kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Where's my Delorean?
No.For a non scientist, please could you elaborate?
Net gain means that there is more energy coming out than going in? And that has been achieved?
Yes, yes, I'm sure they've cracked it this time - as we all know, the move from tenuous proof-of-concept to viable commercial reality is practically negligible. The number of billionaire back-shed boffins who've made that easy-peasy leap is astounding. And I'm absolutely certain that the claims these chaps are making have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with attracting more funding. I confidently expect to be driving around in a fusion powered hover-car by the end of the year.that's cos all previous fusion 'promises' have been based on the frankly insane tokamak design. that's what's given fusion a bad name and has spread the assumption that fusion requires insane temperature and pressure. all it really requires is fast-moving ions.
you can get ions to fuse on your desktop with a hirsch-farnsworth device. the poywell just removes that design's barrier to unity - the solid electric grid - and replaces it with a permeable electron cloud. accelerating +ve ions is easy with an electric field.
Just go away and do some background reading for now.Yes, yes, I'm sure they've cracked it this time - as we all know, the move from tenuous proof-of-concept to viable commercial reality is practically negligible. The number of billionaire back-shed boffins who've made that easy-peasy leap is astounding. And I'm absolutely certain that the claims these chaps are making have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with attracting more funding. I confidently expect to be driving around in a fusion powered hover-car by the end of the year.
Yes, yes, I'm sure they've cracked it this time - as we all know, the move from tenuous proof-of-concept to viable commercial reality is practically negligible. The number of billionaire back-shed boffins who've made that easy-peasy leap is astounding. And I'm absolutely certain that the claims these chaps are making have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with attracting more funding. I confidently expect to be driving around in a fusion powered hover-car by the end of the year.
First of all, our work has been peer reviewed. An independent panel of experts has looked at these results. I don’t believe that there was anyone on the panel who has less than 40 years experience working with magnetic confinement. It included senior professors and people who have managed the fusion program. We asked them for their honest opinions and that’s exactly what we got. We are proceeding with our program in line with their recommendations.
Yes, there are neutrons and the numbers are consistent with the plasmas we are measuring. However, neutrons can be deceptive. A lot of fusion researchers have gotten in trouble in the past by relying on these types of measurements. You need to know where they come from and that's difficult to measure.
And while $200m might sound like a lot, in comparison with stuff like the National Ignition Facility (about $4bn so far) and JET/ITER (anything upwards of €15bn so far), it's bascially pennies.
Bussard said:We’ve spent billions on tokamak research and one thing we’ve learnt is they’re no damn good.
Fusion works – you only have to look up in the sky at night to see thousands of fusion reactors. And not one of them is toroidal.
There's always a real chance for success, it's always just around the corner, the experimental results are always thoroughly promising, the attendant extrapolations equally ebullient.... this time next year Rodney...I understand your cynicism, but won't you accept that there's a real chance for success here? For the amount of money required, and the benefits if realised, it's got to be worth a go.
You've got to love that sort of rhetorical histrionics. "Fusion works"? No shit Sherlock. Who suggested it didn't?Bussard said:Fusion works – you only have to look up in the sky at night to see thousands of fusion reactors. And not one of them is toroidal.
Guessed you missed this bit ^We’ve spent billions on tokamak research and one thing we’ve learnt is they’re no damn good.
...
I remember watching a doc about JET/ITER and the scientists are proudly saying 'Yes, the core temperature in here is 1 million times hotter than the core of the sun!!' and thinking 'Why would you need to do that? If the sun can fuse at a lower temperature, why aren't you seemingly making things harder? Impressively so, buy harder nonetheless.'
"Fusion works" + tokamaks don't == "WB-D Polywell Device" worksGuessed you missed this bit ^
The folks at talk.polywell have a FOIA request that should deliver goods tomorrow, giving us loads of detail on the machines they're currently working on. Things look brighter and brighter
So the outlook is not as gloomy as I said on that other thread the money lasts until the end of the year, so let's see if there's any news then...As of 2Q/2011, the WB-8 device has demonstrated excellent plasma confinement properties. EMC2 is conducting high power pulsed experiments on WB-8 to test the Wiffle-Ball plasma scaling law on plasma energy and confinement.
During 4Q of 2011, EMC2 has modified the electron injectors to increase the plasma heating. The higher plasma density in WB-8 prompted the need for higher heating power. We plan to operate WB-8 in high beta regime with the modified electron injectors during 1Q of 2012.
Amount of Award $7,855,504
Funds Invoiced/Received $3,382,826
I'm amazed that they are doing so well given such a low level of funding.Latest Recovery Act report is out, with the tiniest snippet of info:
This is generally good news. Higher plasma density = more likely fusion. In plasma physics, Beta is the ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic pressure. It's a measure of efficiency of containment. Operating at high Beta means they're making good progress.
Still plenty of funding in the pot
Well the us navy are still dreaming of rail gun battle ships that use ludicrous amounts of power.
So they are motivated.
Persuading the republicans they can tell the middle east to go to hell is win win
TBF navies have been a fan of railguns since they were first dreamed up. Removemagazinessailors from a ship, and you've eliminated the single biggest potential cause of destruction.
FTFY
But without their mucky mags wouldn't they all go boat happy?TBF navies have been a fan of railguns since they were first dreamed up. Remove magazines from a ship, and you've eliminated the single biggest potential cause of destruction.
But without their mucky mags wouldn't they all go boat happy?