whereas you try to deny that it has to be labourist while remaining a member of the labour party?The history of attempts from within the labour movement to think beyond Labourist assumptions (not just in Labour but from the May Day Manifesto, to CP, IWC, Socialist Register, Socialist Movement, etc etc.) is very rich and rewarding.
Depressing that the ultra-left are totally complicit with the Labour right in insisting that any involvement in, or positive consideration the possibilities of, Labour has to be on "Labourist" terms.
the questions will recurr if not for Labour lefts then for a new workers party - or else the left will stay fucked.
you're in a deep rut which has been carved out over the past fucking hundred years.the questions will recurr if not for Labour lefts then for a new workers party - or else the left will stay fucked.
The dominance of the labour party over the wider labour movement and oppositional politics isn't imagined though. It's real. And standing in isolation bemoaning it isn't going to change that.you're in a deep rut which has been carved out over the past fucking hundred years.
you're still in a deep rut which has been carved out for decades. and it's getting increasingly dull. as a member of the labour party you're part of the problem.The dominance of the labour party over the wider labour movement and oppositional politics isn't imagined though. It's real. And standing in isolation bemoaning it isn't going to change that.
The only way to change labours dominance is to join labour and get other people to vote and join labour according to articul8.you're still in a deep rut which has been carved out for decades. and it's getting increasingly dull. as a member of the labour party you're part of the problem.
sounds a bit like the auld militant to me. only without the militancy.The only way to change labours dominance is to join labour and get other people to vote and join labour according to articul8.
Gramsci.
/quote]
Face+ palm