Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Attendances....

Everything about that story sums up what's wrong with this country today. We've got an arrogant posh twat as Prime Minister, and people are more interested in his stupid public schoolboy initiation tests that whether he's actually running the country properly. Meanwhile the establishment press put the boot into Jeremy Corbyn for not singing the national anthem which is (a) a dismal dirge and (b) uninclusive to anyone who is an atheist and/or a republican, as well no doubt many others too. Maintaining a respectful silence while the anthem is played or sung by others is more than adequate.

I wonder what British Jews and Muslims think about their Prime Ministers porcine necrophilia tendencies?

My post was on the wrong thread but I agree with your sentiment
 
29 September 2015 Ryman League
ATTENDANCE: Metropolitan Police v Dulwich Hamlet - 136

(one of the lowest gates for a game in the Ryman involving Dulwich Hamlet)
 
29 September 2015 Ryman League
ATTENDANCE: Metropolitan Police v Dulwich Hamlet - 136

(one of the lowest gates for a game in the Ryman involving Dulwich Hamlet)

Probably about 80 to 100 were Dulwich though. Not a single cheer when they scored, even the people who watch Met Police don't even actually support them.
 
Probably about 80 to 100 were Dulwich though. Not a single cheer when they scored, even the people who watch Met Police don't even actually support them.
They had an attendance of just 64 for a midweek league match against VCD, the least supported other club in the division, which suggests they have a base home crowd for midweek matches of not much more than 50.
 
My 'guestimate' for last Tuesday was around eighty Hamlet fans made the trip to Imber Court.
 
BTW Sorry for my ignorance but do you have to be a copper or ex-copper to play for the Repressive state apparatus? what is the connection?
 
Cheers 3010 - makes you wonder why they just don't change the name now and try to build a local fan base?
 
Cheers 3010 - makes you wonder why they just don't change the name now and try to build a local fan base?

Well they are still funded from the Police Lottery and play at Imber Court which is owned by the Met. If they changed the name I imagine the lottery money would stop, and while it might bring in some more fans to be Thames Ditton FC or whatever, I doubt it would be enough to cover the losses (I'd think it might well make no difference at all personally).
 
So 869 in attendance against Merstham on Tuesday evening 27th October 2015
as reported elsewhere certainly one of the highest mid week attendances ever

Dulwich Hamlets attendances still over a 1,000 average for the season

Interesting if compare to Salford City FC now backed by Class of 92 (ex united players) and billionaire Singapore finance
average gates 471, highest league gate 636 this season and last season 1,300 (Capacity)

also on Tuesday night Salford City drew with Matlock town at home
attendance was 427

So Dulwich Hamlet pulling in twice as many to champion hill on Tuesday night than the Class of 92 #justsaying
 
Who gives a fuck what crowds others are drawing in?
What were Salford's crowds in previous years?
I would guess their growth is comparable to the first few years for us under Gavin...

And why slag off their backers? I have no idea how much money they are throwing in...but surely it's a good thing that they are supporting and trying to grow a small, traditional local non-league side?

And with regard to our crowd, not a criticism I hasten to add, but it was boosted by a large contingent who were guests of the Club, from the superb Football Beyond Borders charity.
 
Did you watch the Class of 92 ?
Because if you did, you would note fans real concern about direction of club
and how the only driving concern of the new owners was League status
and yes think Singapore multi millionaire buying out an English non league club is an issue
if you want to see the development of more fan based/council ownership
 
Did you watch the Class of 92 ?
Because if you did, you would note fans real concern about direction of club
and how the only driving concern of the new owners was League status
and yes think Singapore multi millionaire buying out an English non league club is an issue
if you want to see the development of more fan based/council ownership

I thought it was a really fascinating documentary and worth watching for anyone with an interest in non league or lower level football. I'm sure the "Class of 92" guys all feel they're doing a good, positive thing for that club (and I thought Gary Neville came across really well), but guys like that aren't really football fans in the way we are, and don't seem to understand why doing a thing like immediately changing a club's badge and colours can cause friction. There seems to be a thin line between showing ambition for growth, and trying to force change on a club that just doesn't want it. It made me feel that Hamlet are quite fortunate in that the growth here is a bit more "organic" - it's happening because of increasing crowds, a good manager and a long-term plan, rather than because some big-money types have suddenly arrived out of nowhere and tried to turn the club into some sort of new Man Utd. Part two next week should be well worth a watch.
 
