Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumour and general chat - August 2014

Status
Not open for further replies.
Our builder bought a house in a (then) unfashionable part of Fulham in 1985 or thereabouts for £13K! Nobody wanted to live there apparently! And he tells me that in 1984 there wouldn't have been any white people living on our street (not so sure about that). My builder is ace - he used to play cricket with Viv Richards and hang out with Peter Hain and Darcus Howe at the Caribbean Social Club in the '60s. He knows everybody and everything. :thumbs:
 
Now you're talking. Tax those parasites hard.

It's foreigners who really benefit from buy-to-let etc. They are exempt from capital gains tax, for example. A lot of so-called "affordable" homes are sold off-plan to middle class investors from Singapore or China. There needs to be hefty property taxes on foreign buyers in this country - and quick.
 
It's foreigners who really benefit from buy-to-let etc. They are exempt from capital gains tax, for example. A lot of so-called "affordable" homes are sold off-plan to middle class investors from Singapore or China. There needs to be hefty property taxes on foreign buyers in this country - and quick.
Loads of home grown buy-to-let investors do rather nicely out of it too.
 
Today's McSweeney's essay has a certain resonance, and a few salty LOLz:




WE PROVIDE MEALS THAT ARE COMPLETELY UNAFFORDABLE AND UNAPPEALING TO PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

BY PABLO GOLDSTEIN

When we founded Hirl five years ago as a locally owned cannery in the cramped confines of a former pupusería, we never dreamed that our modest storefront would change the world. What was originally established as a creative collective intended to vertically integrate both the production and sales of artisanally crafted jams, soon morphed into a bustling, award-winning restaurant that brings in food aficionados from across the world. But despite all our accolades during these whirlwind years, Hirl has managed to stay true to the two tenets of our business:

Using only the freshest, naturally-occurring ingredients on Mother Gaia, and providing meals that are completely unaffordable and unappealing to people who actually live in this neighborhood.

OUR MISSION
Opening a restaurant is one of the most daunting business decisions a person can make. When you decide to enter an industry where 60% of new enterprises close within the first year, you better be damn sure you know what you’re doing, not just in the kitchen but with the ol’ bean counters too! So here at Hirl, we serve food that you could easily find at Denny’s but with an exotic twist that allows us to mark up the average price of a meal to $34. In the mood for two pieces of toast, a couple of eggs over easy, and several strips of bacon? Then you’ll treasure our open-faced brioche toast with imported ricotta and handmade boysenberry jam, cage-free fried eggs with a dollop of lacto fermented hot sauce, and our signature Bahn Mi pan-fried pork belly. It’s unnecessarily complicated food fit for an 18th-century European monarch or any modern urban dweller uncomfortable making eye contact with poor people.

And don’t forget our signature $8 to-go mason jar of gourmet coffee! Bring it back and you’ll get a $1 rebate for sustaining the sustainability of our sustainable program. On your first visit to Hirl, you’ll probably notice that we don’t serve drinks in plastic bottles or aluminum cans. Unfortunately, these recyclables were attracting residents who collected them en masse in order to supplement their income. Life is far too short to spend your days trudging in the rat race. But with our green viability plan, we simultaneously stay true to our canning roots while also gently nudging the natives away from their relentless focus on capitalism.

OUR PHILOSOPHY
Hirl subscribes to the doctrine that nothing is more important than tradition… the tradition of Christopher Columbus, the original gentrifier. Let’s be honest: Who would you rather have sitting at the table next to you? The 102-year-old woman whose father built the very first house on this block thanks to a Spanish land grant? The elderly Japanese-American widower whose home was “bought” by his neighbors during World War II and returned to him after his release from the Manzanar internment camp? Or the actress who plays Sally Draper on Mad Men? Don’t look directly at her! Keep your cool, man. Dammit, I said don’t look at her! God, you’re such a fucking dork sometimes.

