top Bottom