Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Cold War Aviation Porn

The consensus among 10 year old boys at the time was that flying very low and very fast in a British 'plane was it, of course. Issues like procurement and inter-service rivalry went right over our tousled heads.
You had of course lost an empire but not yet found a role.
 
A photo taken from Concorde of a 229OCU F3 in K fit intercepting it.

FCd0CjCXoAQG5fu.jpg
 
Honestly can't tell if this is the NASA shuttle or the Buran - I think the former because of the boosters, but the two lads have that air of Soviet-ness about them.
STS in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn/Lewis Field (the SRBs and SSMEs are a giveaway), circa 1978. The guy in the foreground is William Gerstenmaier, now a VP at SpaceX (the other test engineer is Mauri Raita). In later years Glenn did some quite sophisticated modelling including investigating 'engine out' RTLS scenarios post-Challenger.
1988: The engine-out loads study in the 10-foot wind tunnel used a 6-foot long shuttle model, complete with operating hydrogen/oxygen main engines and boosters burning a gaseous fuel.
 
STS in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn/Lewis Field (the SRBs and SSMEs are a giveaway). The guy in the foreground is William Gerstenmaier, now a VP at SpaceX (the other test engineer is Mauri Raita). In later years Glenn did some quite sophisticated modelling including investigating 'engine out' RTLS scenarios post-Challenger.
1988: The engine-out loads study in the 10-foot wind tunnel used a 6-foot long shuttle model, complete with operating hydrogen/oxygen main engines and boosters burning a gaseous fuel.
William Gerstenmaier or Gareth from the Office (with guest appearance by Norm from Cheers)?
 
STS in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA Glenn/Lewis Field (the SRBs and SSMEs are a giveaway), circa 1978. The guy in the foreground is William Gerstenmaier, now a VP at SpaceX (the other test engineer is Mauri Raita). In later years Glenn did some quite sophisticated modelling including investigating 'engine out' RTLS scenarios post-Challenger.
1988: The engine-out loads study in the 10-foot wind tunnel used a 6-foot long shuttle model, complete with operating hydrogen/oxygen main engines and boosters burning a gaseous fuel.
^^^ This. Plus the fact it’s clearly the yanks as the soviets didn’t need to do any of this design/testing stuff as they just copied someone else’s homework.
 
^^^ This. Plus the fact it’s clearly the yanks as the soviets didn’t need to do any of this design/testing stuff as they just copied someone else’s homework.
OTOH, at least they wouldn't need another seven astronauts.

"The main advantage of Buran over STS is that is was made from start to be fully automated. So the computer can take decision more quickly than the crew in case of emergency to save the crew and the payload, by reducing thrust or even eject the shuttle (500 scenaries are stored in the computer). If the shuttle is ejected it will return safely in automatic flight to the landing strip. Moreover, the engines of Energia LV use liquid propellant and can be shutdown if wanted.


The pilot and the co-pilot can also be saved by the automatic ejection of their seats during the ascent (from 50 m to 35 km)."​

 
Would you go up in that?

Basing my future decision to go up in it on your response. After I've won the lottery obvs. So next Saturday.

When I was younger, almost certainly yes. I've been in a Polish Air Force MiG-29U.

But in my mid 50s and in a privately operated one where the technical support and currency training are going to be sketchy: no.
 
When I was younger, almost certainly yes. I've been in a Polish Air Force MiG-29U.

But in my mid 50s and in a privately operated one where the technical support and currency training are going to be sketchy: no.

That's what I was thinking, thank you. I'll spend the money on something safer like a bungee jump.
 

I watched that earlier as YouTube suggested it to me. If nothing else I thought the cgi renditions of the Foxbats whenever they weren’t using real footage were highly impressive- more so for what I assume must have been a pretty low budget production.

As a kid of the 70s & 80s who for whatever reason tended to side with the Soviets vs the Americans in any imaginary war in my head, the MIG-25 was always for me the ultimate Top Trumps fighter. Those exhaust nozzles were pre-puberty porn, really :D
 
Back
Top Bottom