We strive for absolute guest satisfaction. There is nothing more important to us than serving our clientele of hip creative types in search of the authenticity that can only come from eating seared polenta cake next door to a wine and cheese shoppe that used to be a piñata store. Since the only hardship they face is the crushing anxiety that their ex-girlfriend will eventually change her Netflix password, we make sure to forge the ultimate rugged dining experience: Baristas who won’t reveal our almond milk-only policy until you verbally go through every single variety we don’t carry. Cramped tables and chairs that were repurposed from scavenged school desks culled out the dumpsters of nearby middle schools. Ridiculously long lines that, if they aren’t already blocking the path for stroller-pushing mothers, are artificially elongated by our unnecessary Line Up™ iPad system. Here at Hirl, you’ll feel right at home… if you pretend your home is a century-old Mexican and Central American neighborhood teeming with the overlooked history of Los Angeles’s working class instead of the suburb you grew up in 20 miles east of Berkeley.

OUR FUTURE
From our humble beginnings selling jam to white people with way too much disposable income, to convincing those same diners that poached quail eggs is a totally normal thing to consume, Hirl has never been about getting bogged down in stasis. When we moved into this barrio, the rent was cheap and affordable for anyone, whether you were raising a family on a minimum-wage income or trying to pass off fruit preservatives as a whimsical luxury good. And although our quirky foodstuff, like the small pox-infected blankets at Fort Pitt, has eliminated most of the generations of families who grew up in this neighborhood, we at Hirl will never forget that our main goal is to serve food that locals have zero interest in eating, even when the demographics of said locals change.

Which is why we’re pleased to announce that in 2015, our revamped menu will be anchored by our lunch special: four tacos and a soda for only $5.


http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/...people-who-actually-live-in-this-neighborhood
 
snip ...

A cause of the gentrification in London can be traced back to Thatchers deregulation of the City ( the "Big Bang") in 80s. Up until then London was losing population. The City turned London into a centre for casino capitalism. This did little for the average Londoner but made London sexy again for the financial class. Also London had a no questions asked policy for the new uber rich like Russian Oligarchs. Who found they liked London. Safe secure with access to lawyers etc. Unlike the chaotic mess they made of there own country.

Yes - who wants London houses just to be somewhere for rich foreigners to park their money?

I think the increase of London population in the 80s was partly due to Thatcher trying to close the North down. It was grim up north - no jobs anywhere.
I'm of that 'on-yer-bike' generation - London seemed to be full of us then scottish, welsh, geordies, scousers, mancs, yorkshiremen, brummies - It was a while before I met any born and bred londoners. I'm one of the lucky ones who did ok, and stayed.
 
I think it's more than that. I think it was a key element to the gentrification of Brixton.

Its highly-reviewed restaurants and quirky stores featured VERY prominently in the publicity material of every upmarket new build in Brixton and played a big part in calming the nerves of hesitant investors and reassuring them that it was a safe and cool place to place. I don't think it was coincidental that the development mock ups and publicity shots showed a vastly disproportionate amount of white people strolling through the happy clappy village and along Coldharbour Lane.

Prior to the Village's gentrification, Brixton rarely got positive press. The Village changed that and open the floodgates.

So kind of a pump-primer for the last (and ongoing) wave of gentrification, then, reassuring both investors and potential incomers that they and their money were safe.
 
i think that if you're a social housing tenant in london the assumption that they have to rehouse you (let alone rehouse you locally) if they redevelop your block is increasing a flawed one. we need to look at the heygate as the model for modern london social housing redevelopment. if they decide to redevelop the barrier block, it WILL be to knock it down and build luxury flats on it and there WILL be no space for the current tenants. reading between the lines, it is clear that there is no place for social housing tenants or indeed social housing in the london borough of lambeth.

This is why those of us who live on Cressingham Gardens are so determined to resist options 4 and 5 of Lambeth's proposed "development plan" for the estate - it'll mean decanting, with no "right of return", all so the council can effectively socially-cleanse another hundred households of povs from the borough (because let's face it: Increasingly "rehoming" of this type is out-of-borough, if not out-of-region!).
 
So what do you think should have been done about the Village specifically, and by whom?

