Austin Powers: crap/ not crap?

[T & P]

I’d imagine for many this might seem on the surface an open and shut case. Undoubtedly it’s not exactly sophisticated comedy, and like most other gag-a-minute films of the genre, a sizeable percentage of the jokes fall flat.

But the films (first two at least) are also very funny at places, and more importantly for me, any film or film franchise that produces memorable and enduring characters and quotable catchphrases deserves a lot of recognition. So definitely not crap for me. Convince me otherwise.

 

[T & P]

As an aside thought? Whatever happened to Mike Myers’s acting career? Did he have some kind of breakdown and decided to quit? The Shrek films were phenomenally successful but after them he almost completely quit acting for 6-8 years solid?

 

[farmerbarleymow]

Fucking awful shit.

 

[platinumsage]

Up there with a whole lot of other stuff just behind Mrs Brown's Boys.

 

[platinumsage]

As an aside thought? Whatever happened to Mike Myers’s acting career? Did he have some kind of breakdown and decided to quit? The Shrek films were phenomenally successful but after them he almost completely quit acting for 6-8 years solid?

Sued for $30 million for breaking a contract, did a kiddies film with sex jokes that flopped, and was "difficult" to work with: www.narcity.com/gossip/ca/mike-myers-where-is-he-now-and-why-isnt-he-making-movies

 

[Idris2002]

It's one of those things - you want to give it a chance, you want it to be good, but. . . it's not.

 

[Mrs Miggins]

It's one of those things - you want to give it a chance, you want it to be good, but. . . it's not.

This.
I remember sitting down to watch it after "everyone" had gone on about how hilarious it is. And it's really not.

 

[Idris2002]

The thing was, the basic concept was sound, and it could have worked. . .

I mean, this is funny:

Spoiler

 

[T & P]

Mini Me, though. And Sharks with Freaking Lasers.

 

[kabbes]

It had scenes that I found genuinely hilarious as a 20 year old. I’ve not watched it since

 

[weltweit]

Quite amusing, amusing enough to watch, sometimes cringey - but I think supposed to be.

 

[T & P]

I think I might have been told in here (likely as not by Reno ) that it’s not actually the case, but I remember reading somewhere that the Austin Power films’ relentless mocking of many outdated James Bond film cliches (such as over elaborate plans to kill the protagonist with lasers or exotic animals when ‘you could just shoot him, he’s trapped in a cell next door!’ as Dr Evil’s son implores), made Broccoli realise the James Bond franchise was in dire need of refreshing. So some good has come of it

 

[Reno]

I think I might have been told in here (likely as not by Reno ) that it’s not actually the case, but I remember reading somewhere that the Austin Power films’ relentless mocking of many outdated James Bond film cliches (such as over elaborate plans to kill the protagonist with lasers or exotic animals when ‘you could just shoot him, he’s trapped in a cell next door!’ as Dr Evil’s son implores), made Broccoli realise the James Bond franchise was in dire need of refreshing. So some good has come of it

Not me, I'm a fan of all the outdatedness

The James Bond films reinvented themselves all the time anyway. Austin Powers came out in 1997 and parodied the Bond movies of the 60s and 70s, so I don't see how that would have had an influence on updating Bond, who were in the middle of the a Pierce Brosnan period. The Daniel Craig films didn't start till nearly a decade later and if anything they were more influenced by the then popular Bourne films.

 

[Idris2002]

Dr No and Thunderball both work decades later - and there's not much from that era you can say that about.

The Seven Year Itch, for example (that's Marilyn and the subway grating movie) is still funny, but not for the original reasons it was meant to be funny.

Anyway. If as Reno argues AP parodies the earlier Bond movies, how about Steve Coogan in a Partridge-esque parody of the later Roger Moore flicks? I still maintain that Moore was the best Bond, by the way.

 

[Reno]

Dr No and Thunderball both work decades later - and there's not much from that era you can say that about.

The Seven Year Itch, for example (that's Marilyn and the subway grating movie) is still funny, but not for the original reasons it was meant to be funny.

Anyway. If as Reno argues AP parodies the earlier Bond movies, how about Steve Coogan in a Partridge-esque parody of the later Roger Moore flicks? I still maintain that Moore was the best Bond, by the way.

I never found Mike Myers funny, so haven't been a fan of the Austin Powers films anyway. I too love the Roger Moore films the most, at least from The Spy Who Loved Me onwards when they stopped writing for Moore as if he were Connery. They are beyond parody, as they never took themselves seriously anyway.

Agree with you on The Seven Year Itch, it's pretty painful to watch now. Gentlemen Prefer Blondes on the other hand still is great and as close to a feminist film as the 1950s got.

 

[Idris2002]

GPB is truly great, but the scene where Jane Russell, against all the evidence of our own eyes, insists that she has been saving herself for marriage - come on!

In the original novel of Thunderball, there's a scene where Moneypenny asks Bond why he smokes so much, and he says "well, I don't know what to do with my hands".

To which she replies, "that's not what I heard". I don't think it was ever meant to be taken seriously, somehow.

 

[Reno]

GPB is truly great, but the scene where Jane Russell, against the evidence of our own eyes, insists that she has been saving herself for marriage - come on!

I don't remember that at all. Which scene is that ?

 

[Idris2002]

I don't remember that at all. Which scene is that ?

OK, this one needs a spoiler:

Spoiler

It's at the very end when she and MM are walking down the aisle - JR says something to that effect, the precise words.

 

[Reno]

OK, this one needs a spoiler:

Spoiler

It's at the very end when she and MM are walking down the aisle - JR says something to that effect, the precise words.

What Dorothy says to Lorelei is "Remember honey, on your wedding day it's alright to say yes.", nothing about herself.

Spoiler

I would have found it hard to believe that Dorothy claims to have saved herself for marriage, considering she has the line "Nobody chaperones the chaperone"earlier on.

 

[Idris2002]

What Dorothy says to Lorelei is "Remember honey, on your wedding day it's alright to say yes.", nothing about herself.

Spoiler

I would have found it hard to believe that Dorothy claims to have saved herself for marriage, considering she has the line "Nobody chaperones the chaperone"earlier on.

Yeah, but that's obviously slipped in to keep the Hays Code crowd happy - which to my mind means that it had to apply to both members of our dreaded tag team of terror.

 

[Reno]

Yeah, but that's obviously slipped in to keep the Hays Code crowd happy - which to my mind means that it had to apply to both members of our dreaded tag team of terror.

I'd interpret that as the gal with a healthy sex life advising her pal who uses her sexuality to hold out till the price is right, that now she can say "yes". In compliance with the Hays code she actually says wedding day, not wedding night so it can be interpreted as saying "yes" at the altar. Anyways having seen the film many times, I was just questioning my memory that Dorothy would claim anything as unlikely as saving herself for marriage.

 

[Idris2002]

I'd interpret that as the gal with a healthy sex life advising her pal who uses her sexuality to hold out till the price is right, that now she can say "yes". In compliance with the Hays code she actually says wedding day, not wedding night so it can be interpreted as saying "yes" at the altar. Anyways having seen the film many times, I was just questioning my memory that Dorothy would claim anything as unlikely as saving herself for marriage.

Like I said, it's a great movie, but it is a product of 50s America. Let's not overestimate its liberated character.

 

[butcher]

Back to the OP, how can you not like Goldmember and Fat Bastard. It is not quite Frank Dreben, but what is.........

 

[Mrs Miggins]

Back to the OP, how can you not like Goldmember and Fat Bastard. It is not quite Frank Dreben, but what is.........

I just found it all really obvious and lame. Each to their own though.

 

[stavros]

I don't think I've seen them since they came out. Wayne's World still worked quite well when I saw it recently.

 

[Reno]

Like I said, it's a great movie, but it is a product of 50s America. Let's not overestimate its liberated character.

I'm not, you claimed that Dorothy has a line where she says she's been saving herself for marriage, which is not the case. That is your interpretation of an ambiguous line of dialogue, where she doesn't even refer to herself. The film has a musical number which is all about her lusting after an entire team of barely dressed, male athletes, so it's hardly subtle about Dorothy's sexuality.

 

[Sprocket.]

Austin Powers and Wayne’s World have a minimum of scenes that amuse me. For me Mike Myers best work was So I Married an Axe Murderer, but I think that was made mostly by the performances from Alan Arkin, Brenda Fricker, Anthony La Paglia and Amanda Plummer.

 

[MickiQ]

The first one was crude but had some genuinely funny scenes in it but the second and third were just basically recycling the same humour and just flogging the same dead horse.

 

[purves grundy]

Aw, reminds me of graduating, traveling, Blair etc. My lesbian ex. Guess the film was nicely accommodated by Cool Britannia (even though he's Canadian yesyesyes). And maybe <looking down guiltily> I kinda bought into that moment, and got infected with the uplifting ironic energy of Mike and the Soul Bossa Nova, but was so optimistic that I couldn't concentrate on the film because couldn't help thinking that now under a New Labour government effort will finally be rewarded.

 

[Idris2002]

I'm not, you claimed that Dorothy has a line where she says she's been saving herself for marriage, which is not the case. That is your interpretation of an ambiguous line of dialogue, where she doesn't even refer to herself. The film has a musical number which is all about her lusting after an entire team of barely dressed, male athletes, so it's hardly subtle about Dorothy's sexuality.

The details of my life are quite inconsequential... very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a fifteen year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. My childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds- pretty standard really. At the age of twelve I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum... it's breathtaking- I highly suggest you try it.