'mass migration' is a descriptive term not a politically loaded term. you say as much yourself when you say that it was immediate.I've asked Slo mo his agenda and I've taken the trouble to go over his posting record. He still hasn't answered to say if he is a Tory voter.
He does say EU immigration is bad. He uses the term "mass" migration. It's that kind of terminology which is tight wing.
I don't know what London you lived in. When Poles got right to come here thousands arrived. Suddenly I was working with Poles. It was sudden.
I don't think working class Londoners were privileged. If anything it wasn't in the cynical selfish economic interests of working class Londoners to have a load of Poles here. No different from a small town. Which btw I came from. My brother still lives there. He said they were all going on about immigrants. This issue of course came up with Commonwealth citizens coming here after war. Backlash led to 1971 act when they lower right to freedom of movement in commonwealth. No different from Poles.
London is hardly privileged. It's that the working class people I know see it as a rich/ poor divide. Class not race/ immigration.
I see this in Brixton. People do not go on about immigrants or race. They go on as about Pop or the NR social cleansing of arches. They talk about Grenfell. Do in London the resentment us against the well off/ social cleansing of London. It's class issue.
Which , as evidenced here on Brixton forum, some see as prejudice.
I see at as Londoners on whole as seeing the real issue. Class not immigratiion.
you appear to be avoiding the question as to whether having an opinion on immigration policy is automaticaly racist and whether policy may or may not have had an impact on how the recent windrush issue has arisen (or maybe I am missing your point). or whether this is something that the working class only have the right to comment on. and working/middle class is not binary.
anyway, it's late. cheers.