There's nothing to be done. Any social damage caused can't be reversed, and both the local authority and the developer/owner of the Village will have known that. Lambeth, in cahoots with whoever will have them, have decided to do a spot of demographic engineering. They're not the first inner London local authority to do so, and they won't be the last. They've decided to ride the wave of the up-and-comers, rather than continuing to paddle in the rockpool of majority working-class wards.
 
When someone looks to buy they typically look at the areas that they can afford to live in and then pick their favourite. People I know who are in the same position as I was a few years ago are now looking (because of price rises) in Streatham, Mitcham and Colliers Wood. 10 years ago young professionals would have been able to have afforded Fulham, 5 years ago Clapham.

The problem is that in an ever increasing market when people move out of London to, for example, raise a family, they typically hold onto their London flat and rent it out. That causes prices to increase as the supply declines.

There should be a rapid and urgent building of council houses for all types of people – funded by heavy taxes on buy to lets.

It'll never happen - neither a heavy tax on buy-to-let (with nearly half of the House of Commons involved in it), or a true mass social housing building programme (because of the deflating effect on the house price bubble, which is currently still propping up an otherwise not-very-active economy).
 
Today's McSweeney's essay has a certain resonance, and a few salty LOLz:




WE PROVIDE MEALS THAT ARE COMPLETELY UNAFFORDABLE AND UNAPPEALING TO PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY LIVE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

BY PABLO GOLDSTEIN

When we founded Hirl five years ago as a locally owned cannery in the cramped confines of a former pupusería, we never dreamed that our modest storefront would change the world. What was originally established as a creative collective intended to vertically integrate both the production and sales of artisanally crafted jams, soon morphed into a bustling, award-winning restaurant that brings in food aficionados from across the world. But despite all our accolades during these whirlwind years, Hirl has managed to stay true to the two tenets of our business:

Using only the freshest, naturally-occurring ingredients on Mother Gaia, and providing meals that are completely unaffordable and unappealing to people who actually live in this neighborhood.

OUR MISSION
Opening a restaurant is one of the most daunting business decisions a person can make. When you decide to enter an industry where 60% of new enterprises close within the first year, you better be damn sure you know what you’re doing, not just in the kitchen but with the ol’ bean counters too! So here at Hirl, we serve food that you could easily find at Denny’s but with an exotic twist that allows us to mark up the average price of a meal to $34. In the mood for two pieces of toast, a couple of eggs over easy, and several strips of bacon? Then you’ll treasure our open-faced brioche toast with imported ricotta and handmade boysenberry jam, cage-free fried eggs with a dollop of lacto fermented hot sauce, and our signature Bahn Mi pan-fried pork belly. It’s unnecessarily complicated food fit for an 18th-century European monarch or any modern urban dweller uncomfortable making eye contact with poor people.

And don’t forget our signature $8 to-go mason jar of gourmet coffee! Bring it back and you’ll get a $1 rebate for sustaining the sustainability of our sustainable program. On your first visit to Hirl, you’ll probably notice that we don’t serve drinks in plastic bottles or aluminum cans. Unfortunately, these recyclables were attracting residents who collected them en masse in order to supplement their income. Life is far too short to spend your days trudging in the rat race. But with our green viability plan, we simultaneously stay true to our canning roots while also gently nudging the natives away from their relentless focus on capitalism.

OUR PHILOSOPHY
Hirl subscribes to the doctrine that nothing is more important than tradition… the tradition of Christopher Columbus, the original gentrifier. Let’s be honest: Who would you rather have sitting at the table next to you? The 102-year-old woman whose father built the very first house on this block thanks to a Spanish land grant? The elderly Japanese-American widower whose home was “bought” by his neighbors during World War II and returned to him after his release from the Manzanar internment camp? Or the actress who plays Sally Draper on Mad Men? Don’t look directly at her! Keep your cool, man. Dammit, I said don’t look at her! God, you’re such a fucking dork sometimes.

