...Cynthia Jarret - who died of shock being arrested for deportation in Tottenham, was a Tottenham perosn ...
Im not at all happy about how this was all decided.
The local community was never given an opportunity to have any input into this memorial.
But the Council are now agreeing to underwrite it.
It also looks like the Council will have to maintain the memorial.
As the Foundation have obtained the planning permission for this memorial surely its up to them to raise the funds?
The Brixton Buzz article says extra funds will come out of Section 106/ CIL money.
This is money meant to provide services/ infrastructure to benefit local community. That is the point of it. Not to plug funding gap for a Foundations planned memorial.
The decision to use Section 106 / Community Infrastructure Levy definitely should have been consulted on.
Diversion of this money to the memorial means local people have lost out.
Aesthetically, I think it's monstrous. And it troubles me that this sculpture, erected in memory of a single person, thirty-five years after the event, so dramatically dwarves, overwhelms and diminishes the war memorial a few metres away. The shooting of Cherry Groce was terrible (but it was a stupid, incompetent accident), but no commentators have been able to discover anything of note that she did either before or after the shooting. On the other hand, the modestly proportioned war memorial commemorates the thousands of lives heroically sacrificed by men and women in WW2.
I wish that Lambeth would drop the humbug, and acknowledge the essentially political purpose of the Cherry Groce memorial - it's a big raised middle finger to the police.
Were and are Mrs Groce, her friends, family and supporters and The Cherry Groce Foundation, as well as the people who rose up against the Metropolitan Police in Brixton on the evening of Saturday 28 September 1985, hours after Mrs Groce was shot by Inspector Douglas Lovelock - most of whom, I suspect, had lived in or around Brixton for all of their lives - "local people" or part of "the local community"?
In any event, given your concerns, will you and any of those whom you do consider to be "local people" and "the local community" be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial?
Were and are Mrs Groce, her friends, family and supporters and The Cherry Groce Foundation, as well as the people who rose up against the Metropolitan Police in Brixton on the evening of Saturday 28 September 1985, hours after Mrs Groce was shot by Inspector Douglas Lovelock - most of whom, I suspect, had lived in or around Brixton for all of their lives - "local people" or part of "the local community"?
In any event, given your concerns, will you and any of those whom you do consider to be "local people" and "the local community" be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial?
Were and are Mrs Groce, her friends, family and supporters and The Cherry Groce Foundation, as well as the people who rose up against the Metropolitan Police in Brixton on the evening of Saturday 28 September 1985, hours after Mrs Groce was shot by Inspector Douglas Lovelock - most of whom, I suspect, had lived in or around Brixton for all of their lives - "local people" or part of "the local community"?
In any event, given your concerns, will you and any of those whom you do consider to be "local people" and "the local community" be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial?
Were and are Mrs Groce, her friends, family and supporters and The Cherry Groce Foundation, as well as the people who rose up against the Metropolitan Police in Brixton on the evening of Saturday 28 September 1985, hours after Mrs Groce was shot by Inspector Douglas Lovelock - most of whom, I suspect, had lived in or around Brixton for all of their lives - "local people" or part of "the local community"?
In any event, given your concerns, will you and any of those whom you do consider to be "local people" and "the local community" be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial?
I see wikipedia draws parallels between Cynthia Jarrett's case and Cherry Groce's.Mrs Cynthia Jarrett was not being "deported" anywhere when she died after Metropolitan Police officers entered her home a week after the subject matter of this thread, Mrs Groce, was shot. She was - in common with Mrs Groce - a British housewife, born overseas. Their treatment as British housewives by the Metropolitan Police within a week of each other differed from the treatment other British housewives with sons suspected of crimes for reasons unconnected to the identity of their passports.
There won’t be any counter demo? Stop shit stirring.Will you be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial so that your concerns can be made clear to all?
No of, course there won't be a counter-demo. But I remain struck by the ugliness of the sculpture and the crude way that Lambeth has rammed it through.Will you be leading a counter-demonstration at the official opening of the memorial so that your concerns can be made clear to all?
I have to say, this is bollocks.If there was such a demand for this then it would not have needed the Council to step in and fund it.
The iplayer is your friendIt would seem from an interview between Andrew Marr and Mary Beard that David Adjaye is a guest on the Mary Beard show on BBC Two on Friday and they will be discussing the Cherry Groce monument.
A shot was shown of the monument on Marr - complete with people relaxing on the steps/seat.
Knowing Mary Beard she might hail this as the new people-friendly direction of monuments.
Inside Culture With Mary Beard
www.bbc.co.uk
I live Mary Beard - she appeals to all that cultural vacuum in my life - and she looks like my Auntie Pam.
Unfortunately this programme istarts hald-way through the Channel Four News - which is probably the BBC's secret agenda.
Not quite sure what this post is about in specifics to do with Lambeth.I see the purpose of statues/monuments as being a way to keep an event or person of note in people’s minds beyond the immediate generation. We’ve got a multitude of old statues of colonial generals and Victorian philanthropists that provided a focus of celebration to those who erected them in one generation, then a second purpose when in more enlightened times they’ve sparked a much needed national conversation on the horrors of our colonial past and how it’s effects still impact on people today. I reckon those news pictures of the Bristol statue being toppled by people power will become as iconic as some of the powerful news photos from the Vietnam war or the Bloody Sunday pic of the vicar waving a handkerchief as the British army murder his neighbors. They are a solid physical emblem of that particular moment in history and I think it is long overdue to give space in Brixton to commemorate that point in history when the local community fought back against police brutality, and it will make it harder for future generations to forget that moment with a nice big sculpture in a prominent position to remind us all. Making it a representation of one specific person is a good way of bringing it home to people that these were ordinary people - mums dads wives sons etc in a way that some abstract monument not linked to an individual might not .
I do agree that Lambeth should be better at consulting on such issues, but that would have opened up the debate to those reactionary elements that would try to paint the events of that time as simple criminality.
This is one occasion when I think Lambeth wielding its colossal mandate to govern out borough in the way it sees fit in the absence of any effective opposition as a good move. Why prevaricate on something like this, it needed doing and it’s done. If we had a committee system or if they consulted on absolutely everything then not thing would get done quickly and the drain on officer and councillor resources would have a detrimental effect on delivery. As for paying for it, I know a lot of old time monuments were paid fir by public subscription but they didn’t have council tax and section 106 money to spend. In the general scheme of things it’s a paltry amount and 106 money is income to spend on infrastructure yes but wind rush sq is such an important focal point for Brixton recognising the black community presence, that I see this (to me aesthetically ugly but then I think the Elgin marbles look crap) monument as a nice finishing touch to the sq.
Lambeth Labour are in an unassailable position Because they are popular with vast swathes of the electorate. If you doubt that try canvassing with an open mind and the most common response is that people are generally happy with the status quo thus the inability of the opposing party’s to have any luck in threatening Labours position as a one party state. When they are repeatedly elected with such landslides it’s their prerogative to act without worrying about public debate on occasions like this and I personally think fir once they’ve done the right thing.
going of subject slightly, People bleating on about it being a one party state have to recognise it’s the electorate that give them that position and it will only change when an alternative party can inspire more people to vote for them instead. This will only happen if people that care get out and do some hard work in the doorstep like the many hundreds of Lambeth Labour activists do week after week then we might get an opposition voice that goes beyond the irrelevant trio of greens and an even more irrelevant lone tory.