Agreed, thought it was a very good programme on Salford - very unusual to have a woman chairman I though, as you say Gary Neville came over well - Giggs seemed just wanted the team to get into the League. (loved the issue with the Sky box and the issue re fitness training v planning tactics)

Think its also interesting that despite the hype when they bought the club unlike FC United there fan base (todate) has not taken off (maybe after this programme)

I think as much as we we are proud of how we have increased attendances, think its also interesting to see clubs like Bromley (starting at a similar base) doing likewise, suspect capitalising on their success in the League and community outreach work
 
No, I haven't seen the programme, in fact I've not even heard of it. Truth be told, I haven't watched telly for years, simply don't have time to.

I don't think it's right to compare them to FCUofM. They are CLEARLY set up on different lines, and have a clear 'captive market' of disillusioned former Old Trafford goers, or those who couldn't afford to go there on a regular basis. Like the Kingston Dons, they were clearly starting than a 'larger than normal' fan base for their level.

Taking over an established non-league side like Salford City...yes, it will take time to grow support, if they do, or not. Quite clearly their crowds ARE growing. Let's not forget when our average crowds reached the four hundred mark WE thought they were huge then...

As for Bromley...trust me, they are 'only' where they are attendance wise, through doing well in the league. And that is only achieved by several backers from their Board pumping in lots of money. Their budget last season was allegedly at least three to four times higher to what ours is, though I'm not going to disclose any actual figures, as I base it on a mix of 'accurate hearsay' from people there I know are 'in the know' & confidential information given to me.

If they were to struggle in the Conference National their crowds will plummet. And by all accounts I've heard it's not the most pleasant place to go, for away sides with half-decent support, as they can get a fair bit of grief, depending on how brave these young 'Football Factory-wannabes' are. Fortunately they got a bit to lairy at Ebbsfleet United last season, and got well slapped. Some of the old school Bromley fans are, to be honest, embarrassed by them.

Bottom line is...there will never be a 'Football Utopia' of every club being fan owned, or fan directed.

As it stands I think we are in an extremely hopeful position, as if all comes to fruition, and the planning application goes through, we will have a fan owned Club handed to us all, at no cost!
 
Agreed, thought it was a very good programme on Salford - very unusual to have a woman chairman I though, as you say Gary Neville came over well - Giggs seemed just wanted the team to get into the League. (loved the issue with the Sky box and the issue re fitness training v planning tactics)

Think its also interesting that despite the hype when they bought the club unlike FC United there fan base (todate) has not taken off (maybe after this programme)

I think as much as we we are proud of how we have increased attendances, think its also interesting to see clubs like Bromley (starting at a similar base) doing likewise, suspect capitalising on their success in the League and community outreach work

I am not a fan of Bromley. Thought a section of their fans unwelcoming and sexist when I went a few weeks back.
 
I am not a fan of Bromley. Thought a section of their fans unwelcoming and sexist when I went a few weeks back.
Yes, sort of what I was saying...nothing like Champion Hill. Though I do enjoy an occasional visit there, and plan to, once our midweeks dry up, and they have a home midweek fixture, to entice me...
 
A few lads from work, Chelsea fans up until their mid teens, then started going to Millwall as they couldn't afford Chelsea once they had to start paying their ownway, now Bromley. Says it all really.
 
Anything over 200 for a London Senior Cup tie nowadays will be good. Hopefully the half price offer will push the gate over the 300 mark.
 
Very impressive friendly i thought. Something to build on. Can the club offer half price deals in the league cup as well, to get better crowds in as well?
 
Very impressive friendly i thought. Something to build on. Can the club offer half price deals in the league cup as well, to get better crowds in as well?
 
Very impressive friendly i thought. Something to build on. Can the club offer half price deals in the league cup as well, to get better crowds in as well?
It wasn't a friendly, it was the London Senior Cup which at one point wasn't very friendly! With regards to admission prices I think it might be permitted in the league cup as well providing both clubs agree to it.
 
Back
Top Bottom