We strive for absolute guest satisfaction. There is nothing more important to us than serving our clientele of hip creative types in search of the authenticity that can only come from eating seared polenta cake next door to a wine and cheese shoppe that used to be a piñata store. Since the only hardship they face is the crushing anxiety that their ex-girlfriend will eventually change her Netflix password, we make sure to forge the ultimate rugged dining experience: Baristas who won’t reveal our almond milk-only policy until you verbally go through every single variety we don’t carry. Cramped tables and chairs that were repurposed from scavenged school desks culled out the dumpsters of nearby middle schools. Ridiculously long lines that, if they aren’t already blocking the path for stroller-pushing mothers, are artificially elongated by our unnecessary Line Up™ iPad system. Here at Hirl, you’ll feel right at home… if you pretend your home is a century-old Mexican and Central American neighborhood teeming with the overlooked history of Los Angeles’s working class instead of the suburb you grew up in 20 miles east of Berkeley.

OUR FUTURE
From our humble beginnings selling jam to white people with way too much disposable income, to convincing those same diners that poached quail eggs is a totally normal thing to consume, Hirl has never been about getting bogged down in stasis. When we moved into this barrio, the rent was cheap and affordable for anyone, whether you were raising a family on a minimum-wage income or trying to pass off fruit preservatives as a whimsical luxury good. And although our quirky foodstuff, like the small pox-infected blankets at Fort Pitt, has eliminated most of the generations of families who grew up in this neighborhood, we at Hirl will never forget that our main goal is to serve food that locals have zero interest in eating, even when the demographics of said locals change.

Which is why we’re pleased to announce that in 2015, our revamped menu will be anchored by our lunch special: four tacos and a soda for only $5.


http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/...people-who-actually-live-in-this-neighborhood

That article makes me want to go to the USA just to shit on the floor of that emporium.
 
The problem is that in an ever increasing market when people move out of London to, for example, raise a family, they typically hold onto their London flat and rent it out. That causes prices to increase as the supply declines.

This has/is happening in our street. Not good.
 
There's nothing to be done. Any social damage caused can't be reversed, and both the local authority and the developer/owner of the Village will have known that. Lambeth, in cahoots with whoever will have them, have decided to do a spot of demographic engineering. They're not the first inner London local authority to do so, and they won't be the last. They've decided to ride the wave of the up-and-comers, rather than continuing to paddle in the rockpool of majority working-class wards.

Lambeth's role in this is exaggerated. Bigger forces are also at play.
 
Lambeth's role in this is exaggerated. Bigger forces are also at play.

I realise it's the case that there's a fair bit of pressure and influence being exerted from central government, both through the likes of Pickles, and due to grant cuts, but it still rankles that we have officers and councillors who're more than happy to go with the flow, especially if it looks like it might benefit them.
 
Maybe it is a bit naive of me to suggest that instead of reflexively shunning BV establishments, why not approach them directly and voice your concerns? The change has happened whether we like it or not. Even if a few of the establishments take on board what you've said, it is a positive result.
 
My parents place is an LA transfer to RSL and it's interesting how the RSL are making more things the responsibility of the tenants. Hilariously they tried to charge my parents a service charge for communal space - which hadn't happened for the last 35 years. I suggested my mum sent them a bill for 35 years of gardening.

In an ideal world social housing should be for whoever wants it and for a life time, however as demand has become high, the RSL/LA are rethinking their models - if this means new time limited tenancies so that more people have the chance of benefiting from a low rent for a period in their life until they have set them self up, then so be it. I prefer this to the "affordable rents" options.

And being guaranteed somewhere to live over a long period through some social housing provider is better than the uncertainty of being in private rented.

I do not understand your argument. You say that your parents have lived in social housing for 35 years. Then you agree with time limited tenancies until people "have set them self up". When exactly will your parents being moving on? According to your argument they have benefited from 35 years of low rent. Plenty of time to "set them self up".

If you think time limited tenancies are the best that can be done as this is not an ideal world why do you criticise your parents RSL for trying to increase there income by new service charges?

Time limited tenancies and affordable rent regime go together.

