Did I post up the links saying," Here. These articles are perfectly aligned to my viewpoint"? Why no, I did not.I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.
Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.
Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona
And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.
Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.
Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona
And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused - the article doesn't agree with your view point - it doesn't propose the end of electronic currencies, nor that retailers shouldn't be e-currency only, nor cash being a compulsory method of payment in Sweden - as it points out that retailers aren't obliged to accept cash by law anyway.
Instead, it says that the state bank should deliver an online currency instead of the private banking sector.
Here's the state bank Riksbank policy and research paper summary on implementing a a state run e-krona until the point at which those using cash dwindle:
Next step – a technical solution for the e-krona
And from it's press release in 2016: "The Riksbank will continue issuing banknotes and coins as long as there is demand for them in society. It is our statutory duty and we will of course continue to live up to it"
This is possible in Sweden because even though cash is a legal tender, contract laws have a higher precedence than banking and payment laws here. If a store puts up a sign that it does not accept cash, then you, as a customer, have entered a contract or an agreement with that store that they don’t accept cash. But in other countries, like Denmark for instance, payment laws have higher precedence than contract laws. In those countries, if something is a legal tender, then according to the law a store must accept it. This is one of the key reasons why Sweden is more cashless than other countries — because of its legal framework.
. Swedes adopt new technologies rapidly and are very open to accepting changes in the payment systems. One key reason for this is that we have a very good relationship with our government. Unlike most other countries, we trust our government and we trust our banks. This is quite unique to Sweden.
From a research perspective, I don’t really have an opinion whether this is good or bad. This is the path that Sweden and other countries are heading towards and there is nothing we can do to revert the course. It will have different consequences; some are positive, some are negative. An advantage of a cashless society is that it will be easier to trace criminal activities and we might be able to block some of them. The disadvantage is that everyone can be traced. We will be more traced than we are today. We will lose our privacy
Presumably post Brexit we can switch back to pounds shillings and pence!I miss farthings with that nice Wren on them.
What kind of clientele do they serve?Cavendish Arms Stockwell - Card only!
I see you have no sympathy for the downtrodden, card-less masses of Stockwell that are being excludedIt's an open mike comedy night with a very diverse crowd - a good night
It's an open mike comedy night with a very diverse crowd - a good night
To be fair, they're very accommodating to their regulars. This isn't the place to elaborate but they do make sure the local community are well served.I see you have no sympathy for the downtrodden, card-less masses of Stockwell that are being excluded
noticed a few places now only accepting card. All food and drink/bars, although mostly in areas like Soho.
I was in a cafe in Peckham the other day....card only...in a cafe....(it was a bit of a posh cafe place, but all the same...)
That's nice to hearTo be fair, they're very accommodating to their regulars. This isn't the place to elaborate but they do make sure the local community are well served.
Presumably post Brexit we can switch back to pounds shillings and pence!
New York City’s council has voted to ban cashless businesses, in what politicians said was an effort to rein in “the excesses of the digital economy” and stop discrimination against low-income residents.
The city council on Thursday almost unanimously passed legislation, which will fine retail outlets, including stores and restaurants, if they refuse to accept cash payment.
Supporters of the ban argue that electronic-only payments discriminate against low-income people, undocumented immigrants and people of color, who are less likely to have a bank account or access to credit.
Good to see that the elected representatives of the people of New York see making sure cash is accepted is important.New York City votes to ban cashless businesses in step against discrimination
Supporters of the ban argue electronic-only payments discriminate against people who don’t have a bank account or access to creditwww.theguardian.com
I have no idea how many folks in the States have no bank accounts but Amen to that.
2019 report
.by New York City’s department of consumer and worker protection found that 11% of households in the city have no bank account, while about 22% of households are “underbanked” – meaning they use alternatives to bank accounts for some payments
Why should we pay cash everywhere with banknotes instead of a card ?
- I have a £50 banknote in my pocket. Going to a restaurant and paying for dinner with it. The restaurant owner then uses the note to pay for the laundry. The laundry owner then uses the note to pay the barber. The barber will then use the note for shopping. After an unlimited number of payments, it will still remain a £50, which has fulfilled its purpose to everyone who used it for payment and the bank has jumped dry from every cash payment transaction made..
- But if I come to a restaurant and pay for digitally - Card, bank fees for my payment transaction charged to the seller are 3%, so around £1.50 and so will the fee £1.50 for each further payment transaction or owner re laundry or payments of the owner of the laundry shop, or payments of the barber etc..... Therefore, after 30 transactions, the initial £50 will remain only £5 and the remaining £45 became the property of the bank thanks to all digital transactions and fees.
It's a daft one there is no virtual equivalent of the £50 note whose value is reduced by multiple transactions, each transaction is unique and has no relationship to any other.Here's one take on not going cash-free
When you pay digitally, you always leave a digital footprint, and this footprint is easily monitored by financial institutions. Understandably, consumers are uneasy about their data being harvested or tracked by big businesses.
Many people also feel that cashless spending is more difficult to control. It’s simply too easy to overspend when you’re not looking at a finite, physical sum of money in your wallet or purse, so careful budgeting becomes important.
Beyond individual consumers, the cashless society could also prove costly for small businesses.
Most credit card and mobile payments attract a up to three per cent processing charge, which will quickly eat into small profit margins, making it hard for independent shops and small-scale specialist outlets.
In an unpredictable world, there is always a concern about system vulnerability. How resilient is the technology that supports a cashless society?
Don't all pensioners have bank accounts these days?Here's the far bigger problem than some pissed up blokes not being able to get a beer at Brixton's only cash-only bar:
Move to Cashless Society Will Disproportionately Affect Pensioners & the Poorest in UK
According to new research by customer advice website Which?, the nationwide trend towards cashless transactions will have a harmful effect on the most vuln...www.moneyexpert.com
Only Half of Low-Income Households Have Access to a Credit Card. Here's Why That's a Bad Thing
It's harder for some people to qualify for a credit card. Here's why that's a bigger problem than you might think.www.fool.com
A cashless society: what are the pros and cons?
Are we heading for a cashless society in the UK? The pandemic accelerated the move towards contactless and digital payments, but what are the pros and cons?www.unbiased.co.uk
And a US perspective which raises valid points:
Here's the far bigger problem than some pissed up blokes not being able to get a beer at Brixton's only cash-only bar:
Move to Cashless Society Will Disproportionately Affect Pensioners & the Poorest in UK
According to new research by customer advice website Which?, the nationwide trend towards cashless transactions will have a harmful effect on the most vuln...www.moneyexpert.com
Only Half of Low-Income Households Have Access to a Credit Card. Here's Why That's a Bad Thing
It's harder for some people to qualify for a credit card. Here's why that's a bigger problem than you might think.www.fool.com
A cashless society: what are the pros and cons?
Are we heading for a cashless society in the UK? The pandemic accelerated the move towards contactless and digital payments, but what are the pros and cons?www.unbiased.co.uk
And a US perspective which raises valid points:
I think this notice is untrue (unless possibly the pub is a "community pub and registered charity" - and their bank offers special cheap deals to charities)grosvenor is card only as well, and i have overspent in there a couple of times as a result
heres another perspective from a pub in swindon...not a publican so cant verify if this is true..
View attachment 352743
Another pub has said exactly the same thingI think this notice is untrue (unless possibly the pub is a "community pub and registered charity" - and their bank offers special cheap deals to charities)
Bank charges to businesses were always very particular in accounting for BOTH cash in and cash out.
Or is the Carpenter's Arms with some poncy bank like Metro, itself teetering on the brink to retain customers?