I think that's a shame. As someone towards whom I imagine this latest criticism is directed, I would welcome the chance to learn more about longstanding local issues and how I could help the area in which I now live.
I can understand how longtime posters feel marginalised by the changes happening in Brixton and to the forum to which they used to turn to vent with, and for support from, likeminded individuals no longer being 100% aligned to their views. But to shut down anyone who is not old Brixton on here and refuse to see their point of view, to level the accusation of "Tory scum" at them without engaging with them on the issues in an open-minded and non-knee jerk way, that seems to me to be short-sighted. We all live here and if we are to continue to do so then we should try to understand a little more about each other and listen to each other's points of view.
My view are not necessarily wrong. They may be more right wing than the views of others on here, but that makes them no less valid as views. Perhaps one of the reasons that the politics forums are better places in which to engage in discussions is because neither side of an argument feels that the other is encroaching on its "turf". I accept that some of my responses could be seen as personal attacks. But that is because so much of what is thrown back, with which all posters in the past may have agreed, is now a personal attack to the changing demographic of the board. So I suppose there is a choice (which I think T&P (?) mentioned earlier). Is the Brixton forum open to anyone, or should anyone '"nu-Brixton" no longer contribute?
Places change, old stands alongside new, large alongside small and wealth alongside poverty, and we need to learn to accept that without fighting it just for the sake of it.
This is what you said in post 854
No you don't understand it.
Change is inevitableSorry, perhaps I didn't express myself properly. I meant to say that I understand that changes are happening, and that those changes will make longtime posters feel marginalised. I know that I do not, and cannot ever understand what it feels like for those who are going through it.
But not all change is for the better.Change is inevitable
Have you got a remotely intelligent point to make?Change is inevitable
And the change that is happening in Brixton is making life quantifiably worse for a whole lot of people.But not all change is for the better.
In case anyone is bovvered
Greens increased vote from last election. LDs did poorly considering the amount of effort they put in.
Still a rock solid Labour ward.
Do you mean the gentrification of Brixton, taken in isolation, has made life quantifiably worse for a whole lot of people in Brixton.And the change that is happening in Brixton is making life quantifiably worse for a whole lot of people.
I think that is very much so. It also would not surprise me if most Labour voters thought they were voting for Corbyn rather than the policies of the ruling clique at Lambeth council.Greens increased vote from last election. LDs did poorly considering the amount of effort they put in.
Still a rock solid Labour ward.
I know you don't live here, but I thought that was fairly obvious. Do you think the residents of Cressingham Gardens want their estate flattened? Do you think the arch traders wanted to be kicked out or have their rents doubled or even tripled? Did you think that the Guinness Trust residents or those long serving members of the community in Carlton Mansions, Clifton Mansions, Rushcroft Road etc wanted to be turfed out? Do you think traders wanted their rents doubled or even tripled? Do you think Kaff, The Grosvenor and the Canterbury all wanted to close? Do you think residents have welcomed people shouting and pissing in the streets all night?Do you mean the gentrification of Brixton, taken in isolation, has made life quantifiably worse for a whole lot of people in Brixton.
Urgh! That is shit!
Seriously! How can someone not notice that mistake."Being normal is robing"
WTF?!
Seriously! How can someone not notice that mistake.
It's a really terrible idea. Especially when people don't even realise it's meant to be spelt wrong. That makes it even more shit!It's a terrible idea with even worse execution.
Weird though that they spelt 'Fuck' correctly as that's the one thing you might understand if they chose to obscure the word.Pretty sure it's deliberate. As in spelling things correctly is "normal" & "boring". It's a terrible idea with even worse execution.
They like their customers to pogo to the bar to buy their £13 small bottles of beer because they're so fucking punk rock.safety pins ....it's what to wear in brewdog
Tbf they have nicked some of Malcolm Maclarens business practices.They like their customers to pogo to the bar to buy their £13 small bottles of beer because they're so fucking punk rock.
Of course not. I think all that is shit. Nobody on here thinks otherwise. In fact if the Canterbury was still open we would still be living in Brixton. But that’s not what I asked though.I know you don't live here, but I thought that was fairly obvious. Do you think the residents of Cressingham Gardens want their estate flattened? Do you think the arch traders wanted to be kicked out or have their rents doubled or even tripled? Did you think that the Guinness Trust residents or those long serving members of the community in Carlton Mansions, Clifton Mansions, Rushcroft Road etc wanted to be turfed out? Do you think traders wanted their rents doubled or even tripled? Do you think Kaff, The Grosvenor and the Canterbury all wanted to close? Do you think residents have welcomed people shouting and pissing in the streets all night?
Jesus. Yes of course it can be 'quantifiably' calculated and measured on an individual basis. Because it affects each person differently.You said gentrification has made Brixton “quantifiably” worse. That means it has been or can be accurately measured. Or quantified. I doubt it has been and I’m not sure it even could be quantified. My post is just asking if you know better. I would be very interested in reading that
Of course not. I think all that is shit. Nobody on here thinks otherwise. In fact if the Canterbury was still open we would still be living in Brixton. But that’s not what I asked though.
You said gentrification has made Brixton “quantifiably” worse. That means it has been or can be accurately measured. Or quantified. I doubt it has been and I’m not sure it even could be quantified. My post is just asking if you know better. I would be very interested in reading that