teuchter
je suis teuchter
Physical capabilities are linked to gender.
You don't say.
Physical capabilities are linked to gender.
With blokes that option may not be a practical one, so a more violent approach might be necessary.
See the difference yet?
And can you explain why you wouldn't apply the same to a woman?
Also, partly because such an aversion is likely bound up with notions of how status between men should be maintained, and how one's reputation in the eyes of women should be cultivated, and the ways in which the two are different.
Notions which I consider horribly old-fashioned and sooner gotten rid of, the better, I'm afraid.
Status between men (or between anyone) being judged by physical strength may have been appropriate or useful in primitive societies, but I don't think it is in any way a useful way to determine status in a civilised one.
I'm all for equality between the sexes, but it doesn't extend to giving women a right-hander.
No, I mean where are they? He's a child - and therefore their legal responsibility - yet they're letting this violent prick chat to the press and give the idea that it's just dandy to go around lamping women in the face over extremely trivial things.
@Rutita: I'd feel the same way.
Oh, I see. Well, I'm not sure if he is actually legally their responsibility any more, at 16 - he could move out and get married if he wanted to.
Not unless the law has changed without me noticing, he can't!
I'm all for equality between the sexes, but it doesn't extend to giving women a right-hander.
As opposed to the big, fat, white line of coke that you seem to have had?
*takes a seat beside LoL*
Thread of the year! Next time someone starts a thread asking about class I shall direct them here for the definitive explanation.
Ah, sorry, I thought he was the same age as the woman he smacked in the face.Oh, I see. Well, I'm not sure if he is actually legally their responsibility any more, at 16 - he could move out and get married if he wanted to.
I see one of those highly improbable, point-scoring scenarios I was referring to earlier has just been cooked up!And what if the bloke that has rendered that option impractical is not a bloke but a woman?
I see one of those highly improbable, point-scoring scenarios I was referring to earlier has just been cooked up!
No it's not.
Do you really find it highly improbable that there might be a situation where a man is not able to restrain a woman?
It's a very simple point - if the aggressor is a woman, and is stronger than you, and you are not able to restrain her, then why should you apply a different approach to that which you said you'd apply to exactly the same scenario but involving a male aggressor?
I've never aggressively hit anyone. (Except when I was a child).
Kindly do not avoid my earlier question for any more pages of this thread.
Please answer yes or no, have you hit a woman and in which case what was the situation?
(and no metaphysical hypothesis please)
Most interesting thing about this is the odd determination to misunderstand teuchter tbh.
Most interesting thing about this is the odd determination to misunderstand teuchter tbh.
He was going to accuse you of beating up women for fun because, obviously, anyone who thinks it's no worse than hitting a man must be into hitting women. Equally obviously, anyone who thinks it's particularly unacceptable to hit a woman must think it's fine to go around beating up men...Where's chico enrico gone? He seemed so impatient for my reply but now he's disappeared. I wanted to know what he was going to say next.
Seeing as you were so mustard keen to discover people's personal experiences earlier on, could you tell me how many times you've personally faced this situation and had to give a woman a slap in the mush?Do you really find it highly improbable that there might be a situation where a man is not able to restrain a woman?
Seeing as you were so mustard keen to discover people's personal experiences earlier on, could you tell me how many times you've personally faced this situation and had to give a woman a slap in the mush?
As for me, the answer = 0.
Personally I don't think it's ever OK to injure another person unless necessary in self defence or you have some kind of agreement between the two of you that you are both happy to engage in physical violence. Just before anyone pipes up saying that I am happy to hit women.
Well, exactly.
But I'm not arguing to dissolve the "don't hit women" taboo - I'm arguing to extend it so it becomes a "don't hit people" taboo.
I don't think it's OK for anyone to kick the shit out of anyone of any gender or any physical size.
The protocol is very simple. Try to stop people beating each other up if you can (balanced of course against the risk to yourself).
I've never aggressively hit anyone. (Except when I was a child).
The difference you are talking about is the strength of the person I'm trying to restrain. That is related to, but not one and the same as their gender.
If I have the option of restraining them, I'd do that, male or female.
If I decided as a last resort that violence were necessary, then that decision would be based on the physical capabilities of the person involved, not their gender.
just out of interest, i take it at some point in your life you have hit a man?
may i then enquire if you have also hit a woman and what the real-life situation was?
personally i think there is a very different psychological 'dynamic' from hitting a man to hitting a woman and as such would not be an 'easy' think for a normal, balanced male to do were it not truly a 'last resort' in the face of extreme threat of physical danger to self or others.
Not unless the law has changed without me noticing, he can't!
I haven't been reading teuchter's posts as "I gladly hit women, as gladly as I would hit men, if I wasn't such a coward" for whatever that's worth, quimcunx.