editor
hiraethified
Way to miss the point completely. As usual.I honestly don't get the attitude of some people. There's no symmetry.
Camp 1. Posters who do not work (through choice or otherwise). Therefore reduced income = little disposable income
Camp 2. Posters who work. Therefore higher income = more disposable income
That's all well and good. However, it seems fair game for Camp 1 to criticise Camp 2 for spending their disposable income. This includes cocktail bars.
If Camp 2 were to criticise Camp 1 for not doing the same there'd be uproar