Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Crown and Anchor pub, Brixton Road, Brixton goes card-only

I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.

Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.

Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona

And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"
Did I post up the links saying," Here. These articles are perfectly aligned to my viewpoint"? Why no, I did not.
 
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.

Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.

Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona

And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"

I think retailers should be law be obliged to accept cash payments. I pay for a lot of goods on the nail with cash. My fridge from Currys from example. I don't want that taken away from me.
 
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.

Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.

Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona

And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"

Are you saying you would support a move to abolish cash and replace it with government backed E currency?

Im not clear if you have actually said yes or no.
 
This thread is starting to get to be full of links. Which I'm not keen on.

Ploughed through few a few. Teuchters link had this:

This is possible in Sweden because even though cash is a legal tender, contract laws have a higher precedence than banking and payment laws here. If a store puts up a sign that it does not accept cash, then you, as a customer, have entered a contract or an agreement with that store that they don’t accept cash. But in other countries, like Denmark for instance, payment laws have higher precedence than contract laws. In those countries, if something is a legal tender, then according to the law a store must accept it. This is one of the key reasons why Sweden is more cashless than other countries — because of its legal framework.

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/going-cashless-can-learn-swedens-experience/

This shows that the State has role in pushing towards cashless society.

Another thing that this article states is that Swedes:

. Swedes adopt new technologies rapidly and are very open to accepting changes in the payment systems. One key reason for this is that we have a very good relationship with our government. Unlike most other countries, we trust our government and we trust our banks. This is quite unique to Sweden.

I don't think that is the case in this country. Trust is an issue here.

The researcher they interviewed was asked about pros and cons. What he says does not make me support move to cashless society:

From a research perspective, I don’t really have an opinion whether this is good or bad. This is the path that Sweden and other countries are heading towards and there is nothing we can do to revert the course. It will have different consequences; some are positive, some are negative. An advantage of a cashless society is that it will be easier to trace criminal activities and we might be able to block some of them. The disadvantage is that everyone can be traced. We will be more traced than we are today. We will lose our privacy
 
Last edited:
I see you have no sympathy for the downtrodden, card-less masses of Stockwell that are being excluded :mad:
To be fair, they're very accommodating to their regulars. This isn't the place to elaborate but they do make sure the local community are well served.
 
Presumably post Brexit we can switch back to pounds shillings and pence!

I voted remain and if we leave I'll be demanding it return of LSD just to see those stupid people trying to manage counting in twelves and scores.
We'll need to devalue the pound so I think one pound to one new old penny should be about right and we can have farthings again.
 

New York City’s council has voted to ban cashless businesses, in what politicians said was an effort to rein in “the excesses of the digital economy” and stop discrimination against low-income residents.

The city council on Thursday almost unanimously passed legislation, which will fine retail outlets, including stores and restaurants, if they refuse to accept cash payment.

Supporters of the ban argue that electronic-only payments discriminate against low-income people, undocumented immigrants and people of color, who are less likely to have a bank account or access to credit.

Good to see that the elected representatives of the people of New York see making sure cash is accepted is important.
 
I have no idea how many folks in the States have no bank accounts but Amen to that.

The article says:

by New York City’s department of consumer and worker protection found that 11% of households in the city have no bank account, while about 22% of households are “underbanked” – meaning they use alternatives to bank accounts for some payments
.

They recognise that some people have bank account but dont want to use it for all payments.
 
Here's one take on not going cash-free

Why should we pay cash everywhere with banknotes instead of a card ?

- I have a £50 banknote in my pocket. Going to a restaurant and paying for dinner with it. The restaurant owner then uses the note to pay for the laundry. The laundry owner then uses the note to pay the barber. The barber will then use the note for shopping. After an unlimited number of payments, it will still remain a £50, which has fulfilled its purpose to everyone who used it for payment and the bank has jumped dry from every cash payment transaction made..

- But if I come to a restaurant and pay for digitally - Card, bank fees for my payment transaction charged to the seller are 3%, so around £1.50 and so will the fee £1.50 for each further payment transaction or owner re laundry or payments of the owner of the laundry shop, or payments of the barber etc..... Therefore, after 30 transactions, the initial £50 will remain only £5 and the remaining £45 became the property of the bank thanks to all digital transactions and fees.
 
Here's one take on not going cash-free
It's a daft one there is no virtual equivalent of the £50 note whose value is reduced by multiple transactions, each transaction is unique and has no relationship to any other.
 
Hootannany is now card only, even the pool tables are activated with a debit card. I can see how this will actually help on busy nights to speed up the service, I suppose.

I overheard people talking in the Marquis of Lorne yesterday how much business they must loose from pissed people coming out of the academy who want a drink after the gig, since its cash only and the nearest cash point is a 10 minute trundle back the way they came into Brixton. The fact is most people under about 40 don't really carry cash about these days, apart from to buy drugs.
 
Here's the far bigger problem than some pissed up blokes not being able to get a beer at Brixton's only cash-only bar:



When you pay digitally, you always leave a digital footprint, and this footprint is easily monitored by financial institutions. Understandably, consumers are uneasy about their data being harvested or tracked by big businesses.

Many people also feel that cashless spending is more difficult to control. It’s simply too easy to overspend when you’re not looking at a finite, physical sum of money in your wallet or purse, so careful budgeting becomes important.

Beyond individual consumers, the cashless society could also prove costly for small businesses.

Most credit card and mobile payments attract a up to three per cent processing charge, which will quickly eat into small profit margins, making it hard for independent shops and small-scale specialist outlets.

In an unpredictable world, there is always a concern about system vulnerability. How resilient is the technology that supports a cashless society?


And a US perspective which raises valid points:

 
Here's the far bigger problem than some pissed up blokes not being able to get a beer at Brixton's only cash-only bar:






And a US perspective which raises valid points:

Don't all pensioners have bank accounts these days?
I have been on pension since July 2020, but in practice I went cashless when the Covid lockdown started.
The only inconvenience I have about this is on the rare occasion I attend local churches - who don't seem to have moved with the times.
Due to inflation collections seem to be notes only these days - even in the C of E!

Maybe there is more of an argument for cash when it comes to addictive behaviour?
I mean it;s possible a hard-core drinker can be restrained by having run out of cash in their pocket where a credit card would prove a disaster.
Likewise betting machines.
 
Here's the far bigger problem than some pissed up blokes not being able to get a beer at Brixton's only cash-only bar:






And a US perspective which raises valid points:


grosvenor is card only as well, and i have overspent in there a couple of times as a result
heres another perspective from a pub in swindon...not a publican so cant verify if this is true..


3CC39423-F40B-4DBA-9B31-4E7249C24AB9.jpeg
 
grosvenor is card only as well, and i have overspent in there a couple of times as a result
heres another perspective from a pub in swindon...not a publican so cant verify if this is true..


View attachment 352743
I think this notice is untrue (unless possibly the pub is a "community pub and registered charity" - and their bank offers special cheap deals to charities)
Bank charges to businesses were always very particular in accounting for BOTH cash in and cash out.
Or is the Carpenter's Arms with some poncy bank like Metro, itself teetering on the brink to retain customers?
 
I think this notice is untrue (unless possibly the pub is a "community pub and registered charity" - and their bank offers special cheap deals to charities)
Bank charges to businesses were always very particular in accounting for BOTH cash in and cash out.
Or is the Carpenter's Arms with some poncy bank like Metro, itself teetering on the brink to retain customers?
Another pub has said exactly the same thing

 
Back
Top Bottom