Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumours and general chat: Summer - Autumn 2018

Status
Not open for further replies.
In my view the majority of gammon-faced posters on the Daily Mail hark back to their perceptions of a bygone era. That is not really what gentrification is about.

But it's reassuring to know that you're not open to any sort of debate. Your view or no view. A little immature.

When a view completely misunderstands, or wilfully misrepresents, a well documented and researched subject then I'm not interested in hearing it.

When a view completely ignores the plight of the poor and disenfranchised then I'm not interested in hearing it.
 

Do we have a definition of acting like a dick? Because it seems to be from recent posts that anyone with a differing view from the old school members of this board is being a dick. And when they try to stand up for their views and explain them coherently there is no interest in engaging.

My perceived attacks on you have been because of your hypocrisy. In the same way that you attack others who do not share your view.
 
Do we have a definition of acting like a dick? Because it seems to be from recent posts that anyone with a differing view from the old school members of this board is being a dick. And when they try to stand up for their views and explain them coherently there is no interest in engaging.

My perceived attacks on you have been because of your hypocrisy. In the same way that you attack others who do not share your view.
Newly arrived poster rocks up into the forum, starts insulting regular posters, dismisses them as immature or repeatedly declares them to be hypocrites based on some really bonkers reasoning as also witnessed in your previous personal attempts to attack me.

You know, that kind of thing. HTH.

Try sticking to the topic rather than trying to insult everyone who doesn't subscribe to your particular worldview.
 
Do we have a definition of acting like a dick? Because it seems to be from recent posts that anyone with a differing view from the old school members of this board is being a dick. And when they try to stand up for their views and explain them coherently there is no interest in engaging.
That is pretty much spot on.
 
That is pretty much spot on.
Except it's not seeing as this new arrival is the one constantly launching personal attacks at other posters (see his posting history for more examples). Still, I'm guessing that you're just happy seeing another right wing face on these boards, eh?
 
Newly arrived poster rocks up into the forum, starts insulting regular posters, dismisses them as immature or repeatedly declares them to be hypocrites based on some really bonkers reasoning as also witnessed in your previous personal attempts to attack me.

You know, that kind of thing. HTH.

Try sticking to the topic rather than trying to insult everyone who doesn't subscribe to your particular worldview.

Every forum has its own unique phrases that new posters have to get used to, but thank you, I think I'm starting to pick up on these now.

"Really bonkers reasoning" = "An argument with which an established poster doesn't agree".

And "insulting everyone who doesn't subscribe to your particular world view" = "acting like a dick" except where (and this subtle distinction has only recently become evident" dismissing someone as "another new member to file under "probably a Tory; definitely a dick"" does not equal "acting like a dick".

Thanks for clearing that up, have a lovely evening.
 
Every forum has its own unique phrases that new posters have to get used to, but thank you, I think I'm starting to pick up on these now.

"Really bonkers reasoning" = "An argument with which an established poster doesn't agree".

And "insulting everyone who doesn't subscribe to your particular world view" = "acting like a dick" except where (and this subtle distinction has only recently become evident" dismissing someone as "another new member to file under "probably a Tory; definitely a dick"" does not equal "acting like a dick".

Thanks for clearing that up, have a lovely evening.
Except it's been you starting with the insults, you div. :facepalm:
 
Except it's not seeing as this new arrival is the one constantly launching personal attacks at other posters (see his posting history for more examples). Still, I'm guessing that you're just happy seeing another right wing face on these boards, eh?
Why don’t you quit the ad hominems eh? FAQ says you’re not supposed to be a dick.
 
Last edited:
Seeing as you've predictably piped up, please detail how posting up a relevant and topical photo illustrating a point in response to an ongoing discussion on this thread is in any way comparable to a hashtagged random photo on the commercial social media service, Instagram. Thanks.
People don’t post random photos on Instagram .

They post what they believe to be relevant and topical ones.

A hashtag provides context and allows it to be part of an ongoing discussion.
 
Banning someone for not sharing your view isn’t really in the spirit of a forum open to different sorts of people to express their views, is it?

If you want the forum to be a place for your own egos to be massaged when everyone agrees with you, fine. But if you don’t then don’t take offence when someone has a different view.
Nobody has banned you yet although you are clearly ignoring the one guideline not to be a dick by clearly being a dick.
 
People don’t post random photos on Instagram .

They post what they believe to be relevant and topical ones.

A hashtag provides context and allows it to be part of an ongoing discussion.
Deeply fascinating. Is there a point here?
 
Too much vibrancy it seems:
Residents flats on Coldharbour Lane that are newly refurbished but lack double glazing recently complained both to the council and to local MP Helen Hayes about noise that they claimed came from Club 414 opposite.

Noise tests by the council showed that the club was not exceeding official limits, but one of the complaining residents told the Blog that he would be giving up his flat because of disturbed sleep.

Council launches consultation on new licensing policy
Of course, the real culprit in this is people like the multi millionaire Jerry Knight and Lexadon who keep building flats without sufficient soundproofiing next to existing pubs and venues. I very much doubt that he gives a flying fuck if his profiteering results in the closing down of existing venues, but it's greedy developers who are driving the closure of pubs and clubs.
 
Moves into ' vibrant ' Brixton, opposite a nightclub and pub and then complains :facepalm:
Sums up the sheer arrogance of these yuppie/city boy/Daddy financed incomers. They want the town to change to suit their selfish needs. If I was in charge of licensing, every time a nu-Brixton resident rocks into town and complains about the existing levels of noise, the bar would automatically get an hour extension to their late licence.
 
Looking at estate agents blurb for Clifton mansions/ Brixton, nightlife and entertainment gets 4 to 5 stars and no doubt that was one of the selling points to these fuckwits.
 
Some photos from last night. It's great to see the Queen's Head back but I have to say the 414 is a much better venue for live music. The sound at the QH was abysmal last night and the lighting is horrible too. Hopefully the new owner will sort it out soon.

It's a shame that the two competing nights have effectively 'split the vote' in Brixton - neither is as good as the original night at the 414.

weds-brixton-sept-2018-01.jpg


weds-brixton-sept-2018-09.jpg


weds-brixton-sept-2018-11.jpg


Wednesday night in Brixton: Wicked Wednesday at the Queen’s Head, Late Night Jam at Club 414
 
Sums up the sheer arrogance of these yuppie/city boy/Daddy financed incomers. They want the town to change to suit their selfish needs. If I was in charge of licensing, every time a nu-Brixton resident rocks into town and complains about the existing levels of noise, the bar would automatically get an hour extension to their late licence.

I have a couple of questions. It isn't an attack on you personally, I am not being a dick, I am trying to understand how various competing views can be reconciled.

Assuming that "yuppie/city boy/Daddy financed incomers" are high earners, they will pay more tax. That tax will be used, in part, to fund central government grants disbursed to London boroughs including Lambeth. Is it the case that you are happy for these people to exist, to contribute more tax and for Lambeth (and thus all of us who live in Lambeth) to benefit, but you do not want them living in Brixton, or would you prefer that they did not exist at all?

If you would prefer that they did not exist at all, what are your proposals for bridging the gap in funding, assuming (which is a whole other topic) that Lambeth could not bridge it by being more efficient and saving money on pointless projects (which I think we all agree that they do).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom