Jesus. Yes of course it can be 'quantifiably' calculated and measured on an individual basis. Because it affects each person differently.
But you'd know that if you lived here and talked to people who are on the sharp end of gentrification, rent rises, evictions, the growing poverty divide and the rise of exclusive, unaffordable bars and restaurants for all those essential "occasional treats."
I think that is very much so. It also would not surprise me if most Labour voters thought they were voting for Corbyn rather than the policies of the ruling clique at Lambeth council.
I would be loath to bring up anti semitism as a party in literature, if just because it might normalise it. Besides, I bet it comes up at the door regularly enough when people tell off Labour canvassers. Would be interesting to know from anyone who did it for them if it did come up much
I guess even if the Greens were playing dirty (as far as I know they weren't) they might steer clear of the anti-Semitism issue because they have their own debate on this for some of the same reasons:Well I wonder about that. One might think the anti semitism issue might have reduced vote. Didn't happen in Coldharbour ward.
Not did the LDs or Greens bring up Labour party anti semitism issue up in their election literature.
My experience of this site is that Ed and the Mods do a good job. Btw I feel no one really gives Mods credit for work they do.
Do you have a point, or are you just busy acting like a dick?Never mind
Yes. Would love to see this quantification on an area like Brixton or Hackney as a whole. Individual cases will be worse off but I wonder as a whole are neighbourhoods quantifiably worse off.I think he means that cost of living in Brixton (whether rent, food, drink, socialising...) has increased through gentrification at a greater rate and by a greater amount that would be the case through the course of normal inflation, which is easy for someone to quantify.
Yes. Would love to see this quantification on an area like Brixton or Hackney as a whole. Individual cases will be worse off but I wonder as a whole are neighbourhoods quantifiably worse off.
After recently reading Factfulness I’ve been trying to find info on this. Looking places like in places like ONS etc I can’t find anything.
Yes very difficult to measure. I couldn’t find anywhere it has been done, which is why I was interested when editor brought it up.Depends what your criteria for worse off would be?
How do you quantify Brixton or Hackney?
You'd have to break it down into wards, Businesses, residents, local charities (are they needing more or less)
Is it just financial? Can you measure the happiness, hopes, comfort, dreams of people.
Can you measure the impact of losing long term residents and businesses on today's Brixton and it's remaining/current residents?
Quite a task to measure. I wonder if it's been done anywhere before?
misogyny an aulder hatred. But wouldn't expect a mann to recognise thatI guess even if the Greens were playing dirty (as far as I know they weren't) they might steer clear of the anti-Semitism issue because they have their own debate on this for some of the same reasons:
Caroline Lucas resigns from the Stop the War Coalition
this Wikipedia article might explain why if you go to the last section (notable members). Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway are on the list - both have been vigorously attacked as anti-Semites.
I confess I'm a bit naive on this issue, but I managed to acquire this book
View attachment 147022
by the former councillor for Brixton Hill Ward (or Town Hall ward as it then was 1986-1990) and now MP for Bassettlaw (and scourge of Ken Livingstone).
Maybe when I've tucked into this I can provide a full assessment.
Nothing is so painful to the human mind as a great and sudden changeBut not all change is for the better.
Yep. You've nailed it right there.Think you're barking up the wrong tree here my friend, of course neighbourhoods will be quantifiably better off under gentrification because the quantifiably worse off are the ones who are being replaced by yuppies. Also much of the negative impact is not quantifiable but emotional, like for example replacing wc pubs with yuppie bars or flats will lead to isolation and less community thereby making more people leave [you said as much in your comment about the Canterbury elsewhere]. I am actually a little concerned that your insistence on statistics and factfulness [lol] betrays a [deliberate] misunderstanding and that kind of undermines your qualification to comment on the process cos you might well be someone benefitting from it....
Yes very difficult to measure. I couldn’t find anywhere it has been done, which is why I was interested when editor brought it up.
I think you’ll find it was the editor. But I’m not interested in arguing here. It does seem the usual suspects are though.You brought up quantifying the effects of gentrication.
I think you’ll find it was the editor. But I’m not interested in arguing here. It does seem the usual suspects are though.
Yes, but Mr Retro wanted to run with what is an absolutely obvious statement and deliver some Huge Fact-Laden Point or another which failed to get off the ground (see post #1062).
Yes, but Mr Retro wanted to run with what is an absolutely obvious statement and deliver some Huge Fact-Laden Point or another which failed to get off the ground (see post #1062).
Shame you can't be honest about your motives here, especially seeing as I wasn't the only poster to rumble you. Oh well.The type of discussion I was trying to have, I realise is not possible here. I may return to it later if I have the energy.
Lambeth is an inner London borough with a mixed picture on poverty and inequality. The poverty rate of almost 30% is above the London average of 27%. Lambeth has a high rate of infant mortality and premature mortality as well. 59% of Lambeth homeless households who the borough places in temporary accommodation are moved outside the borough, which is the second highest rate in London. On the positive side, Lambeth is in the lower half of boroughs for evictions and above average for delivery of affordable homes. 19.5% of workers here earn less than the living wage, which is lower than the London average of 21%.