Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
very true, but the palm community seem to be lacking in rollneck jumpers.
That's because they sold them all to pre order the Foleo last year.
very true, but the palm community seem to be lacking in rollneck jumpers.
Has Apple found the magic combination by leveraging a hugely popular and familar brand (iPod) with their larger business aspirations? Over at Salon.com, Farhad is crowning the iPhone for finally living up to all they hype. How many execs started smiling at the Exchange support announcement? This road warrior sure as heck did.
So who can catch them? Palm? Uh, Palm, hello? Palm/Handspring gave it a good try. They had the Palm Pilot/Visor that was popular, they had a great design and they had a loyal (to a fault) dev base. But nothing fed those flames and they’ve slowly died out. Rim? The RIM UI still makes me giggle, it is so 1998. Windows Mobile? I still can’t find access to some settings on my phone and it has been a year in the looking. Symbian? To Euro to care about America.
Now the question becomes, how will Apple continue to feed the flame? At the one year mark we see iPhone 2.0 software. Logic would seem to say, hold off on 3G iPhone until September/October to ramp up for the holiday season both on new phones and on discounted left overs. $5 says the 3G iPhone has the same dimensions so that 6 months later, they’ll intro iPhone Slim, perhaps the width of the touch. Then what? Clearly Steve’s got a road map and it looks to be a good ride.
I yeah I saw that, it's streaming only isn't it?
I yeah I saw that, it's streaming only isn't it?
As much as I'm frustrated myself, do you have any idea how hard it's been for the beeb to get the iplayer to the point it's at today in relation to ownership of copyright (regardless of them being pushed into bed with MS due to being obliged to include DRM)?
There's a constant battle with rights owners to get anything online - the failure to allow downloads is the old battle of allowing an unfettered copy of the programme to be downloaded, which isn't going to happen.
the crap they call "Iplayer"
Apple's SDK documentation (embedded in the TechCrunch post) points out that the iPhone can only display a single application screen at a time, and urges prospective developers to spend a lot of time designing an application that can handle quick stops and starts. "In other words, users should not feel that leaving your iPhone application and returning to it later is any more difficult than switching among applications on a computer."
There could be a number of reasons behind this stance, perhaps chief among them that the iPhone might not be able to support the processing demands required by multitasking, but plenty of other phones seem to be able to juggle more than one application at a time. I wonder whether future Apple-developed iPhone applications--like, say an iPhone version of iChat--will be subject to the same restrictions.
http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9888722-37.html
I'm not sure what programs would run and I imagine it's going to be as fiddly as fuck trying to run some apps on such a small screen. Still, it could be well handy.Looks like you'll soon be able to run any windows app you want on the iphone legitimity.
Well. I'd be delighted to be able to run Photoshop on the iPhone, but I frankly doubt it's going to have the horsepower for that or be particularly usable.The potential is there, especially if you believe the hype
"Imagine being able to run most popular PC software anywhere, with full Internet connectivity, without having to lug a notebook PC around"
It would be too much of a pain to lug about a separate card reader IMO.Running photoshop might be a bit much, although it might be alright with an older version (pre cs). As far as card readers go, could they not just make an eternal 4-1 reader like you can currently get for usb?
What I really would like to see is a native ms remote desktop client so that I could login to our servers and perform maintenance related tasks without having to be near a computer.
I might buy an iphone then, but only with c+p & 3G.
This is rather surprising - it appears that the iPhone can't do full multi-tasking:
You'd better write to CNet and tell them they've got their facts wrong then.Mine does.
You'd better write to CNet and tell them they've got their facts wrong then.
This is rather surprising - it appears that the iPhone can't do full multi-tasking:
What I really would like to see is a native ms remote desktop client so that I could login to our servers and perform maintenance related tasks without having to be near a computer.
Could you name some of these "clueless, non-technical journos" please, just so I know to avoid their opinion in the future. Thanks.Its just the media seizing some info and trying to make a big point out of it. And then all the developers and everyone else who has a clue having to calm them down... ( @ clueless, non-technical journos who read technical documents and make pointless news-stories out of them)
Oh, and being able to run an email client in the background is not full multi-tasking.
Well, there's 'nuff Windows Mobile users digging it, although I'm happy with the Palm's way of doing things and - I imagine - the iPhone's too. I guess it depends on how much of a power user you are.Why would you want to have full multi tasking on a phone anyway? What purpose would it serve?
After reading loads of stuff about the SDK I think Apple are really going in the right direction with the iPhone.
Why would you want to have full multi tasking on a phone anyway? What purpose would it serve?
Oh, and being able to run an email client in the background is not full multi-tasking. Even my Palm can do that.
As a developer myself, I really despair at some articles I read. Some of it is bordering on tech quackery. It's generally ok on the broadsheets, but out there on the web, tech sites like CNET can have some of the worst articles - possibly because they are using people who are doing it as a sideline, and also because I suspect there is relatively little fact checking and editorial control.
Why would you want to have full multi tasking on a phone anyway? What purpose would it serve?