Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Carlton Mansions co-op, Coldharbour Lane, Brixton - history and news

I do not understand this. Without any "community" consultation the Somerleyton road project will have 60 units for older people. So Council are getting rid of homes that older people like and then building new ones on Somerleyton. Bonkers.

makes me wonder what the differential between developable land on Effra Rd, and on Somerleyton Rd is.

Relocating the poor to a lower-cost area is hardly a new thing, after all.

BTW this was decision taken by the Council. Not even my Ward Cllrs knew about it. So much for the Somerleyton road project being "Co produced" :rolleyes::facepalm: I only knew because it was mentioned in passing at a recent consultation meeting. I did ask when this was decided as it was not consulted about. Also an older person at the meeting said that older people often prefer a smaller group of up to 30units.

I did point out this was a big change to the scheme. Not that I was necessarily against it. My problem was that I thought the project was being "Co-produced".

Its yet another example of how the Council really wield the power. "Co operative Council" and "Co production" are done when it suits them.

It's basically PR puff.
 
I viewed that house. Good working order is obviously highly subjective but in my professional opinion it was way beyond a general refurbishment project and essentially required a rebuild behind a restored façade.
It was in far worse condition than other houses in the street which went for £705-£720,000 only twelve months previously.
 
Have arranged to donate Coop files and my archive of "Short Life" photos/ books etc to Lambeth Archives. Want them somewhere safe now.

They are very interested as they have little on "Short Life" and "Self Help" housing. Which played a big role in Brixton / Lambeth from late 70s onwards.

Of particular interest is a series of photos I saved from being binned. Which cover the early S/L in Lambeth. I do not know who took them. They were commissioned to show S/L in Lambeth.

Also some books I have kept/ saved on squatting and S/L which are out of print.

Lambeth Archives have little on this period. A lot of it has been lost as people have moved etc.

Its an important history to document.
 
Last edited:
I don't think anyone's arguing about the principle that the building would be taken back by the council eventually. It's the way they have gone about it which seems to have been done in a more agressive way than necessary and which has shown a disregard for the welfare of the people living there.

I realise there are reasons people find it upsetting, I simply wanted to check my understanding was correct
 
Have arranged to donate Coop files and my archive of "Short Life" photos/ books etc to Lambeth Archives. Want them somewhere safe now.

They are very interested as they have little on "Short Life" and "Self Help" housing. Which played a big role in Brixton / Lambeth from late 70s onwards.

Of particular interest is a series of photos I saved from being binned. Which cover the early S/L in Lambeth. I do not know who took them. They were commissioned to show S/L in Lambeth.

Also some books I have kept/ saved on squatting and S/L which are out of print.

Lambeth Archives have little on this period. A lot of it has been lost as people have moved etc.

Its an important history to document.
Happy to post the photos up on B Buzz too!
 
Blossom has come out in front courtyard:

scaled_full_ecdfb3516b582f3d7519.JPG
 
Have arranged to donate Coop files and my archive of "Short Life" photos/ books etc to Lambeth Archives. Want them somewhere safe now.

They are very interested as they have little on "Short Life" and "Self Help" housing. Which played a big role in Brixton / Lambeth from late 70s onwards.

Of particular interest is a series of photos I saved from being binned. Which cover the early S/L in Lambeth. I do not know who took them. They were commissioned to show S/L in Lambeth.

Also some books I have kept/ saved on squatting and S/L which are out of print.

Lambeth Archives have little on this period. A lot of it has been lost as people have moved etc.

Its an important history to document.
The photographs may have been taken by Julian Quan. He certainly did a fair bit of recording Short Life for the Fed.in the early 80's.
 
I went through all the old stuff I had kept on Sunday and we took it down to Lambeth Archives on Monday.

The archivist was very pleased to get this donation. He reckons it will be an important archive. Lambeth Archives have little on Short Life/ Self Help housing.

When I looked through all the old stuff ( ended up being three large crates plus some smaller cases of docs) it includes a lot of that is about the general history of "Short Life" in Lambeth not just the Mansions.

I also donated my old Urban75 T shirts editor and one produced by Rushcroft Road Action group. Its all part of Brixtons history. Archivist was pleased to have them.

The archivist will now go through the donation and catalogue it. This will take some time. It will not be publicly available until that is done.
 
The photographs may have been taken by Julian Quan. He certainly did a fair bit of recording Short Life for the Fed.in the early 80's.