Council tenants have struggled hard to keep secure tenancies. What is needed is a housebuilding programme. All the money that went into "quantitative easing" ( which went into repairing banks balance sheets ) could have been used to build Council housing.
 
Maybe it is a bit naive of me to suggest that instead of reflexively shunning BV establishments, why not approach them directly and voice your concerns? The change has happened whether we like it or not. Even if a few of the establishments take on board what you've said, it is a positive result.
What do you suggest should be said to them and why do you think they would be interested given that they all appear to be doing rather well as things are?
 
The problem is that in an ever increasing market when people move out of London to, for example, raise a family, they typically hold onto their London flat and rent it out. That causes prices to increase as the supply declines.

There should be a rapid and urgent building of council houses for all types of people – funded by heavy taxes on buy to lets.

I agree this is happening.

The problem for the Labour party is that some of its supporters have buy to let properties. My friend in North London kept her old flat on when she bought a house nearby. She has a buy to let mortgage on her old flat. She regard its as her pension. As pension funds are so crap.

She is active Labour party supporter. Involved in campaign work around health. ie she is not just out for a fast buck.

When I mentioned to her Ed Milibands recent proposals to reform private rented sector she went off one like some tory. How his (imo mild proposals) would destroy private renting etc. And said her friends agreed with her. I was somewhat surprised as she is Labour party supporter. Also realized that her friends also did the same as her and kept old flats on as buy to let when they moved.
 
I agree this is happening.

The problem for the Labour party is that some of its supporters have buy to let properties. My friend in North London kept her old flat on when she bought a house nearby. She has a buy to let mortgage on her old flat. She regard its as her pension. As pension funds are so crap.

She is active Labour party supporter. Involved in campaign work around health. ie she is not just out for a fast buck.

When I mentioned to her Ed Milibands recent proposals to reform private rented sector she went off one like some tory. How his (imo mild proposals) would destroy private renting etc. And said her friends agreed with her. I was somewhat surprised as she is Labour party supporter. Also realized that her friends also did the same as her and kept old flats on as buy to let when they moved.

I've met a few lefties who have a buy to let - really surprised me!
 
Yes - who wants London houses just to be somewhere for rich foreigners to park their money?

I think the increase of London population in the 80s was partly due to Thatcher trying to close the North down. It was grim up north - no jobs anywhere.
I'm of that 'on-yer-bike' generation - London seemed to be full of us then scottish, welsh, geordies, scousers, mancs, yorkshiremen, brummies - It was a while before I met any born and bred londoners. I'm one of the lucky ones who did ok, and stayed.

I remember meeting Northerners in London in 80s. It was so bad up North that they came to London. Thatcher destroyed the North.
 
I do not understand your argument. You say that your parents have lived in social housing for 35 years. Then you agree with time limited tenancies until people "have set them self up". When exactly will your parents being moving on? According to your argument they have benefited from 35 years of low rent. Plenty of time to "set them self up".

If you think time limited tenancies are the best that can be done as this is not an ideal world why do you criticise your parents RSL for trying to increase there income by new service charges?

Time limited tenancies and affordable rent regime go together.

Council tenants have struggled hard to keep secure tenancies. What is needed is a housebuilding programme. All the money that went into "quantitative easing" ( which went into repairing banks balance sheets ) could have been used to build Council housing.

I suggested that I think social housing should be for life and for whoever wants it. You mention council housing building which would be great but this is not happening so what to do?

My parents are now financially in the best position they've ever been. However my dad's dementia is getting worst so moving him would not be a good idea. I'm sure with time limited tenancies, there would be some reasonable argument to why people can't move such as illness, disability, kids still at school.

Regarding the RSL's service charge, it was introduced at a rate that applied to a tower block not a hall way in a house. My parents also got charged for the tree that had to be removed because it's roots were too near the drains - the tree was there when they were moved into the house and it's in the neighbour's garden.
 
Interested in how high London population was in 1939. Then started to gradually drop. Wonder why this was? Loss of Empire after WW2? Leading to London no longer being a centre of Empire?
From what I understand the city was a bomb site after the war nothing to stay for so people left.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom