If you're into jaw-dropping technical skill, this is what technical guitar playing looks like these days:
Yeah, it's kinda like bands that previously dismissed as boring/not remotely interested in that eventually became essential as got older... one of the things about the aging process is barriers coming down in terms of music likesAh, you need the 'Bands who are criminally underrated but who can play really well' thread, then
I've added bands rather than replaced them, so I still listen to music I did aged 12, 18, etc but also stuff I've heard recently even if that stuff is 20 years old, usually edmYeah, it's kinda like bands that previously dismissed as boring/not remotely interested in that eventually became essential as got older... one of the things about the aging process is barriers coming down in terms of music likes
Yet particular Hendrix recordings of, e.g. All Along the Watchtower, or Voodoo Chile, are outstanding. Improvisational music runs the risk of sometimes being a bit naff, occasionally transcendent.Yeah I agree with this. Hendrix was good of course but not absolute top level like Jeff Beck or even Mark Knopfler or John Mayer. And everyone is tapping these days so Van Halen is a much more important figure. Not that you will ever catch me listening to Van Halen, I fucking hate it and I'd rather listen to Hendrix x1 million.
Thread To be honest its really odd seeing U75 fetishise musicality/the craft of making music. Whatever happened to artistry and sound that's just interesting in its own right? Whatever happened to basic music that just slaps? All you old punks are betraying your younger selves. These days there are so many amazing young guitarists (for example) on social media who put Hendrix or pretty much any one of these old guys to shame. Tapping, slapping, percussing, twiddling, math-rock-chording all with amazing intonation and somehow astonishingly all at once. But I want to see the return of some proper grot. And I'm a fucking prog rock fan.
Aye, Madness is a band will still happily listen to. Even Howard Jones occasionally gets a spin!I've added bands rather than replaced them, so I still listen to music I did aged 12, 18, etc but also stuff I've heard recently even if that stuff is 20 years old, usually edm
Fair enough.Well, they epitomised the wave of massively popular hair metal of the time, were very MTV friendly and put on a good show. Their music wasn’t for everyone sure. It I totally get why they were/are popular.
This version of Maggot Brain is just astonishing, even if the guitars are a bit low in the mix. Fretwank, yes, but it works because it builds emotionally and because of the contrast with the 4 chords in the background:Some astounding guitar work from Eddie Hazel in early Funkadelic
Yep to that. Even if you strip away the social context around Hendrix - counter culture, blues player helping create a new rock music etc - some of which was a bit dodgy anyway - he gets it on 'the music'. But 'the music' isn't something to do with speed or other technical stuff, it's about the subtleties he created, particularly the way he combined rhythm and lead parts. It was about creating songs, not vehicles for showing off.Yeah I agree with this. Hendrix was good of course but not absolute top level like Jeff Beck or even Mark Knopfler or John Mayer. And everyone is tapping these days so Van Halen is a much more important figure. Not that you will ever catch me listening to Van Halen, I fucking hate it and I'd rather listen to Hendrix x1 million.
I love the guitar/bass/drums band set up since everyone has to work hard and play inventively to maintain a full sound - Hendrix, Pete Townshend and Cream-era Clapton were great at that. Others like Jimmy Page when playing live exposed how much he relied on studio overdubs. Having too many players makes a band quite unwieldy and inflexible but, with a trio, you develop a musical empathy with band mates so you can turn on a sixpence.Yep to that. Even if you strip away the social context around Hendrix - counter culture, blues player helping create a new rock music etc - some of which was a bit dodgy anyway - he gets it on 'the music'. But 'the music' isn't something to do with speed or other technical stuff, it's about the subtleties he created, particularly the way he combined rhythm and lead parts. It was about creating songs, not vehicles for showing off.
I thought Bowie sounded great with pretty much all his producers, especially Brian Eno; also Gus Dudgeon, Ken Scott, etc,David Byrne wrote a book in which he talked about venues and sound and how some venues better suit some music and sound. There are some bands who you don't get until you see them live and in the right venue for them . However you've hit on something with production as there are some bands who just wouldn't sound the same with another producer ie Joy Division and Martin Hannett, the Talking Heads /Eno period,TalkTalk and Freise-Green, Visconti/Bowie, Martin/Beatles etc
Was Morrissey who used to rave about them. One of his few positives.I don't understand this thread. I absolutely love the New York dolls. Often have them blasting out at home. What's not to like?
i found a lot of good music following tips from Morrissey over the years.Was Morrissey who used to rave about them. One of his few positives.
Not sure. McLaren had something to do with them possibly?Didn't Morrissey get them back together so that they went on tour and made a whole new album, before they all started dying?
McClaren's involvement was in the mid 70s & after, he decided to rip them off. Morrisey got them back together in 2004 for the Meltdown Festival, and they stayed together for a bit - till 2011.Not sure. McLaren had something to do with them possibly?
Their first album led to discovering the genius of Todd Rundgren, another musician had dismissed in younger years.
I love the guitar/bass/drums band set up since everyone has to work hard and play inventively to maintain a full sound - Hendrix, Pete Townshend and Cream-era Clapton were great at that. Others like Jimmy Page when playing live exposed how much he relied on studio overdubs. Having too many players makes a band quite unwieldy and inflexible but, with a trio, you develop a musical empathy with band mates so you can turn on a sixpence.
Something/Anything is an amazing albumNot sure. McLaren had something to do with them possibly?
Their first album led to discovering the genius of Todd Rundgren, another musician had dismissed in younger years.
Didn't Morrissey get them back together so that they went on tour and made a whole new album, before they all started dying?
I saw the Slits aroung 1977/1978. They were really poor and only got a couple of songs in before they started arguing with each other and all stormed off the stage. Troopers they were not. It proper put me off them.the slits.
If you're into jaw-dropping technical skill, this is what technical guitar playing looks like these days: