Nah. The reality of consensus decision making at most big events is a majority vote which is resolved by the people who disagree with the majority getting bored of arguing and shutting up so they can get out of the meeting and down to the pub. At its very worst, consensus becomes a means for a controlling minority to dominate meetings by virtue of being the loudest ones there.There was a piece in the Guardian today about climate camp as a group saying that they need a unanimous consensus on every single decision before they resolve to follow any given proposition.
Isn't that a wee bit unrealistic?
Consensus is stupid liberal bullshit that originated with hippy Christians and should have been left with them but it does function as a decision making process, albeit a slow and undemocratic one.