Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Athletics - Running and Jumping and Throwing and stuff!

Rudisha gets his gold medal. Sadly it seems that the earlier prediction on the BBC that the 200m would massively overshadow his quite phenomenal achievement has come true.

Since when was the 200m a deal? is it just the cult of Bolt and this double double thing?
800m is a much more formidable race and what happened tonight was almost unbelievable.
 
Yeah, Inverdale - what a dick!! Why is he doing that job? There's plenty better - just fuck him off and let the others do it, would be much better. He's a fucking annoying cock.
 
Since when was the 200m a deal? is it just the cult of Bolt and this double double thing?
800m is a much more formidable race and what happened tonight was almost unbelievable.
I don't really get why the 100/200 are the highest profile races. I find the 400, 800, 5 & 10k all more immersing tbh.
 
I don't really get why the 100/200 are the highest profile races. I find the 400, 800, 5 & 10k all more immersing tbh.

Me too. Always have though maybe that was growing up in the Ovett/Coe era.
I think it's the tactical element.
In 100/200 all you have to have is a turbocharger and then launch it.
In 800+ disciplines you need to use your brain as well as have some speed.
 
I don't really get why the 100/200 are the highest profile races. I find the 400, 800, 5 & 10k all more immersing tbh.
Fastest man alive, innit. Plus I guess everyone does those distances in school athletics so they can relate to it.
 
Cos they're quicker. 1500 is a bit boring cos there's not much to watch til the last stretch
There's plenty to watch. The tactics, the positioning etc. Thinking the last stretch is the only interesting bit is like fast forwarding through the 1812 to just listen to the cannons.
 
Cos they're quicker. 1500 is a bit boring cos there's not much to watch til the last stretch
Hmmm. When I was growing up, with Coe, Ovett, Cram and Elliot, coverage was all about the 800 and 1500, with the 1500 as the 'blue riband' event.

Nothing boring about them, imo.
 
Yeah, i remember the 1984 Olympics. Tis the only other Olympiad I've paid attention to. But still now, watching people just running as fast as they can, as opposed to pacing it out and using tactics....sorry, it's sprinting that's gonna attract the viewers
 
There's plenty to watch. The tactics, the positioning etc. Thinking the last stretch is the only interesting bit is like fast forwarding through the 1812 to just listen to the cannons.
Not if you're unused to sport. The winning bit is the interesting bit. This is why football is dull to so many. Not enough goals.
 
It's like in the other track and field events; they don't try and not jump so high/far or throw so far for tactical reasons. Likewise there's an appeal in just running as fast as you can, and the results are pretty impressive imo.
 
Hmmm. When I was growing up, with Coe, Ovett, Cram and Elliot, coverage was all about the 800 and 1500, with the 1500 as the 'blue riband' event.

Nothing boring about them, imo.

Women's 10k the other night was a great race, I've always found 800m upwards more interesting. Sprinting has more of the superhero comic book appeal.
 
The gene thing was interesting, not at all convinced by the slave angle. Thought it was a valid piece i.e. worth looking into, but a yeah guff really!

I didn't see it, but I'm sure I've read that a v high (all maybe) 100m winners of the last century could trace their ancestry back to a very small area, perhaps in Jamaica. And/or the longer runners to Kenya. Probably in one of those Freakanomics/Tipping Point esque book.
 
I didn't see it, but I'm sure I've read that a v high (all maybe) 100m winners of the last century could trace their ancestry back to a very small area, perhaps in Jamaica. And/or the longer runners to Kenya. Probably in one of those Freakanomics/Tipping Point esque book.
Harold Abrahams?

Look, loads of top sprinters come from Jamaica and therefore share a Jamaican ancestry. Lots more come from Jamaican emigrants. This proves nothing other than Jamaicans are as obsessed with sprinting as Brits are with football or the Chinese are with table tennis. We don't attempt to identify a "badminton gene".
 
Don't forget that the emphasis in the bizarre BBC mini-doc and Inverdale's line of questioning was about the difference between black and white athletes, rather than between Jamaicans or East Africans with American or French runners. Why that emphasis on race, not nationality? It was truly bizarre.
I'm not sure they meant 'see, this is what we told you all along!', but it looked like it.
 
Women's 10k the other night was a great race, I've always found 800m upwards more interesting. Sprinting has more of the superhero comic book appeal.

Dunno, seems there's a real risk of devaluing the shorter races just because we don't get to see the vast majority of the work put in (because superheroes generally just get 'gifted' their powers).

It also helps that there's a lot of very very good short distance athletes right now - seen in the finishing times of those finalists who didn't get a medal. So yeah, why shouldn't it be popular?
 
If it's all about "West African twitch muscles" then where are all the Ivory Coast sprinters?
If slavery is the key then where are all the Liberian sprinters?

As with all sports, success in sprinting is about coaching and tradition. The tradition gets you take-up of the sport and coaching gets you success. Suggesting that actually it's all just genetic is insulting to that success.
 
I agree that it's insulting. And I think Michael Johnson's reaction said it all: No. Not at all. This isn't true, and here's why. He did well to stay calm, I think. And why didn't they consult him or someone else who knows about the subject before making that stupid feature?

It seems to me that there is a horrible undercurrent to this - the idea that you can call the French sprinter the 'fastest white man' or somesuch as if this were any more meaningful than saying that you're the fastest Taurus or the fastest Sagittarius.
 
On reflection, John Inverdale was a total disgrace in that piece on sprinting and race. But the feature reflected badly not just on him but on the wider BBC too. :( Shame as their coverage has generally been really good.
 
Back
Top Bottom