lights.out.london
Black Flag
Were any rich actually bashed?
Geri said:Oh dear, some muppet has gone and booked his coach for the wrong day!
This is why you should never let men do anything without checking it for them first.
october_lost said:Good post
Attica said:
I am.
Funnily enough I am saying these things as somebody who is not promoting the event cos I live in a different part of the country a long long way away from where it is taking place...
Your critique is not so much critique - more jumbled mess - you said "We have rich and poor because we have class-divided society. To attempt to ameliorate that situation without addressing the cause of that situation is doomed to failure." But you could quite easily say that 'we have class divided society because we have rich and poor' which to me makes more sense cos I am looking up from below at the class structure around and above me.
You are not at all clear, and you are full of wishful thinking...
GuruYoghourt said:Over the years, on boards like these, I have met many people like you. Sophists. Some clever. Some not so clever. Some very stupid. Some even more stupid than you. But what I've learned is that you can never win an argument with a truly stupid person. All you can do is offer them a cure. In your case I prescribe a cursory study of human history with specific reference to the origins of private property not as a fact of society, but rather as the basis of society. Should you grasp that then you will no longer place the cart before the horse.
Dillinger4 said:Ahh. The man with all the answers.
Please, Educate us all.
GuruYoghourt said:I only have 73% of the answers, I'm afraid.
None of which I've done. Don't blame me if YOU feel inadequate.Dillinger4 said:Thats not a high enough percentage for you to pass judgment, proscribe cures and pretend like you actually have a claim to know everything.
Dillinger4 said:Thats not a high enough percentage for you to pass judgment, proscribe cures and pretend like you actually have a claim to know everything.
joer90 said:your right we need to get rid of capitalism thanks for stateing the odvious you twat! who runs capitalism? who makes the laws? owns the factorys? locks us up?................. the rich thats who thats why were having a pop at them whats your answer to capitalism? what you guna do about it? fuck all i suspect.....................
joer90 said:your right we need to get rid of capitalism thanks for stateing the odvious you twat! who runs capitalism? who makes the laws? owns the factorys? locks us up?................. the rich thats who thats why were having a pop at them whats your answer to capitalism? what you guna do about it? fuck all i suspect.....................
Dillinger4 said:It seems that I have jumped in without really reading any of the thread.
I only posted because GY comes across as an arrogant moron.
GuruYoghourt said:Well, if you bother to read what I've written I'm sure that you'll retract the 'moron' bit. As for being arrogant, thanks very much.
GuruYoghourt said:A bunch of so-called anarchists staging a risible theatrical performance is no threat whatsoever to the ruling class.
You see, you need to understand how flexible, adaptable and capable of absorbing dissent capitalism is. Anarchists rioting outside the World Trade Centre? No threat. Aeroplanes aimed at buildings? Not a problem. The only possible threat to the status quo is the working-class understanding why capitalism can never work in their interests, and why they must overthrow it and replace it with a classless, stateless, moneyless society based on common ownership and democratic control of the means of production.
When the working-class have that understanding, and rise up to end capitalism, not reform it with some ludicrous leftist state-capitalist dictatorship, then, and only then, will the ruling class have something to worry about.
That's not anarchism, that's a sinister situationist vanguard, innitGuruYoghourt said:Hey! Who's an aggressive chappie? I'll tell you what, kid. A bunch of so-called anarchists staging a risible theatrical performance is no threat whatsoever to the ruling class. In fact, if people like that didn't exist the ruling class would employ people to stage such displays, just to sidetrack those who are actually concerned about effecting meaningful change.
Dillinger4 said:Nah. The more I read, the more it seems like you have nothing to say. Oh and it wasn't a compliment, you don't seem to have much to be arrogant about.
lightsoutlondon said:<snip>
No need to talk down to him. He can cope with the arguments. No need to name call.
Dillinger4 said:Only to second this:
*leaves thread*
GuruYoghourt said:Over the years, on boards like these, I have met many people like you. Sophists. Some clever. Some not so clever. Some very stupid. Some even more stupid than you. But what I've learned is that you can never win an argument with a truly stupid person. All you can do is offer them a cure. In your case I prescribe a cursory study of human history with specific reference to the origins of private property not as a fact of society, but rather as the basis of society. Should you grasp that then you will no longer place the cart before the horse.
GuruYoghourt said:Hey! Who's an aggressive chappie? I'll tell you what, kid. A bunch of so-called anarchists staging a risible theatrical performance is no threat whatsoever to the ruling class. In fact, if people like that didn't exist the ruling class would employ people to stage such displays, just to sidetrack those who are actually concerned about effecting meaningful change.
You see, you need to understand how flexible, adaptable and capable of absorbing dissent capitalism is. Anarchists rioting outside the World Trade Centre? No threat. Aeroplanes aimed at buildings? Not a problem. The only possible threat to the status quo is the working-class understanding why capitalism can never work in their interests, and why they must overthrow it and replace it with a classless, stateless, moneyless society based on common ownership and democratic control of the means of production. When the working-class have that understanding, and rise up to end capitalism, not reform it with some ludicrous leftist state-capitalist dictatorship, then, and only then, will the ruling class have something to worry about. That's what I work for. And you're in the way.
Why should today's anarchists listen to anything that the antisemitic, grotesquely chauvinist, 19th Century bigotted twat called Pierre-Joseph Proudhon had to say?Attica said:
You stupid twat.
'Property is theft' is the famous slogan from the 19th century and we aim to abolish commodities my friend (but not things or the ability to make them).
Attica said:
You stupid twat.
'Property is theft' is the famous slogan from the 19th century and we aim to abolish commodities my friend (but not things or the ability to make them). Serious revolution. A complete change in perception as well in the way capitalist society is run.
I have learned that you are a truly arrogant and stupid person and no, you will never win the argument cos you do not know it all, and you have only a one sided argument. Grow up.
How old are you? Have you got your degree yet?
invisibleplanet said:Why should today's anarchists listen to anything that the antisemitic, grotesquely chauvinist, 19th Century bigot known as Proudhon had to say?
GuruYoghourt said:I'm quite probably old enough to be your father, although if I was I'd have drowned you at birth, most likely. You're spouting nonsense. You plan to bring about a revolution that's going to change the way capitalist society is run? And you're going to do it by killing people. That's not a revolution, it's reform. You are utterly confused. You're going to abolish commodities. But they'll still be able to be made. Yeah!
You might think that I am arrogant and stupid, and I can see why you might think that. It's because that is precisely what you are. I've seen some very sloppy thinking over the years, but you could win prizes.
invisibleplanet said:Why should today's anarchists listen to anything that the antisemitic, grotesquely chauvinist, 19th Century bigotted twat called Pierre-Joseph Proudhon had to say?