The name was on the photos. Cannot remember what is was. It was done as exhibition of photos of Self Help/ Short Life housing.
 
I went through all the old stuff I had kept on Sunday and we took it down to Lambeth Archives on Monday.

The archivist was very pleased to get this donation. He reckons it will be an important archive. Lambeth Archives have little on Short Life/ Self Help housing.

When I looked through all the old stuff ( ended up being three large crates plus some smaller cases of docs) it includes a lot of that is about the general history of "Short Life" in Lambeth not just the Mansions.

I also donated my old Urban75 T shirts editor and one produced by Rushcroft Road Action group. Its all part of Brixtons history. Archivist was pleased to have them.

The archivist will now go through the donation and catalogue it. This will take some time. It will not be publicly available until that is done.
That's really good of you to donate that stuff to the archive, too many people assume it's worthless and skip everything.
 
That's really good of you to donate that stuff to the archive, too many people assume it's worthless and skip everything.

I think things get lost gradually. People move and clear out every now and again.

Some of the donations go back 30 years ago.

I have old correspondence from Solon about the Self Help Coops. Also donated a Self Help housing repairs book by a Solon architect.

Solon was originally set up as a Worker Coop. Everyone had same pay including the cleaner. There were radical architects in 70s who supported more smaller scale housing. 70s is often remembered as time of big top down projects. Councils used to have there own architects departments to produce large scale urban developments. At least they used to build Council housing.

Solon architects were influenced by people like Colin Ward ( Anarchist) and John Turner. Turner looked at Third World ( that was the name then) shanty towns. He argued for the people living in the shanty towns to be able to improve there own housing ( Self Help) rather than large State run slum clearance. The shanty towns were usually on land that was squatted. There are still arguments about this in housing sector. The Marxist Mike Davis "Planet of Slums" is highly critical of Turner.

Originally Carlton Mansions was part of a larger Coop. "Arcological Housing Coop" which comprised the Mansions as well as houses in Lilford road and Lingham street.

Also some houses on Railton Road. These were demolished after riots by Council. Its where the open space is now on Railton road. A lot of the "Self Help" works done were to replace things smashed by Council. Council used to smash up insides of properties to deter squatting.

The photo exhibition I donated contains photos of Lingham street.

Arcological was the name as the guy who started it believed industrial civilization would not survive. Out of the ruins people would re use the remains to live and house themselves. Hence "Arcology".
It has to be remembered that late 60s early 70s ideas of over population, the 70s OPEC oil price shock etc had led to new interest in Green type issues and rejection of the social norms of the 50s.

Then (late 70s) the Mansions was communal. Different flats for different purposes.

The alternative society partly came out of a rejection of post war society. Marcuse ( One Dimensional Man was a cult book) predicted the rise of an "administered society" a merging of State Communism and Capitalism. People would lose there individualism. They would become administered subjects.

So living communally and experimenting with different relationships was encouraged ( or required). From what I was told it was very much male dominated. This changed when the Mansions broke away from rest of Arcology. Feminist critique of hippy men was part of reason it split off. Mansions always from that time aimed for 50% female membership.

Was talking to someone who might record the history. All the above came up. Made me realize that as a community its history mirrored the social changes in society.

As I looked through the stuff I had saved I also found a lot architects studies of the S/L housing. Plans to make it permanent. These are now records of the now disappeared Coops.

The donation also therefore is of interest to architects and those doing urban studies of a different way of doing housing. That is now lost. I think a lot of it is still relevant.
 
Gramsci It's really grown! Looks very healthy!

It grew fast once it got up to upper floors. Gets more sun.

Does not damage the pointing.

Squirrels like it.

The archives would welcome photos.

I have a lot on FB and also really old ones pre digital of Coop members working on the Mansions. Have not donated them yet as need to ask people in them whether thats ok. Though I need to get them somewhere safe.
 
We had to remove the ivy from our house. Was a real shame but it was totally fucking the wall and roof plus removing it revealed some nice (until then hidden) carvings
 
Very true. We replaced it with (non invasive I think the term was) climbing roses which were great for the five minutes each year they were in bloom but it was never the same
 
Norty Rushy.

It does grow all the way along that railway line - I lived in Mayall Rd and it was on the railway line behind, but it never came down into our yard.
 
Isn't it the type of mortar that means whether ivy damages buildings or not? Lime mortar it destroys, but modern mortar it doesn't? Or something...
 
Back
Top Bottom