Artificial Intelligence Developments (ChatGPT etc)
- Thread starter steveseagull
- Start date
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
Got to have a growth mindset!
8ball
Decolonise colons!
I don’t remember the proclamations in 1974.
But tbf I had more prosaic concerns at the time.
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
This is all fine.
www.ft.com
AI’s huge power needs give oil majors incentive to invest in renewables, says Adnoc boss
Energy, tech and finance executives in discussion over how to fuel artificial intelligence
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
Is the FT pay walled? I can see it and don't have a subscription?
Oh. Now I can't. That's weird.
Silas Loom
Hated by both sides
It lets you see one article free. Not a very effective paywall, though.
littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
The AI is powered by oil to find more oil!!!This is all fine.
AI’s huge power needs give oil majors incentive to invest in renewables, says Adnoc boss
Energy, tech and finance executives in discussion over how to fuel artificial intelligence
An autonomous AI deciding where to drill/store carbon? What can possibly go wrong?
* Sets watch for the world to blow up. *
Throbbing Angel
this is no longer a place of honour
Upgraded DuckDuckGo earlier and was met with this blurb about DuckDuckGo Ai Chat
Anyone used it yet?
Anyone used it yet?
UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
No, but I love LLMs so I'll give it a try.
Been using some of the new voice ones as a revision aid when driving. Gemini is pretty good at more natural conversation, but really lacks the awareness of earlier conversation which makes ChatGPT. It's what most of the normal LLMs seem to lack as well.
I tried the voice ChatGPT and it's as good as Gemini in terms of conversation, but you only get ten mins free a month on the good one and the free one is awful.
UnderOpenSky
baseline neural therapy
Although
8ball
Decolonise colons!
Probably optimistic to think the presence or absence of AI in the blurb will indicate quality of product. As opposed to presence of MBAtards.
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
The headline is slightly misleading as they are also including cloud but still....
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
It's saying that his CEO couldn't afford to hire anybody else, but luckily they were able to work with "Motion AI" and the magic robot did all the work for them. (As a project manager, which, you know, is hard to believe). Their Whatsapp also seems to work in reverse for some reason.
tommers
It was... Rebekah Vardy's account
a) a new employee (presumably a project manager)
b) the number of people on a team. If you "increase your headcount" then you add somebody new to the team.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
But the CEO says "we weren't approved for your 2025 headcount". I don't understand who "we" is. And who is doing the approving?
I suppose maybe the Board might have had to approve the budget. But it mostly sounds like he is trying to distance himself from the consequences of a decision he took. Which would be appropriate for a company that thinks shoddy AI tools can replace human imagination and inventiveness.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Ok, so what it should actually say is "we didn't get approval for your 2025 headcount".
And the third message, which has escaped from the Whatsapp screen is also from the CEO.
And the first message saying "ok" is entirely irrelevant.
And the handwritten green tick is an unexplained mystery.
And it is supposed to be written from the perspective of the employee, who has been refused extra staff on their team, because the CEO has decided to use AI instead.
Are we supposed to suppose that the employee, in whose shoes we are being placed as reader of the advert, is pleased because their boss is pleased? Or are we supposed to be viewing the advert from the perspective of the CEO?
I think this must be the worst advert I've ever seen.
And the third message, which has escaped from the Whatsapp screen is also from the CEO.
And the first message saying "ok" is entirely irrelevant.
And the handwritten green tick is an unexplained mystery.
And it is supposed to be written from the perspective of the employee, who has been refused extra staff on their team, because the CEO has decided to use AI instead.
Are we supposed to suppose that the employee, in whose shoes we are being placed as reader of the advert, is pleased because their boss is pleased? Or are we supposed to be viewing the advert from the perspective of the CEO?
I think this must be the worst advert I've ever seen.
Similar threads
