SpamMisery
Pretty comfortable here right under your skin
And were at the "name calling" stage
Wait. So you're saying that when an area becomes fashionable and gets featured in trendy mags, in-flight publications and the international media as a must-see destination, it has no impact on house prices?
Not another posh Burger bar.Go fuck some livestock.
Is Brixton the new Earl's Court?
That's nice. But seeing as Brixton has been widely featured in London, national and international media, what is your point?I said that I doubt alleged 'promotion' in a smattering of publications has much or any impact.
Not sure that is the case at all, as far as people coming to Brixton is concerned anyway. Up until 6-8 years ago, a very wide swathe of people wouldn't come to Brixton at all, due to the reputation the place had among those who didn't know it first-hand and the depiction it got in the media. So if anything, a far more varied range of social groups visit Brixton now than they did 10 years ago, IMO at least.
I said that I doubt alleged 'promotion' in a smattering of publications has much or any impact.
That's nice. But seeing as Brixton has been widely featured in London, national and international media, what is your point?
Stockwell has a bigger population (14,777) than East Dulwich (12,321), Dalston (10,722) and Balham (14,751). Camberwell is only marginally bigger (15,032). Is there a point to your increasingly unfocussed ramblings?Stockwell is too small to compare with Brixton, East Dulwich, Dalston, Peckham, Camberwell, Balham, Clapham, Shoreditch, Chiswick etc.
i thoght of Brixton fondly this week after a visit to a small town up north, where if you order anything but chicken tikka massalla from the menu they look at you as if you are mad, where one bloke i met called indian food "paki food", and the local fake American dinner is seen as the height of experiencing world cuisine.
I do so hate the word 'foodie'
It's kneejerk to describe the tourists who'll read this piece as 'Champagne quaffing foodie globe trotting travellers' - anyone who's been say, to New York for a few days to sample the nightlife could be described as that. Frankly if they've hacked economy for 23 hours to come to Brixton I'll give them a bloody medal.
So who is the extensive guide to NYC on this site aimed at?
...
I don't know, I don't do it as much anymore. I think the 37 bus there and back might set you back some £$ though.
Great description!TBF, Streatham has always been more of a church-going maiden aunt, than an ugly sister.
I kind of see your point, but (and I know you and I have had this conversation before) I really struggle with the vitriol. Apart from the fact you don't persuade anyone of anything by shouting at them, I think a good/interesting conversation often gets lost in here because everyone retreats to entrenched positions and abuse. There has to be a way where mixed communities can thrive alongside one another? I don't know what that is (I'm no specialist in urban development) but I'd love to have a conversation about it. Never seems possible here- disappointingly as there are real experts on here, and people with interesting perspectives- because it instantly dissolves into sneering and a slanging match.Perhaps, like me, he's got good reason to be "angry" when he lives in local authority social housing that his local authority has already shown has very little security any more - a local authority some of whose Labour councillors have praised the demographic change gentrification is causing, and who support "regeneration" of council estates on the most flimsy of excuses.
Let me be blunt. If you live in local authority social housing in any area where the authority has pretensions toward "raising" the demographic bottom line, there's plenty to be angry about.
Let me get this straight. Anyone who has ever travelled abroad by air to visit another country is a cunt in your book?Whatever you call them (I quite like "cunts") Brixton was more interesting when they were scared to come down here.
Just listen to yourself. What the fuck does people talking about phones got to do with this debate? Explain yourself please.Meanwhile this is a site that arguably promotes Brixton in a similar way, with just a little bit of class & economic distance between its focus and the article's. Plus a site that I think loses some of those 'affordable' credentials when evangelising £600 mobile phones on rotation, and whatever else, but has a problem with, what, cocktails and popular boho eateries because they're symbols of a pattern that may play out negatively in your own lives.
So, you've brought up expensive mobile phones but drew a bit of a blank there, so now you're bringing up an article I wrote on another site in another cheap attempt to have a pop at me. If you bothered to read the article, I pointed out that the cocktails are "priced very much at nu-Brixton market rates (£8.50/£9 a go)." That's not a compliment, you know, not that it's got anything to do with what 'urban' supposedly thinks, or the topic under discussion.I'm not even clear where Urban draws its own line.
Like this, from the thread on popup restaurants: In photos: Barrio Brixton, a Latin-themed restaurant/bar opens in Acre Lane, Brixton
So it's what, fine to give that and its £9 cocktails publicity as long as it's local publicity for local people? I guess Australian IPs are blocked. Or is it just because they're down-to-earth £9 cocktails and not the excesses of a champagne bar - is that where the bar is set?
A big chunk of this place is, or certainly historically has been, an uncritical celebration of technology and technology consumerism. That's so self-evident that it doesn't really need demonstrating, but I can if you like?Just listen to yourself. What the fuck does people talking about phones got to do with this debate? Explain yourself please.
My phone costs £260, by the way. Is that OK with you? What does that entitle me to talk about?
Drawn a blank in the six minutes between your posts? What is this, internet High Noon?So, you've brought up expensive mobile phones but drew a bit of a blank there, so now you're bringing up an article I wrote on another site in another cheap attempt to have a pop at me. If you bothered to read it the article, I pointed out that the cocktails are "priced very much at nu-Brixton market rates (£8.50/£9 a go)." That's not a compliment.
An 'uncritical celebration'? Nope, that's a big fat lie right there.A big chunk of this place is, or certainly historically has been, an uncritical celebration of technology and technology consumerism.
Ah, the ad hominem approach, again, all delivered from that comfort blanket of anonymity.Now they are different things. Gentrification is not simple consumerism, and I'm sure you have a valid complaint about that. But this expression of it seems to be inconsistent and contradictory. If you're having a go at anyone it's apparently people in much the same boat that spend their money slightly differently. That's basically barking at your own tail.
Is it not? Who else can afford a £629 phone?Is an expensive mobile phone the exclusive preserve of the wealthy - no.
What are you complaining about in the OP? Tourism? Expensive things? People with money? The increasingly middle class, consumerist nature of Brixton? All of that has to do with wealth and consumerism, but it comes in many flavours.So what's the fuck has any of this got to do with tourism, gentrification and Brixton? Why are you even bringing it up?
What does this even mean?Ah, the ad hominem approach, again, all delivered from that comfort blanket of anonymity.
That's a beautifully self-contained bit of hypocrisy. Perhaps you can evidence it?It seems this kind of disruptive, personalised sniping is just about all your capable of these days. Sad, really.
I've really no idea what you're on about, who has bought this £629 phone or what any of it has to do with this Brixton or this discussion.Is it not? Who else can afford a £629 phone?